Skip to main content

Comparison of Real Options Analysis and Other Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Real Options Illustrated

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Finance ((BRIEFSFINANCE))

  • 1370 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a comparison of the real options valuation approach, using the contingent claims approach, to two traditional valuation methods. The first traditional valuation approach discussed in this chapter is the NPV analysis, which also includes the contingent claims approach and the second is the decision tree analysis. Through this comparative study, it is shown when real options provide better results than traditional approaches. This will be illustrated on the basis of Copeland and Antikarov (2001) and these examples are further elaborated by the use of other literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This probability represents a real-world probability measure to obtain the upstate and downstate volatilities. This is in contrast to the risk-neutral probability, which is used for risk-neutral real option-pricing. In case of risk-neutral probabilities, cash flows are adjusted in such a way that these are discounted at the risk-free rate instead of the WACC.

References

  • Copeland T, Antikarov V (2001) Real options a practitioners guide. TEXERE, New York/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz ES, Trigeorgis L (eds) (2001) Real options and investment under uncertainty classical readings and recent contributions. The MIT Press, Cambridge/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Putten AB, MacMillan IC (2004) Making real options really work. Harv Bus Rev 82(12):134

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang A, Halal W (2010) Comparison of real asset valuation models: a literature review. Int J Bus Manage 5(5):14–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, L. (2016). Comparison of Real Options Analysis and Other Methods. In: Real Options Illustrated. SpringerBriefs in Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28310-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics