Skip to main content

Assessing Operational Validity of Remote Tower Control in High-Fidelity Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Virtual and Remote Control Tower

Abstract

In this chapter, results from simulation studies are presented which were conducted to assess the operational validity of the remote tower concept at a very early maturity level. The goal was to gain empirical evidence to lead further developmental activities and to learn about the critical design issues and human factors of the remote tower control concept. A high-fidelity simulation study with 12 tower controllers was conducted to assess the operational validity of an experimental workplace for remote tower control. The core of this workplace is a panoramic display, presenting high resolution video data of the remotely controlled airport. Besides the feasibility of the concept, the study addressed the relevance of the view outside the tower window and the benefit of information augmentation. Eye tracking, questionnaire, and interview data were gathered. Results indicate that the concept is valid for control of smaller airports with little air traffic. The augmentation of callsigns onto the video panorama reduced head-down times for the radar display.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, the term controller refers to both male and female operators. For ease of reading, the male personal pronoun will be used.

References

  • Brooke J (1996) SUS: a “quick and dirty” usability scale. In: Jordan PW, Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL (eds) Usability evaluation in industry. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson TL, McIntyre RM (1997) A conceptual framework for teamwork measurement. In: Brannick MT, Salas E, Prince C (eds) Team performance assessment and measurement: theory, methods, and application. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmann A, Kallus KW, van Damme D (2000) Integrated task and job analysis of air traffic controllers—phase 3: baseline reference of air traffic controller tasks and cognitive processes in the ECAC Area (trans: H. F. a. M. Unit). Eurocontrol

    Google Scholar 

  • Durso FT, Hackworth CA, Truitt TR, Crutchfield J, Nikolic D, Manning CA (1999) Situation awareness as a predictor of performance in en route air traffic controllers (trans: O. o. A. Medicine) Aerospace Medicine Technical Reports. Federal Aviation Administration, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Durso FT, Sethumadhavan A, Crutchfield J (2008) Linking task analysis to information relevance. Hum Factors 50(5):755–762. doi:10.1518/001872008X312369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endsley M (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurocontrol (2008) The SHAPE questionnaires. http://www.eurocontrol.int/humanfactors/public/standard_page/SHAPE_Questionnaires.html. Accessed 26 Apr 2010

  • FĂĽrstenau N, Rudolph M, Schmidt M, Werther B (2004a) Virtual tower wettbewerb der visionen 2001–2004. Deutsches Zentrum fĂĽr Luft- und Raumfahrt, Köln, pp 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • FĂĽrstenau N, Rudolph M, Schmidt M, Lorenz B, Albrecht T (2004b) On the use of transparent rear projection screens to reduce head-down time in the air traffic control tower. In: Vincenzi DA, Mouloua M, Hancock PA (eds) Human performance, situation awareness and automation technology: current research and trends. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • FĂĽrstenau N, Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Möhlenbrink C, Halle W (2008) Augmented vision videopanorama system for remote airport tower operation. In: Grant I (ed) Proceedings of the 26 international congress of the aeronautical sciences (ICAS), Optimage Ltd, Edingburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross H, Friedrich M (2010). A toolchain for gaze analysis using dynamic areas of interest. Poster presented at the HFES European chapter, Berlin, 13–15 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilburn B (2004) Head-down times in aerodrome operations: a scope study. Technical Report, Center for Human Performance Research, Den Haag

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange M (2014) Information search for decision-making in tower air traffic control: a field study. Master Thesis, Technical University Chemnitz, Chemnitz

    Google Scholar 

  • LFV (2015) Sweden first in the world with remotely operated air traffic management. http://www.lfv.se/en/News/News-2015/Sweden-first-in-the-world-with-remotely-operated-air-traffic-management/. Accessed 22 Sep 2015

  • Möhlenbrink C, Friedrich M, PapenfuĂź A, Rudolph M, Schmidt M, Morlang F, FĂĽrstenau N (2010) High-fidelity human-in-the-loop simulations as one step towards remote control of regional airports: a preliminary study. ICRAT, Budapest, 1–4 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehme A, Schulz-RĂĽckert D (2010) Distant air traffic control for regional airports. Paper presented at the 11th IFAC, IFIP, IFORS, IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France

    Google Scholar 

  • PapenfuĂź A, Möhlenbrink C (2009) Kognitive Arbeitsanalyse Lotsenarbeitsplatz. Institutsbericht No. 112-2009/20. Deutsches Zentrum fĂĽr Luft- und Raumfahrt, Braunschweig

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris CR, Salas E, Cannon Bowers JA (2000) Teamwork in multi-person systems: a review and analysis. Ergonomics 43(8):1052–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson S, Pinska E (2006). Human performance with simulated collimation in transparent projection screens. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on research in air transportation (ICRAT), Belgrade, 24–28 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinska E (2006) An investigation of the head-up time at tower and ground control positions. EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, Bretigny

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinska E (2007) Warsaw tower observations. In: EUROCONTROL EEC note no. 02/07. EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, Bretigny

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvucci DD, Goldberg JH (2000) Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: Proceedings of the eye tracking research and application symposium, ACM Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Werther B, FĂĽrstenau N (2006) Remote airport tower operation with augmented vision video panorama HMI. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on research in air transportation (ICRAT 2006), Belgrade, pp 221–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Werther B, FĂĽrstenau N (2007) Development of an augmented vision videopanorama human-machine interface for remote airport tower operation. In: Proceedings of human computer interaction international (HCII), Beijing, Springer Lecture Notes Computer Science 4558, pp 1119–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavanti M, Bourgois M (2006) A field study on visual aspects of tower operations. In: EUROCONTROL innovative research workshop 2006. EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre, BrĂ©tigny, pp 105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik FJ, Roessingh JJM, Bengtson J, Lindqvist G, Fält K (2010) Advanced remote tower project validation results. Paper presented at the 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt J, Hagemann T, Kastner M (2006) The impact of workload on heart rate and blood pressure in en-route and tower air traffic control. J Psychophysiol 20(4):297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittbrodt N, ThĂĽring M (2010) Communication in future remote airport traffic control centres. Paper presented at the human centered automation—HFES European Chapter, Berlin, 13–15 Oct 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A number of people have contributed to this study with their commitment and work: Maik Friedrich, who developed and constantly improved the EyeTA; Tristan Schindler, who dedicated himself to the calibration of the eye-tracking system; Michael Rudolph and Markus Schmidt, who realised the RTO-CWP; Sebastian Schier, who set up the simulation, scenarios and trained the pseudo pilots; Norbert FĂĽrstenau, who managed research in remote tower; and last but not least all tower controllers, who took part in this study and provided invaluable feedback.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Papenfuss M.A. Media Sciences .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papenfuss, A., Möhlenbrink, C. (2016). Assessing Operational Validity of Remote Tower Control in High-Fidelity Simulation. In: Fürstenau, N. (eds) Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28717-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28719-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics