Skip to main content

Videopanorama Frame Rate Requirements Derived from Visual Discrimination of Deceleration During Simulated Aircraft Landing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtual and Remote Control Tower

Abstract

In order to determine the required visual frame rate (FR) for minimizing prediction errors with out-the-window video displays at remote/virtual airport towers, 13 active air-traffic controllers viewed high dynamic fidelity simulations of landing aircraft and decided whether aircraft would stop as if to be able to make a turnoff or whether a runway excursion would be expected. The viewing conditions and simulation dynamics replicated visual rates and environments of transport aircraft landing at small commercial airports. The required frame rate was estimated using Bayes inference on prediction errors by linear FR-extrapolation of event probabilities conditional on predictions (stop, no-stop). Furthermore, estimates were obtained from exponential model fits to the parametric and nonparametric perceptual discriminabilities d′ and A (average area under ROC curves) as dependent on FR. Decision errors are biased towards preference of overshoot and appear due to illusionary increase in speed at low frame rates. Both Bayes and A-extrapolations yield a frame rate requirement of 35 < FRmin < 40 Hz. When comparing with published results [Claypool and Claypool (Multimedia Syst 13:3–17, 2007)] on shooter game scores, the model-based d′(FR)-extrapolation exhibits the best agreement and indicates even higher FRmin > 40 Hz for minimizing decision errors. Definitive recommendations require further experiments with FR > 30 Hz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eye movements will not be discussed in this chapter. For analysis of eye movements, see chapter “Assessing Operational Validity of Remote Tower Control in High-fidelity Simulation” and references therein.

References

  • Anderson DE, Vogel EK, Awh E (2011) Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. J Neurosci 31:1128–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby FG (1983) A biased random walk model for two choice reaction times. J Math Psychol 27:277–297

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bays PM, Gorgoraptis N, Wee N, Marshall L, Husain M (2011) Temporal dynamics of encoding, storage, and reallocation of visual working memory. J Vision 11(10):6, 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Claypool KT, Claypool M (2007) On frame rate and player performance in first person shooter games. Multimedia Syst 13:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis SR, Liston DB (2011) Static and motion-based visual features used by airport tower controllers, NASA TM-2011-216427. Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis SR, Liston DB (2010) Visual features involving motion seen from airport control towers. In: Proceedings of the 11th IFAC/-IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France, 31 Sep–3 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis SR, Fürstenau N, Mittendorf M (2011a) Frame rate effects on visual discrimination of landing aircraft deceleration: implications for virtual tower design and speed perception. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society, 55th annual meeting, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 19–23 Sept 2011, pp 71–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis SR, Fürstenau N, Mittendorf M (2011a) Determination of frame rate requirements of video-panorama-based virtual towers using visual discrimination of landing aircraft deceleration during simulated aircraft landing. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI 22(33):519–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenau N, Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Möhlenbrink C, Papenfuß A, Kaltenhäuser S (2009) Steps towards the virtual tower: remote airport traffic control center (RAiCe). In: Proceedings of EIWAC 2009, ENRI international workshop on ATM & CNS, Tokyo, 5–6 March 2009, pp 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenau N, Mittendorf M, Ellis S (2012) Remote towers: videopanorama frame rate requirements derived from visual discrimination of deceleration during simulated aircraft landing. In: Schäfer D (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd SESAR innovation days, Braunschweig. http://www.sesarinnovationdays.eu/files/SIDs/2012/SID%202012-02.pdf

  • Grunwald AJ, Kohn S (1994) Visual field information in low-altitude visual flight by line-of-sight slaved head mounted displays. IEEE Syst Man Cybern 24(1):120–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon D, Lee JT, Geyer M, Sheridan T, Francis M, Woods S, Malonson M (2008) Feasibility evaluation of a staffed virtual tower. J Air Traffic Control, 27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempster KA (2000) Frame rate effect on human spatial interpretation of visual intelligence. MastersThesis, NPS, Monterrey, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone JA (2004) A visual motion sensor based on the properties of V1 and MT neurons. Vision Res 44:1733–1755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Werther B, Fürstenau N (2007) Development of an augmented vision videopanorama human-machine interface for remote airport tower operation. In: Proceedings of the HCII2007 Beijing, Springer lecture notes computer science 4558, pp 1119–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • SESAR-Ju Project 06.09.03 (2003) Remote provision of ATS to a single aerodrome—validation report, edition 00.01.02. www.sesarju.eu

  • Van Schaik FJ, Lindqvist G, Roessingh HJM. Assessment of visual cues by tower controllers. In: Proceedings 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France, 31 Aug–3 Sep 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • van Scheijk FJ, Roessingh JJM, Bengtsson J, Lindqvist G, Fält K (2010) Advanced remote tower project validation results. In: Proceedings 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France, 31 Aug–Sep 3 2010. doi:10.3182/20100831-4-FR-2021.00025

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson AB, Ramirez CV, Salud E (2009) Predicting visibility of aircraft. PLoS ONE 4(5), e5594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Mueller ST (2005) A note on ROC analysis and non-parametric estimate of sensitivity. Psychometrica 70(1):203–212

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our special thanks are due to Monika Mittendorf for excellent support in data preparation and evaluation. Furthermore, we wish to thank DLR personnel Frank Morlang, Markus Schmidt, and Tristan Schindler for technical assistance in the operation of the DLR Apron-and Tower simulator (ATS) and the preparation of video files. Anne Papenfuss and Christoph Möhlenbrink organized the framework for this experiment that was part of a larger human-in-the loop RTO-simulation trial, and we are indebted to them for valuable assistance in the conduct of the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Fürstenau Dipl Phys, Dr. phil. nat. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fürstenau, N., Ellis, S.R. (2016). Videopanorama Frame Rate Requirements Derived from Visual Discrimination of Deceleration During Simulated Aircraft Landing. In: Fürstenau, N. (eds) Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28717-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28719-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics