Skip to main content

Modelling Mode Choice of Individual in Linked Trips with Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Representation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Artificial Neural Network Modelling

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 628))

  • 7719 Accesses

Abstract

Traditional mode choice models consider travel modes of an individual in a consecutive trip to be independent. However, a persons choice of the travel mode of a trip is likely to be affected by the mode choice of the previous trips, particularly when it comes to car driving. Furthermore, traditional travel mode choice models involve discrete choice models, which are largely derived from expert knowledge, to build rules or heuristics. Their approach relies heavily on a predefined specific model structure (utility model) and constraining it to hold across an entire series of historical observations. These studies also assumed that the travel diaries of individuals in travel survey data is complete, which seldom occurs. Therefore, in this chapter, we propose a data-driven methodology with artificial neural networks (ANNs) and fuzzy sets (to better represent historical knowledge in an intuitive way) to model travel mode choices. The proposed methodology models and analyses travel mode choice of an individual trip and its influence on consecutive trips of individuals. The methodology is tested using the Household Travel Survey (HTS) data of Sydney metropolitan area and its performance is compared with the state-of-the-art approaches such as decision trees. Experimental results indicate that the proposed methodology with ANN and fuzzy sets can effectively improve the accuracy of travel mode choice prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Household Income and Income Distribution, Australia, 2009-2010 (Canberra, Australia, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Australian Taxation Office, Parent, spouse’s parent or individual relative tax offset calculator (2012), Retrieved on 07 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Taxation Office, Household Assistance Package—Tax Reforms (2013), Retrieved on 07 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.R. Bhat, S.K. Dubey, A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modelling. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 67, 68–85 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J.P. Biagioni, P.M. Szczurek, P.C. Nelson, A. Mohammadian, Tour-based mode choice modeling: Using an ensemble of conditional and unconditional data mining classifiers, in Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, Washington, 11–15 January 2008

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.C.J. Bliemer, J.M. Rose, Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: An empirical study in air travel choice. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 45(1), 63–79

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bureau of Transport Statistics, Sydney Strategic Travel Model (STM): Modelling future travel patterns (Transport for New South Wales, Sydney, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.E. Cantarella, S. De Luca, Modeling transportation mode choice through artificial neural networks, in Fourth International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, ISUMA 2003, pp. 84–90, 24–24 Sept 2003. doi: 10.1109/ISUMA.2003.1236145

  9. C. Cirillo, K.W. Axhausen, Mode choice of complex tours: A panel analysis, Arbeitsberichte Verkehrs- und Raumplanung, vol. 142 (Zurich: Institut fr Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassenund Eisenbahnbau (IVT), ETH Zurich, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Daly, S. Zachary, Improved multiple choice models, in Identifying and measuring the determinants of mode choice, ed. by D. Hensher, Q. Dalvi (Teakfield, London, 1979), pp. 335–357

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Dell’Orco, G. Circella, D. Sassanelli, A hybrid approach to combine fuzziness and randomness in travel choice prediction. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185(2007), 648–658 (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M.J.I. Gaudry, Dogit and logit models of travel mode choice in Montreal. Can. J. Econ. 13, 268–279 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M.J.I. Gaudry, M.G. Degenais, The dogit model. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 13, 105–111 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagan, M.T., and M. Menhaj (1994) Training feed-forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 5(6), 989–993

    Google Scholar 

  15. D.A. Hensher, T.T. Ton, A comparison of the predictive potential of artificial neural networks and nested logit models for commuter mode choice. Transp. Res. Part E: Log. Transp. Rev. 36(3), 155–172 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M.G. Karlaftis, E.I. Vlahogianni, Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol., 19(3), 387–399

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. J. Klir, B. Yuan. Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications (Prentice Hall, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. McCulloch, W. Pitts, A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 7, 115–133 (1943)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. D. McFadden, in Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. by P. Zarembka (Academic Press, New York, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.G. McNally, in The Four Step Model, ed. by D.A. Hensher, K.J. Button Handbook of Transport Modeling (Pergamon Publishing, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. E.J. Miller, M.J. Roorda, J.A. Carrasco, A tour-based model of travel mode choice. Transportation 32(4), 399–422 (2005). doi:10.1007/s11116-004-7962-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M.F. Moller, A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks 6, 525–533 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sho-ichiro Nakayama, Jun-ichi Takayama, Junya Nakai, Kazuki Nagao, Semi-dynamic traffic assignment model with mode and route choices under stochastic travel times. J. Adv. Transp. 46(3), 269–281 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Nijkamp, A. Reggiani, T. Tritapepe, Modelling inter-urban transport flows in Italy: a comparison between neural network analysis and logit analysis. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 4(6), 323–338 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dongjoo Park, Seungjae Lee, Chansung Kim, Changho Choi, Chungwon Lee, Access mode choice behaviors of water transportation: a case of Bangkok. J.Adv. Transp. 44(1), 19–33 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. I. Rasmidatta, Mode Choice Models for Long Distance Travel in USA, PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, USA, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Reggiani, T. Tritapepe, Neural Networks and Logit Models Applied to Commuters Mobility in the Metropolitan Area of Milan, in Neural Networks in Transport Systems, ed. by V. Himanen, P. Nijkamp, A. Reggiani (Ashgate, Aldershot, 2000), pp. 111–129

    Google Scholar 

  28. D. Shmueli, I. Salomon, D. Shefer, Neural network analysis of travel behavior: evaluating tools for prediction. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 4(3), 151–166 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. TfL (Transport for London) (2011) Travel in London. Supplementary Report: London Travel Demand. Survey (LTDS), Retrieved on Dec 7, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  30. X. Wu, V. Kumar, J.R. Quinlan, J. Ghosh, Q. Yang, H. Motoda, G.J. McLachlan, A. Ng, B. Liu, P.S. Yu, Z. Zhou, M. Steinbach, D.J. Hand, D. Steinberg, Top 10 algorithms in data mining. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 14(1), 1–37 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Xie, J. Lu, E. Parkany, Work travel mode choice modeling using data mining: decision trees and neural networks. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board (1854), 50–61

    Google Scholar 

  32. G. Yaldi, M.A.P. Taylor, W. Yue, Examining the possibility of fuzzy set theory application in travel demand modelling. J. East. Asia Soc. Transp. Stud. 8, 579–592 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  33. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy Sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nagesh Shukla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shukla, N., Ma, J., Wickramasuriya, R., Huynh, N., Perez, P. (2016). Modelling Mode Choice of Individual in Linked Trips with Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Representation. In: Shanmuganathan, S., Samarasinghe, S. (eds) Artificial Neural Network Modelling. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 628. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28495-8_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28493-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28495-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics