Skip to main content

Taking Stock and Moving Forward: Implementing Quality Early Childhood Inclusive Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education

Abstract

The long-standing and widespread support for the concept of inclusion of young children with disabilities is manifested in decades of legislation and policy, strongly held professional and family values, and a large body of research (Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change. Baltimore, MD, 2001). In spite of that support, children across the country have uneven opportunities to experience high quality inclusion in natural environments and regular education settings. Data suggests that progress has stalled in implementing the concept in a consistent and sustainable way (Odom, Buysse, & Soukakou, Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 344–356, 2011). To address the current issues related to early childhood preschool inclusion, this chapter begins with a description of this history and current context of inclusive practices within early childhood special education (ECSE). A description of the current implementation of inclusion follows. An approach to addressing the current concerns about early childhood inclusion, using an implementation science framework, identifies the inclusive practices with the strongest evidence, the implementation drivers or levers for change in increasing likelihood that those practices are implemented, and an action agenda for improving the likelihood that young children with disabilities experience high quality inclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a full accounting of the legislative history of inclusion in the USA, see McCormick (2014).

  2. 2.

    More information about and resources related to the joint position statement on inclusion and each of these essential features can be found on the web site for the National Professional Development Center on Inclusion (http://fpg.unc.edu/sites/fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/reports-and-policy-briefs/DEC_NAEYC_EarlyChildhoodInclusion.pdf).

  3. 3.

    We use the following definition of the workforce from Winton et al. (2016): Individuals working directly with children as well as those (faculty and PD providers) who work with early childhood teachers to advance their competence in supporting children’s learning and development. This definition, which is inclusive of teachers addressing the learning and development of children from birth to the start of kindergarten in center- and home-based programs, includes child care, Early Head Start/Head Start, preschool/Pre-K, early intervention (birth to three programs for infants and toddlers with or at risk for disabilities under Part C of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and early childhood special education for preschool children with disabilities (Section 619 of IDEA).

References

  • Bailey, D. B., & Winton, P. J. (1987). Stability and change in parents’ expectations about mainstreaming. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7, 73–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, E., & Smith, B. (2014). Fact sheet of research on preschool inclusion. Denver, CO: Pyramid Plus: The Colorado Center for Social Emotional Competence and Inclusion. Retrieved from http://www.pyramidplus.org/.

  • Bennett, T., DeLuca, D., & Bruns, D. (1997). Putting inclusion into practice: Perspectives of teachers and parents. Exceptional Children, 64, 115–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, M. B., Mogro-Wilson, C. M., Stayton, V. D., & Dietrich, S. L. (2009). The national status of in-service professional development systems for early intervention and early childhood special education practitioners. Infants & Young Children, 22(1), 13–20. doi:10.1097/01.IYC.0000343333.49775.f8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, V. (2011). Access, participation, and supports: The defining features of high-quality inclusion. Zero to Three Journal, 31(4), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, V., Wesley, P. W., Keyes, L., & Bailey, D. B. (1996). Assessing the comfort zone of child care teachers in serving young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 20, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, V., Winton, P. J., Rous, B., Epstein, D., & Lim, C.-I. (2012). Evidence-based practice: Foundation for the CONNECT 5-step learning cycle™ in professional development. Zero to Three Journal, 32(4), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buysse, V., Winton, P. J., & Rous, B. (2009). Reaching consensus on a definition of professional development for the early childhood field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, L. K., Cochran, D. C., Christensen, K. A., Dinnebeil, L. A., Gallagher, P. A., Lifter, K., … Spino, M. (2012). The alignment of CEC/DEC and NAEYC personnel preparation standards. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32(1), 52–63. doi:10.1177/0271121412437047.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, F., Early, D. M., & Winton, P. J. (2005). Early childhood teacher preparation in special education at 2- and 4-year institutions of higher education. Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DEC/NAEYC. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Chapel Hill, NC: FPG Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://fpg.unc.edu/sites/fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/reports-and-policy-briefs/DEC_NAEYC_EarlyChildhoodInclusion.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delisle, D., & Yudin, M. (2014, May). Joint letter to chief state school officers. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/rda/050914rda-lette-to-chiefs-final.pdf

  • Diamond, K. E., & LeFurgy, W. G. (1994). Attitudes of parents of preschool children toward integration. Early Education and Development, 5, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Division for Early Childhood (DEC). (2014a, April). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Retrieved from http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices.

