Abstract
Initial analysis of Remote Control Tower (RTO) field test with a prototype videopanorama system under quasi-operational conditions [Friedrich and Möhlenbrink (Proceedings of the 10th USA/Europe air traffic management research and development seminar (ATM 2013), 2013] has shown performance deficits quantified by two-alternative aircraft maneuver discrimination tasks [Fürstenau et al (EPCE/HCII 2013, Part II, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 8020:105–114, 2013)]. Here, we present the quantitative analysis of these results using the complementary methods of Bayes inference, signal detection theory (SDT) with parametric and nonparametric discriminabilities d′ and A and application of time pressure theory [Fürstenau et al (EPCE/HCII 2013, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) 8532:143–154, 2014)]. RTO-controller working position (CWP) performance was directly compared with one of the conventional tower-CWP with direct out-of-windows view by means of simultaneous aircraft maneuver observations within the control zone at both operator positions. For this analysis, we considered correct (hit rate) and incorrect (false alarms, FA) answers to discrimination tasks, and we took into account nonanswers for a pessimistic quantification of RTO performance. As initial working hypothesis, this lead to the concept of time pressure (TP) as one major source of the measured response errors. A fit of experimental error rates with an error function derived from the Hendy et al. information processing (IP/TP) hypothesis [Hendy et al (Hum Factors 39:(1):30–47, 1997)] provides some evidence in support of this model. We expect the RTO performance deficits to decrease with the introduction of certain automation features to reduce time pressure and improve the usability of the videopanorama system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ellis SR, Liston DB (2010) Visual features involving motion seen from airport control towers. In: Proceedings of the11th IFAC/-IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France, 31 Sept–3 Oct 2010
Fowles-Winkler AM (2003) Modelling with the integrated performance modelling environment (IPME). In: Proceedings of the 15th European simulation symposium. SCS European Council, ISBN 3-936150-29-X
Friedrich M, Möhlenbrink C (2013) Which data provide the best insight? A field trial for validating a remote tower operation concept. In: Proceedings of the 10th USA/Europe air traffic management research and development seminar (ATM 2013), 10–13 June
Fürstenau N, Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Möhlenbrink C, Papenfuß A, Kaltenhäuser S. (2009) Steps towards the virtual tower: remote airport traffic control center (RAiCe). In: Proceedings of the EIWAC 2009, ENRI international workshop on ATM & CNS, Tokyo, 5–6 Mar 2009, pp 67–76
Fürstenau N, Mittendorf M, Friedrich M (2013) Discriminability of flight maneuvers and risk of false decisions derived from dual choice decision errors in a videopanorama-based remote tower work position. In: Harris D (ed) EPCE/HCII 2013, Part II, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) vol 8020, pp 105–114
Fürstenau N, Mittendorf M, Friedrich M (2014) Model-based analysis of two-alternative decision errors in a videopanorama-based remote tower work position. In: Harris D (ed) EPCE/HCII 2013, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (LNAI) vol 8532, pp 143–154
Hannon D, Lee J, Geyer TM, Sheridan T, Francis M, Woods S, Malonson M (2008) Feasibility evaluation of a staffed virtual tower. J Air Traffic Control Winter 2008:27–39
Hendy KC, Jianquiao L, Milgram P (1997) Combining time and intensity effects in assessing operator information-processing load. Hum Factors 39(1):30–47
MacMillan NA, Creelman CD (2005) Detection theory. Psychology Press, New York
Schmidt M, Rudolph M, Werther B, Fürstenau N (2007) Development of an augmented vision videopanorama human-machine interface for remote airport tower operation. In: Proceedings of the HCII2007 Beijing, Springer Lecture Notes Computer Science 4558(2007):1119–1128
Van Schaik FJ, Lindqvist G, Roessingh HJM (2010) Assessment of visual cues by tower controllers. In: Proceedings of the 11th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on analysis, design, and evaluation of human-machine systems, Valenciennes, France, 31 Aug–Sept 3 2010
Watson AB, Ramirez CV, Salud E (2009) Predicting visibility of aircraft. PLoS One 4(5): e5594. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005594
Zhang J, Mueller ST (2005) A note on ROC analysis and non-parametric estimate of sensitivity. Psychometrica 70(1):203–212
Acknowledgement
We are indebted to M. Friedrich (author of the previous chapter “Which Metrics Provide the Insight Needed? A Selection of Remote Tower Evaluation Metrics to Support a Remote Tower Operation Concept Validation”) for organizing and designing the successful validation experiments, the first one for an RTO system with systematic flight maneuver observation. We thank DFS personnel N. Becker, T. Heeb, P. Distelkamp, and S. Axt for excellent support and cooperation during preparation of the experiment. Many thanks are due to C. Möhlenbrink and A. Papenfuß for support and performing online interviews during the exercises. Markus Schmidt, Tristan Schindler, and Michael Rudolph were responsible for the engineering and RTO software of the experiment and did a great job during wintertime with the technical setup. We are indebted to A. Grüttemann who served as flight engineer for the onboard data acquisition. We acknowledge the support of the DLR flight experiments department and in particular excellent cooperation with pilots G. Mitscher and P. Bergmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fürstenau, N. (2016). Model-Based Analysis of Two-Alternative Decision Errors in a Videopanorama-Based Remote Tower Work Position. In: Fürstenau, N. (eds) Virtual and Remote Control Tower. Research Topics in Aerospace. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28719-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28717-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28719-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)