Abstract
In this chapter we discuss the essential role of science, technology, engineering, art, and math (STEAM) in the education of all young children in inclusive preschool settings where children with and without disabilities learn together. Effective STEAM instruction for all children occurs when teachers value children’s active engagement in learning and are able to plan and implement activities focusing on STEAM content and processes as well as children’s motivation to learn. We begin by reviewing effective instructional approaches for STEAM in preschool. We discuss the importance of intentional teaching in early education settings, particularly with regard to the needs of young children with disabilities. A focus on intentional teaching leads us to a more comprehensive approach or framework for engaging early educators in systematically planning for support for young children with disabilities. We use our work in Children’s School Success (CSS) (Children’s school success: An experimental study of a school readiness curriculum, Bloomington, IN, 2003) and Children’s School Success Plus (CSS+; Children’s school success: A framework for inclusive education, Baltimore, MD, in preparation) to highlight key instructional strategies for science and math learning in early childhood while also directing the reader to other researches that underlie these points. CSS+ is based on a series of grant-funded projects in which we worked with preschool teachers as research partners to develop and test the efficacy of an integrated comprehensive preschool curriculum framework designed to meet the needs of preschool children at risk for school failure. We developed the CSS+ curriculum framework that we describe in this chapter to guide teachers’ thinking about STEAM activities that support children’s readiness for school learning, especially with regard to needs of children who have or are at risk for disabilities. The classroom in which Cathy, Anna, and Sherry work is revisited throughout the chapter to provide specific examples about how the curriculum framework can be used to develop STEAM activities to support learning for all children. The descriptions of the three preschool teachers and their classroom are based on teachers we came to know through CSS+.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, M. J., Foorman, B. R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children. A classroom curriculum. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Brenneman, K., Stevenson-Boyd, J., & Frede, E. C. (2009). Math and science in preschool: Policies and practice (Preschool policy brief, Vol. 19). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
Butera, G., Friesen, A., Palmer, S., Horn, E., Lieber, J., Hanson, M. & Czaja, C. (2014). I can figure this out!: Integrating math problem-solving and critical thinking in early education curriculum. Young Children, 69(1), 70–77.
Butera, G., Palmer, S. B., Lieber, J., & Schneider, R. (2011). Helping preschool children learn about mathematics: Lessons learned from Children’s School Success. In N. L. Gallenstein & J. Hodges (Eds.), Mathematics for all: Instructional strategies to assist students with special learning needs (pp. 121–129). Olney, MD: Association for Childhood Education International.
Buysse, V., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., Soukakou, E., LaForett, D. R., Fettig, A., & Schaaf, J. M. (2013). Recognition and Response: A model of Response to Intervention to promote academic learning in early education. In V. Buysse & E. Peisner-Feinberg (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention in early childhood (pp. 69–84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
CAST. (2009). What is universal design for learning? Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/research/udl/index.html.
Castle, S., Deniz, C. B., & Tortora, M. (2005). Flexible grouping and student learning in a high-needs school. Education and Urban Society, 37(2), 139–150. doi:10.1177/0013124504270787.
Chen, J. Q., & McCray, J. (2012). A conceptual framework for teacher professional development: The whole teacher approach. NHSA Dialog., 15(1), 113–121.
Chien, N.C., Howes, C., Burchinal, M., Pianta, R., Ritchie, S., Bryant, D., … Barbarin, O. (2010). Children’s classroom engagement and gains in academic and social-emotional outcomes across pre-kindergarten. Child Development, 81(5), 1534–1549.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2003). DLM early childhood express math resources guide. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2012). Mathematics learning, assessment and curriculum. In R. C. Pianta (Ed.), Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 217–239). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Coleman, M. R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for your children at-risk for learning disabilities. Full Report. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, FPG Child Development Institute.
Conn-Powers, M., Cross, A. F., Traub, E. K., & Hutter-Pishgahi, L. (2006). The universal design of early education: Moving forward for all children. Beyond the Journal: Young Children. Retrieved from http://journal.naeyc.org//btj/200609/ConnPowersBTJ.
Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Schultz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120, 341–349.