  • Division for Early Childhood (DEC). (2014b, December). Leadership in early intervention and early childhood special education: DEC position statement [draft]. Los Angeles, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Early, D., & Winton, P. (2001). Preparing the workforce: Early childhood teacher preparation at 2- and 4-year institutions of higher education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, E., Soodak, L., Winton, P., & Turnbull, A. (2001). “I wish it wouldn’t all depend upon me”: Research on families and early childhood inclusion. In M. Guralnick (Ed.), Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change (pp. 127–158). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature (FMHI Publication #231). Tampa, FL: The National Implementation Research Network, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida. Retrieved from http://www.fpg.unc.edu/~nirn/resources/detail.cfm?resourceID=31.

  • Goffin, S. G. (2013). Early childhood education for a new era: Leading for our profession. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffin, S. G., & Janke, M. (2013, May). Early childhood education leadership development compendium: A view of the landscape (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.goffinstrategygroup.com.

  • Guralnick, M. J. (Ed.). (2001). Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, T., Metz, A., & Martinez-Beck, I. (Eds.). (2013). Applying implementation science in early childhood programs and systems. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, T., Clifford, R., & Cryer, D. (2005). Early childhood environment rating scale (Rev. ed., updated) (ECERS-R). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebbeler, K., & Kahn, L. (2014). What practitioners need to know about measuring EI and ECSE outcomes. Presentation at 2014 Division for Early Childhood (DEC) annual conference, St. Louis, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henninger, W. R., & Gupta, S. S. (2014). How do children benefit from inclusion? In S. S. Gupta (Ed.), First steps to preschool inclusion (pp. 33–57). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horm, D., Hyson, M., & Winton, P. (2013). Research on early childhood teacher education: Evidence from three domains and recommendations for moving forward. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 34, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, M., & Squires, J. (2014, November). QRIS and inclusion [fastFact]. Retrieved from http://ceelo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/ceelo_fast_fact_qris_inclusion.pdf.

  • Hyson, M., Horm, D. M., & Winton, P. J. (2012). Higher education for early childhood educators and outcomes for young children: Pathways toward greater effectiveness. In R. Pianta, L. Justice, S. Barnett, & S. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of early education (pp. 553–583). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isner, T., Tout, K., Zaslow, M., Soli, M., Quinn, K., Rothenberg, L., & Burkhauser, M. (2011). Coaching in early care and education programs and Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS): Identifying promising features. Washington, DC: Child Trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, S. L. (2013, December). Leadership for young children. Presentation at the Early Childhood Personnel Center Leadership Institute, Hartford, CT. Retrieved from http://www.ecpcta.org/pdfs/Leadership_FINAL_12-9-13.pdf.

  • Kasari, C., Freeman, S. F. N., Bauminger, N., & Alkin, M. C. (1999). Parental perspectives on inclusion: Effects of autism and Down syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, L. (2014). Perspectives, policies and practices. In M. J. Noonan & L. McCormick (Eds.), Teaching young children with disabilities in natural environments (2nd ed., pp. 1–26). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, R., Lang, L., Vandiviere, P., Angell, R., Collins, L., & Underdown, G. (1995). Satisfaction and struggles: Family perceptions of early intervention services. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (Position statement). Retrieved from http://www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/position%20statement%20Web.pdf.

  • National Professional Development Center on Inclusion (NPDCI). (2008). What do we mean by professional development in the early childhood field? Chapel Hill, NC: FPG Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Professional Development Center on Inclusion (NPDCI). (2009). Research synthesis points on early childhood inclusion. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, Author. Available at http://npdci.fpg.unc.edu.

