Abstract
The Ku-ring-gai community have long expressed a strong desire to keep their suburbs green. When asked, most people comment that they moved to the area to live in a bushland setting. Given this enduring set of values, it is interesting that Council spends a great deal of time fielding complaints from residents about nature’s miscreants, those birds, animals and plants that fail to respect property boundaries or intrude into the lives of residents in the bushland interface areas. This paper examines one such dilemma challenging public land managers; when people and nature come into conflict. The issue in question is that of a long standing flying fox camp in Ku-ring-gai and the problems arising from the close proximity of these animals to local residents. It is a debate that has passionate proponents on both sides.
The flying fox management issue provides an insight into the juxtaposition between people who want to live close to nature but on strictly human terms. The strategies proposed to keep the peace between the residents and the champions of the flying fox is an instructive environmental management example that is likely to become increasingly common as pressure on the remaining natural resources in urban areas continues to rise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Biodiversity Strategy (2006) 2006 Ku-ring-gai Biodiversity Strategy, May
Blanchi R, Leonard J (2005) Investigation of bushfire attach mechanisms resulting in house loss in the ACT bushfire 2003. Bushfire CRC
Brown H, Katscherian D, Carter M, Spickett J (2013) Cool communities: urban trees, environment and health. World Health Organisation and Curtin University. http://ehia.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/CoolCommunities.pdf. Accessed 8 May 2014
Eby P, Roberts B (2011) Managing flying fox camps in New South Wales: background and recent experiences, Griffith School of the Environment, Griffith University Qld
Ku-ring-gai Council (1991) The Storm, a joint publication by Ku-ring-gai Council and Playbill Pty Ltd, November
Ku-ring-gai Council (2012) Management and restoration of flying-fox camps – guidelines and recommendations, Ku-ring-gai Council
Ku-ring-gai Flying fox Management Plan, Ku-ring-gai Council (2013)
Ku-ring-gai Flying Fox Reserve Plan of Management (2013) Ku-ring-gai Council
NSW DPI (2014) Hendra virus – frequently asked questions. NSW Department of Primary Industries, Agriculture. http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/agriculture/livestock/horses/health/general/hendra-virus/faqs#Why-are-there-so-many-more-cases-of-Hendra-virus-now-than-in-the-past?. Accessed 8 May 2014
NSW OEH (2014) Flying-fox camp management policy 2014 – consultation draft, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage
NSW RFS (2011) Development assessment and planning – best practice guide to bushfire protection, upgrade of existing buildings. Version 1/25 Feb 2011
North Shore Times (2013) Residents near the Ku-ring-gai flying fox reserve in Gordon are being driven batty by the noise, by Danielle Nicastri, North Shore Times, 28 Aug 2013. http://dailytelegraph.com.au/newslocal/north-shore/residents-near-the ku-ring-gai-flying-fox-reserve-ingordon-are-being-driven-batty-by-the-noise/story-fingr8h9d-1226705947931. Accessed 10 May 2014
Pongsiri MJ, Roman J, Ezenwa V, Goldberg TL, Koren HS, Newbold S, Ostfield R, Pattanayak S, Salkeld DL (2009) Biodiversity loss affects global disease ecology. BioScience 59:945–954. ISSN 0006-3568, electronic ISSN 1525-3244. © 2009 American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Qld EHP (2014) The importance of flying foxes. Queensland Department of Environment and Heritage. https://www.ehp.qld.gov.au/wildlife/livingwith/flyingfoxes/importance.html. Accessed 14 May 2014
Roberts B, Eby P (2013) Review of past flying-fox dispersal actions between 1990–2013. Unpublished report
Roberts BJ, Eby P, Catterall CP, Kanowski J, Bennett G (2013) The outcomes and costs of relocating flying-fox camps: insights from the case of Maclean, Australia. In: Law B, Eby P, Lunney D, Lumsden L (eds) The biology and conservation of Australasian Bats. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, Mosman. 2011 pp 277–287
SIEFA Index (2012) The socio-economic indexes for Australia, Census of Population and Housing, Australia, 2011 (cat. no. 2033.0.55.001)
Smith G, Scott J (2006) Living cities – an urban myth? Rosenberg Publications, Sydney
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott, J., Kikken, M., Rose, M., Colyer, P. (2016). Nimbyism and Nature: Whose Backyard Is It Anyway?. In: Maheshwari, B., Thoradeniya, B., Singh, V.P. (eds) Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 72. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28110-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28112-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)