Copley, J. V. (2010). The young child and mathematics (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
DeVries, R. (2001). Constructivist education in preschool and elementary school: The sociomoral atmosphere as the first educational goal. In S. L. Golbeck (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on early childhood education: Reframing dilemmas in research and practice (pp. 153–180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Diamond, K. E., Justice, L. M., Siegler, R. S., & Snyder, P. A. (2013). Synthesis of IES research on early intervention and early childhood education (NCSER 2013–3001). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Duncan, C. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., … Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428.
Dunlap, G., dePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., & Gomez, A. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 515–524.
Dunn, L. M. & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Epstein, A. S. (2014). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Fox, L., Dunlap, G., Hemmeter, M. L., Joseph, G., & Strain, P. (2003). The teaching pyramid: A model for supporting social competence and preventing challenging behavior in young children. Young Children, 58(4), 48–53.
French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 138–149.
French, L., & Conezio, K. (2011–2014). The ScienceStart! Curriculum. Retrieved from http://literasci.com/.
French, L., Conezio, K., & Boynton, M. (2003). Using science as the hub of an integrated early childhood curriculum. The ScienceStart! Curriculum. In Proceedings of the symposium in honor of Lillian G. Katz (pp. 303–312). Champaign, IL: ERIC.
Gelman, R., Brenneman, K., Macdonald, G., & Roman, M. (2010). Preschool pathways to science (PrePS): Facilitating scientific ways of thinking, talking, doing, and understanding. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Ginsburg, H. P., Ertle, B., & Presser, A. L. (2013). Math curriculum and instruction for young children. In V. Buysee & E. S. Peisner-Feinberg (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention in early childhood (pp. 251–265). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Ginsburg, H. P., Kaplan, R., Cannon, J., Cordero, M., Eisenband, J., Galanter, M., & Morgenlander, M. (2006). Helping early childhood educators to teach mathematics. In M. Zaslow & I. Martinez-Beck (Eds.), Critical issues in early childhood professional development (pp. 171–202). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Ginsburg, H. P., Pappas, S., & Seo, K. (2001). Everyday mathematical knowledge: Asking young children what is developmentally appropriate. In S. L. Golbeck (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on early childhood education: Reframing dilemmas in research and practice (pp. 181–219). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Gonzalez, H. B. & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service. R542642.
Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A. C., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264.
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Atwater, J., Goldstein, H., Kaminski, R., & McConnell, S. R. (2012). Is a response to intervention (RTI) approach to preschool language and early literacy instruction needed? Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 33(8), 48–64.
Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., Baggett, K., Buzhardt, J., Walker, D., & Terry, B. (2008). Best practices in integrating progress monitoring and response-to-intervention concepts into early childhood systems. In A. Thomas, J. Grimes, & J. Gruba (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 535–548). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychology.
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. CAST: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2876.
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2007). The productivity argument for investing in young children. Review of Agricultural Economics, 29(3), 446–493.
Horn, E., Lieber, J., Sandall, S., Schwartz, I., & Li, S. (2002). Supporting young children’s IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 208–223.
Horn, E. M., Palmer, S. B., Butera, G. D., & Lieber, J. A. (2016). Six steps to inclusive preschool curriculum: A UDL-based framework for children’s school success. Baltimore, MD: Brookes
Horn, E., Palmer, S. B., Lieber, J., & Butera, G. (2010). Children’s school success plus (+) early intervention & early childhood special ed. Goal 2: Development project. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Inan, H. Z., Trundle, K. C., & Kantor, R. (2010). Understanding natural sciences education in a Reggio Emilia-inspired preschool. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 1186–1208.
Jones, I., Lake, V. E., & Dagli, U. (2005). Integration of science and mathematics methods and preservice teachers’ understanding of constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25, 165–172.
Klein, A., Starkey, P., & Ramirez, A. (2002). Pre-K mathematics curriculum. Glendale, IL: Scott Foresman.
Koegel, L., Singh, A., & Koegel, R. (2010). Improving motivation for academics in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1057–1066.