  • National Professional Development Center on Inclusion (NPDCI). (2011). Research synthesis points on quality inclusive practices. Chapel Hill, NC: FPG Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina. Retrieved from http://npdci.fpg.unc.edu/sites/npdci.fpg.unc.edu/files/resources/NPDCI-ResearchSynthesisPointsInclusivePractices-2011_0.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., Buysse, V., & Soukakou, E. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 344–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., & Schwartz, I. (2001). So what do we know from all this? Synthesis points of research on preschool inclusion. In S. Odom (Ed.), Widening the circle: Including children with disabilities in preschool programs (pp. 154–174). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odom, S. L., Vitztum, J., Wolery, R., Lieber, J., Sandall, S., Hanson, M. J., & Horn, E. (2004). Preschool inclusion in the United States: A review of research from an ecological systems perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4, 17–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Program Research and Evaluation (OPRE). (2013). Number and characteristics of early care and education (ECE) teachers and caregivers: Initial findings from the National Survey of Early Care and Education. OPRE Report 38. Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/index.html.

  • Pianta, R. C., La Paro, K., & Hamre, B. K. (2008). Classroom assessment scoring system. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson-Gibbs, A. M., & Klein, M. D. (2014). Supporting young children with disabilities in inclusive early childhood education. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, K., Matthews, H., Blank, H., & Ewen, D. (2012). A count for quality: Child care center directors on rating and improvement systems. Retrieved from www.clasp.org/admin/site/publications/files/ACountforQualityQRISReport.pdf.

  • Soodak, L. C., & Erwin, E. J. (2000). Valued member or tolerated participant: Parents’ experiences in inclusive early childhood settings. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 25, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soukakou, E. P. (2012). Measuring quality in inclusive preschool classrooms: Development and validation of the Inclusive Classroom Profile (ICP). Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 478–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soukakou, E., Winton, P., West, T., Sideris, J., & Rucker, L. (2015). Measuring the quality of inclusive practices: Findings from the Inclusive Classroom Profile (ICP) pilot. Journal of Early Intervention, 36, 223–240. doi:10.1177/1053815115569732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, A., & Winton, P. (1983). A comparison of specialized and mainstreamed preschools from the perspectives of mothers of handicapped children. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 8, 57–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Education., Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services., & Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). (2014). 36th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2014. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services., Administration for Children and Families., Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE). (2013). Number and characteristics of early care and education teachers and caregivers: Initial findings from the national survey of early care and education (OPRE report 2013-38). Retrieved from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/nsece_wf_brief_102913_0.pdf.

  • U.S. Departments of Education., & Health and Human Services. (2015). Policy statement on inclusion of children with disabilities in early childhood programs. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehurst, G. J. (2002, March 5). Research on teacher preparation and professional development. Address to White House Conference on Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/admins/tchrqual/learn/preparingteachersconference/whitehurst.html.

  • Winton, P., Buysse, V., Rous, B., Lim, C.-I., & Epstein, D. (2013). CONNECTing evidence-based practice and teacher research. Voices of Practitioners, 8(2), 1–7. National Association for the Education of Young Children.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winton, P., Snyder, P., & Goffin, S. (2016). Beyond the status quo: Rethinking professional development for early childhood teachers. In L. Couse & S. Recchia (Eds.), The handbook of early childhood teacher education. Oxford, United Kingdom: Routledge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winton, P., Turnbull, A. P., Blacher, J. B., & Salkind, N. (1983). Mainstreaming in the kindergarten classroom: Perspectives of parents of handicapped and nonhandicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 6, 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolery, M., Pauca, T., Brashers, M. S., & Grant, S. (2000). Quality of inclusive experiences measure. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Melissa Van Dyke, Mary Lee Porterfield, Lia Rucker, and Sari Gupta for their comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pamela J. Winton .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winton, P.J. (2016). Taking Stock and Moving Forward: Implementing Quality Early Childhood Inclusive Practices. In: Reichow, B., Boyd, B., Barton, E., Odom, S. (eds) Handbook of Early Childhood Special Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28492-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics