Abstract
Traditional defense acquisition frameworks are often too large, complex, and slow to acquire information technology (IT) capabilities effectively. Defense acquisition organizations for years have been concerned about the lengthy IT development timelines and given the pace of change in operations and technology, it is critical to look for new strategies to acquire IT for defense systems. Over the last decade, agile software development emerged as a leading model across industry with growing adoption and success. Agile is centered on small development Teams delivering small, frequent releases of capabilities, with active user involvement. From a planning and execution viewpoint, agile emphasizes an iterative approach with each iteration informing the next. The focus is less on extensive upfront planning for entire programs and more on responsiveness to internal and external changes, such as operations, technology, and budgets. Based on US and Italian experiences, this paper discusses some of the common challenges in implementing agile practices and recommended solutions to overcome these barriers.
Angelo Messina: Deputy Chief Italian Army General Staff Logistic Department and DSSEA Secretary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Lapham et al. [10].
- 2.
Northern et al. [15].
- 3.
US Government Accountability Office [8].
- 4.
Lapham et al. [11].
- 5.
Broadus (January–Feburary [2]).
- 6.
Ibid.
- 7.
Defense Acquisition University (DAU) [4].
- 8.
Lapham, DoD agile Adoption, [9].
- 9.
Modigliani and Chang (March [14]).
- 10.
Lapham et al. [10].
- 11.
A timebox is a fixed time period allocated to each planned activity. For example, within agile, a Sprint is often timeboxed to a 4- to 6-week-time period or a release is timeboxed for a 4- to 6-month time frame.
- 12.
US Government Accountability Office [8].
- 13.
Defense Information Systems Agency [5].
- 14.
Modigliani and Chang (March [14]).
- 15.
See Footnote 14.
References
Balter BJ (Fall 2011). Towards a more agile government: the case for rebooting federal IT procurement. Publ Contract Law J
Broadus W (January–Feburary 2013) The challenges of being agile in DoD. Defense AT&L Mag, 5–9
Cotugno F, Messina A (2014) Implementing SCRUM in the army general staff environment. The 3rd international conference in software engineering for defence applications—SEDA, Roma, Italy, 22–23 September 2014
Defense Acquisition University (DAU) (2015, March 20) Milestone document identification (MDID). Retrieved from DAU: https://dap.dau.mil/mdid/Pages/Default.aspx?ms=2&acat=2&acatsub=1&source=All&type=chart0
Defense Information Systems Agency (2015, March 20) GCSS-J. Retrieved from Defense Information Systems Agency: http://www.disa.mil/Mission-Support/Command-and-Control/GCSS-J/About
Defense Science Board (2009) Report of the defense science board task force on: department of defense policies and procedures for the acquisition of information technology. Retrieved from Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology: www.acq.osd.mil/dsb/reports/ADA498375.pdf
Duquette J, Bloom M (2008) Transitioning agile/rapid acquisition initiatives to the warfighter. The MITRE Corporation, Virginia
U.S. Government Accountability Office (2012) Software development: effective practices and federal challenges in applying agile methods (GAO-12-681), U.S. Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC
Lapham MA (2012, January/February) DoD agile adoption. Retrieved from Cross Talk: http://www.crosstalkonline.org/storage/issue-archives/2012/201201/201201-Lapham.pdf
Lapham MA., Williams R, Hammons C, Burton D, Schenker A (2010) Considerations for using agile in DoD Acquisition. Software Engineering Institute, USA
Lapham M, Miller S, Adams L, Brown N, Hackemarck B, Hammons C, Schenker A et al. (2011) Agile methods: selected DoD management and acquisition concerns. Software Engineering Institute, USA
Messina A (2014) Adopting Agile methodology in mission critical software production. Consultation on Cloud Computing and Software closing workshop, Bruxelles, 4 November 2014
Messina A, Cotugno F (2014) Adapting SCRUM to the Italian army: methods and (open) tools. The 10th international conference on open source systems, San Jose, Costa Rica, 6–9 May 2014. ISBN 978-3-642-55127-7
Modigliani P, Chang S (March 2014) Defense agile acquisition guide. The MITRE Corporation, Virginia
Northern C, Mayfield K, Benito R, Casagni M (2010) Handbook for implementing agile in department of defense information technology acquisition. The MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA
Office of the Secretary of Defense (2010, November) A new approach for delivering information technology capabilities to the department of defense. Retrieved from Office of the Deputy Chief Management Officer: http://dcmo.defense.gov/documents/OSD%2013744-10%20-%20804%20Report%20to%20Congress%20.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chang, S.J., Messina, A., Modigliani, P. (2016). How Agile Development Can Transform Defense IT Acquisition. In: Ciancarini, P., Sillitti, A., Succi, G., Messina, A. (eds) Proceedings of 4th International Conference in Software Engineering for Defence Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27896-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27896-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27894-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27896-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)