Koralek, D. (2005). Introduction. In D. Koralek’s (Ed.), Spotlight on young children and the creative arts (pp. 2–3). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
LaMore, R., Root-Bernstein, R., Root-Bernstein, M., Schweitzer, J. H., Lawron, J. L., Roraback, E., … Fernandez, L. (2013). Arts and crafts: Critical to economic innovation. Economic Development Quarterly, 27, 221–29. doi:10.1177/0891242413486786.
Mace, R. L., Hardie, G. L., & Place, J. P. (1996). Accessible environments: Toward universal design. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Retrieved from http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/pubs_p/pud.htm.
Mantzicopoulos, Y., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2009). Scientific literacy project. Retrieved from http://www.purduescientificliteracyproject.org.
McWilliam, R. (2010). Routines-based early intervention: Supporting young children and their families. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Moomaw, S., & Davis, J. A. (2013). STEM comes to preschool. In P. Ashbrook & I. Chalufour (Eds.), Spotlight on young children: Exploring science (pp. 17–22). Washington, DC: NAEYC.
NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood programs serving children from birth to age 8: A position statement adapted 2009. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/PSDAP.pdf.
NAEYC (National Association for the Education of Young Children) & NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. A joint position paper. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/psmath.pdf.
National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum. (2003). Access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities: A brief legal interpretation. Retrieved from http://www.cast.org/ncac/downloads/curriculum_access_legal.pdf.
NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). (2007). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence. Reston, VA: Author.
Notari-Syverson, A., & Sadler, F. H. (2008). Math is for everyone: Strategies for supporting mathematical competence in young children. Young Exceptional Children, 11, 2–16.
NSTA (National Science Teacher Association). (2014). NSTA position paper: Early childhood science education. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/docs/PositionStatementEarlyChildhood.pdf.
Odom, S. L. (this volume). The role of theory in early childhood special education and early intervention. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, & S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education (pp. 21–36). New York, NY: Springer.
Odom, S. L., Butera, G., Diamond, K., Hanson, M. J., Horn, E., Lieber, J., & Palmer, S. (2003). Children’s school success: An experimental study of a school readiness curriculum. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.
Peterson, S. M., & French, L. (2008). Supporting young children’s explanations through inquiry science in preschool. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 395–408.
Pretti-Frontczak, K., & Bricker, D. (2004). An activity-based approach to early intervention (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Rose, D., & Meyer, A. (2006). A practical reader in universal design for learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Samarapungavan, A., Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2008). Learning science through inquiry in kindergarten. Science Education, 92(5), 868–908.
Sandall, S., Schwartz, I., Joseph, G., Lieber, J., Horn, E. M., Wolery, R., … Chous, H. (2008). Building blocks for teaching preschoolers with special needs (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Starkey, P., Klein, A. l., & Wakeley, A. (2004). Enhancing young children’s mathematical knowledge through a pre-kindergarten mathematics intervention. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 99–120.
Tomlinson, C. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervisions and Curriculum Development.
Trundle, K. C., & Saches, M. (2012). Science and early education. In R. C. Pianta (Ed.), Handbook of early childhood education (pp. 240–258). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Varol, F., Farran, D., Bilbrey, C., Vorhaus, E. A., & Hofer, K. G. (2012). Improving mathematics instruction for early childhood teachers: Professional development components that work. NHSA Dialog, 15(1), 24–40.
Vituello, V. E., Booren, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Williford, A. P. (2012). Variation in children’s engagement throughout a day in preschool: Relations to classroom and child factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 210–220.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webster-Stratton, C. (2000). The incredible years training series. Retrieved from http://incredibleyears.com/.
Winton, P. J. (this volume). Taking stock and moving forward: Implementing quality early childhood inclusive practices. In B. Reichow, B. A. Boyd, E. E. Barton, S. L. Odom (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood special education (pp. 57–74). New York, NY: Springer.
Acknowledgment
This work was funded in part by a grant to the Kansas University Center for Research at the University of Kansas from the Institute of Educational Sciences (IES), U.S. Department of Education; through grant R324A100239—Children’s School Success Plus (CSS+).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Butera, G., Horn, E.M., Palmer, S.B., Friesen, A., Lieber, J. (2016). Understanding Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics (STEAM). In: Reichow, B., Boyd, B., Barton, E., Odom, S. (eds) Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28492-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28492-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28490-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28492-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)