Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flow in Creativity: A Review of Potential Theoretical Conflict

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Flow Experience

Abstract

This chapter reviews both qualitative and experimental research, arguing that some theories surrounding flow are potentially contradictory to theories of creativity. Dual-process thought systems and hypofrontality theories are discussed in relation to creativity and flow, highlighting omissions in research to date, and the need for further empirical investigation of creativity in flow. Four specific areas for future research are proposed: (1) a more in-depth understanding of self-evaluative mechanisms during flow, and the relevance of clear goals and feedback within creative domains; (2) whether flow during deliberate forms of creativity is possible and whether this contradicts hypofrontality theories; (3) the complex relationship between creativity, affect, and flow; and (4) whether and how flow relates to creative achievement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adee, S. (2012, February 6). Zap your brain into the zone: Fast track to pure focus. New Scientist, 2850. http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21328501.600-zap-your-brain-into-the-zone-fast-track-to-pure-focus.html?full=true&print=true. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  • Akbari Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2012). Creative mood swings: Divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychological Research, 76, 634–640. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0358-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, A. P., & Thomas, K. E. (2011). A dual process account of creative thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(2), 109–118. doi:10.1080/10400419.2011.571183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Gitomer, J. (1984). Children’s artistic creativity: Effects of choice in task materials. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10(2), 209–215. doi:10.1177/0146167284102006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college students feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 205–223. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9132-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. doi:10.1037/a0012815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, A. B. (2005). Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 26–44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfield, J., & Burgess, M. (2013). A phenomenology of artistic doing: Flow as embodied knowing in 2D and 3D professional artists. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 44(1), 60–91. doi:10.1163/15691624-12341245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. I. B. (1957). The art of scientific investigation. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. (2007). Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 31–34. doi:10.1145/1232743.1232769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2011). Facilitate insight by non-invasive brain stimulation. PloS One, 6(2), e16655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, G. (2013). Art therapy and flow: A review of the literature and applications. Art Therapy, 30(2), 64–70. doi:10.1080/07421656.2013.787211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, V. P., Coffman, B. A., Mayer, A. R., Weisend, M. P., Lane, T. D. R., Calhoun, V. D., et al. (2012). TDCS guided using fMRI significantly accelerates learning to identify concealed objects. NeuroImage, 59(1), 117–128. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colzato, L. S., Ozturk, A., & Hommel, B. (2012). Meditate to create: The impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 116. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00116.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Comadena, M. E. (1984). Brainstorming groups: Ambiguity tolerance, communication apprehension, task attraction, and individual productivity. Small Group Research, 15(2), 251–264. doi:10.1177/104649648401500207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cseh, G. M., Phillips, L. H., & Pearson, D. G. (2015a). Flow, affect, and visual creativity. Cognition and Emotion, 29(2), 281–291. doi:10.1080/02699931.2014.913553.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cseh, G. M., Phillips, L. H., & Pearson, D. G. (2015b). Mental and perceptual feedback in the development of creative flow. Manuscript submitted for publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1988). The future of flow. In M. Csíkszentmihályi & I. S. Csíkszentmihályi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 364–383). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2002). Flow: The classic work on how to achieve happiness (Rev. ed.). London: Rider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Csíkszentmihályi, I. S. (1988). Introduction to part IV. In M. Csíkszentmihályi & I. S. Csíkszentmihályi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 251–265). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Csíkszentmihályi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. In A. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Manzano, O., Theorell, T., Harmat, L., & Ullén, F. (2010). The psychophysiology of flow during piano playing. Emotion, 10(3), 301–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (Eds.). (2011). The phenomenology of optimal experience in daily life. In Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology 2 (Vol. 2, pp. 89–110). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9876-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A. (2004a). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(4), 746–761. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A. (2004b). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1011–1026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engeser, S., & Schiepe-Tiska, A. (2012). Historical lines and an overview of current research on flow. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., & Slayton, K. (1988). Explorations of creative visual synthesis in mental imagery. Memory and Cognition, 16(3), 252–257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. (2011). Brain buzz. Nature, 472, 156–158. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110413/full/472156a.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, B. (1952). The creative process: A symposium. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. (1996). Thinking: Directed, undirected, and creative (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K., & Murphy, P. (2005). Differentiating insight from non-insight problems. Thinking and Reasoning, 11(3), 279–302. doi:10.1080/13546780442000187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0029528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruzelier, J., Inoue, A., Smart, R., Steed, A., & Steffert, T. (2010). Acting performance and flow state enhanced with sensory-motor rhythm neurofeedback comparing ecologically valid immersive VR and training screen scenarios. Neuroscience Letters, 480(2), 112–116. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1999). Flow in sports: The keys to optimal experiences and performances. Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., & Kimiecik, J. (2008). The flow perspective of optimal experience in sport and physical activity. In T. S. Horn (Ed.), Advances in sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 377–399). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Thomas, P. R., Marsh, H. W., & Smethurst, C. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept, psychological skills, and performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. A., Eklund, R. C., & Martin, A. (2010). The flow manual: The manual for the flow scales. Menlo Park: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, S. P., & Furman, L. (2014, August). Progressive change in formal qualities of art produced over the course of frontotemporal dementia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264662859_Progressive_Change_in_Fomal_Qualities_of_Art_Produced_over_the_Course_of_Frontotemporal_Dementia. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  • Kaufmann, G., & Vosberg, S. K. (1997). ‘Paradoxical’ mood effects on creative problem-solving. Cognition and Emotion, 11(2), 151–170. doi:10.1080/026999397379971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Bless, H. (2008). Flow and regulatory compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196–209. doi:10.1177/0146167207310026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Blomann, F. (2008). Locus of control and the flow experience: An experimental analysis. European Journal of Personality, 22(7), 589–607. doi:10.1002/per.692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J., & Landhäußer, A. (2012). The flow model revisited. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 51–64). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, S. (2014, July 28). Innovation turbo-charge: How to train the brain to be more creative. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenkotler/2014/07/28/the-innovation-turbo-charge-heightened-creativity-with-flow/. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  • Kozbelt, A. (2007). A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 144–168. doi:10.1177/0305735607068892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landhäußer, A., & Keller, J. (2012). Flow and its affective, cognitive, and performance-related consequences. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 65–86). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_4.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., Byrne, C., & Carlton, L. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 292–306. doi:10.1177/0305735606064838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massimini, F., Csíkszentmihályi, M., & Delle Fave, A. (1988). Flow and biocultural evolution. In M. Csíkszentmihályi & I. S. Csíkszentmihályi (Eds.), Optimal experience: Psychological studies of flow in consciousness (pp. 60–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Merrotsy, P. (2013). Tolerance of ambiguity: A trait of the creative personality? Creativity Research Journal, 25(2), 232–237. doi:10.1080/10400419.2013.783762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B. (2012). On the measurement and conceptualization of flow. In S. Engeser (Ed.), Advances in flow research (pp. 23–50). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_2.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 107–120. doi:10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, S. (1996). The achievement zone. New York: Berkley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, J., & Csíkszentmihályi, M. (2005). The concept of flow. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 89–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliverio, A. (2008). Brain and creativity. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 173, 66–78. doi:10.1143/PTPS.173.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. N. (1981). The mind’s best work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (2009). Ion (trans: Jowett, B.). The internet classics archive (Original work published ca. 380 B.C.E.). http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/ion.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  • Privette, G., & Bundrick, C. M. (1991). Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: Correspondence of personal descriptions and theoretical constructs. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(5), 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, F., & Prior, S. (2006). Creative adventures and flow in art-making: A qualitative study of women living with cancer. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(6), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rheinberg, F., & Vollmeyer, R. (2003). Flow-erleben in einem Computerspiel unter experimentell variierten Bedingungen [Flow experience in a computer game under experimentally controlled conditions]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogatko, T. P. (2007). The influence of flow on positive affect in college students. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(2), 133–148. doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9069-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1994). Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity (pp. 40–76). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, B. (2004). The paradox of choice: Why more is less. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20(2), 283–318. doi:10.1006/drev.1999.0504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2005). Creativity. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 351–369). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. ACM Computers in Entertainment, 3(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, D. (1993). The impact of task complexity on information use in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. A., & Pain, M. D. (1999). The zone: Evidence of a universal phenomenon for athletes across sports. Athletic Insight The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 1(3), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenasni, F., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. (2008). Creativity and tolerance of ambiguity: An empirical study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(1), 61–73. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01080.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Art, Design & Fashion, University of Central Lancashire, 223 Victoria Building, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, England, UK

    Genevieve M. Cseh

Authors
  1. Genevieve M. Cseh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genevieve M. Cseh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    László Harmat

  2. Department of Education, University of Aarhus, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Frans Ørsted Andersen

  3. Department of Education, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark

    Fredrik Ullén

  4. School of Health Professionals, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, East Sussex, United Kingdom

    Jon Wright

  5. School of Health Sciences, University of Brighton, East Bourne, East Sussex, United Kingdom

    Gaynor Sadlo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cseh, G.M. (2016). Flow in Creativity: A Review of Potential Theoretical Conflict. In: Harmat, L., Ørsted Andersen, F., Ullén, F., Wright, J., Sadlo, G. (eds) Flow Experience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28634-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation