Abstract
Traditional mode choice models consider travel modes of an individual in a consecutive trip to be independent. However, a persons choice of the travel mode of a trip is likely to be affected by the mode choice of the previous trips, particularly when it comes to car driving. Furthermore, traditional travel mode choice models involve discrete choice models, which are largely derived from expert knowledge, to build rules or heuristics. Their approach relies heavily on a predefined specific model structure (utility model) and constraining it to hold across an entire series of historical observations. These studies also assumed that the travel diaries of individuals in travel survey data is complete, which seldom occurs. Therefore, in this chapter, we propose a data-driven methodology with artificial neural networks (ANNs) and fuzzy sets (to better represent historical knowledge in an intuitive way) to model travel mode choices. The proposed methodology models and analyses travel mode choice of an individual trip and its influence on consecutive trips of individuals. The methodology is tested using the Household Travel Survey (HTS) data of Sydney metropolitan area and its performance is compared with the state-of-the-art approaches such as decision trees. Experimental results indicate that the proposed methodology with ANN and fuzzy sets can effectively improve the accuracy of travel mode choice prediction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Household Income and Income Distribution, Australia, 2009-2010 (Canberra, Australia, 2012)
Australian Taxation Office, Parent, spouse’s parent or individual relative tax offset calculator (2012), Retrieved on 07 May 2013
Australian Taxation Office, Household Assistance Package—Tax Reforms (2013), Retrieved on 07 May 2013
C.R. Bhat, S.K. Dubey, A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modelling. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 67, 68–85 (2014)
J.P. Biagioni, P.M. Szczurek, P.C. Nelson, A. Mohammadian, Tour-based mode choice modeling: Using an ensemble of conditional and unconditional data mining classifiers, in Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, 11–15 January 2008
M.C.J. Bliemer, J.M. Rose, Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 45(1), 63–79
Bureau of Transport Statistics, Sydney Strategic Travel Model (STM): Modelling future travel patterns (Transport for New South Wales, Sydney, 2011)
G.E. Cantarella, S. De Luca, Modeling transportation mode choice through artificial neural networks, in Fourth International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003, pp. 84–90, 24–24 Sept 2003. doi: 10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236145
C. Cirillo, K.W. Axhausen, Mode choice of complex tours: A panel analysis, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, vol. 142 (Zurich: Institut fr Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassenund Eisenbahnbau (IVT), ETH Zurich, 2002)
A. Daly, S. Zachary, Improved multiple choice models, in Identifying and measuring the determinants of mode choice, ed. by D. Hensher, Q. Dalvi (Teakfield, London, 1979), pp. 335–357
M. Dell’Orco, G. Circella, D. Sassanelli, A hybrid approach to combine fuzziness and randomness in travel choice prediction. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185(2007), 648–658 (2007)
M.J.I. Gaudry, Dogit and logit models of travel mode choice in Montreal. Can. J. Econ. 13, 268–279 (1980)
M.J.I. Gaudry, M.G. Degenais, The dogit model. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 13, 105–111 (1979)
Hagan, M.T., and M. Menhaj (1994) Training feed-forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 5(6), 989–993
D.A. Hensher, T.T. Ton, A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice. Transp. Res. Part E: Log. Transp. Rev. 36(3), 155–172 (2000)
M.G. Karlaftis, E.I. Vlahogianni, Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 19(3), 387–399
G. J. Klir, B. Yuan. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications (Prentice Hall, 1995)
W. McCulloch, W. Pitts, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 7, 115–133 (1943)
D. McFadden, in Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. by P. Zarembka (Academic Press, New York, 1973)
M.G. McNally, in The Four Step Model, ed. by D.A. Hensher, K.J. Button Handbook of Transport Modeling (Pergamon Publishing, 2007)
E.J. Miller, M.J. Roorda, J.A. Carrasco, A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 32(4), 399–422 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3
M.F. Moller, A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks 6, 525–533 (1993)
Sho-ichiro Nakayama, Jun-ichi Takayama, Junya Nakai, Kazuki Nagao, Semi-dynamic traffic assignment model with mode and route choices under stochastic travel times. J. Adv. Transp. 46(3), 269–281 (2012)
P. Nijkamp, A. Reggiani, T. Tritapepe, Modelling inter-urban transport flows in Italy: a comparison between neural network analysis and logit analysis. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 4(6), 323–338 (1996)
Dongjoo Park, Seungjae Lee, Chansung Kim, Changho Choi, Chungwon Lee, Access mode choice behaviors of water transportation: a case of Bangkok. J.Adv. Transp. 44(1), 19–33 (2010)
I. Rasmidatta, Mode Choice Models for Long Distance Travel in USA, PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, USA, 2006
A. Reggiani, T. Tritapepe, Neural Networks and Logit Models Applied to Commuters Mobility in the Metropolitan Area of Milan, in Neural Networks in Transport Systems, ed. by V. Himanen, P. Nijkamp, A. Reggiani (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2000), pp. 111–129
D. Shmueli, I. Salomon, D. Shefer, Neural network analysis of travel behavior: evaluating tools for prediction. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 4(3), 151–166 (1996)
TfL (Transport for London) (2011) Travel in London. Supplementary Report: London Travel Demand. Survey (LTDS), Retrieved on Dec 7, 2013
X. Wu, V. Kumar, J.R. Quinlan, J. Ghosh, Q. Yang, H. Motoda, G.J. McLachlan, A. Ng, B. Liu, P.S. Yu, Z. Zhou, M. Steinbach, D.J. Hand, D. Steinberg, Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14(1), 1–37 (2008)
C. Xie, J. Lu, E. Parkany, Work travel mode choice modeling using data mining: decision trees and neural networks. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board (1854), 50–61
G. Yaldi, M.A.P. Taylor, W. Yue, Examining the possibility of fuzzy set theory application in travel demand modelling. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 8, 579–592 (2010)
L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shukla, N., Ma, J., Wickramasuriya, R., Huynh, N., Perez, P. (2016). Modelling Mode Choice of Individual in Linked Trips with Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Representation. In: Shanmuganathan, S., Samarasinghe, S. (eds) Artificial Neural Network Modelling. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28493-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28495-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)