Skip to main content

How to Cross the Border from R to D? The Example of Conception of New Medical Devices

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies (BIOSTEC 2015)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 574))

  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

The border between Research and Development for a new medical device is often unclear due to non-linear process of its development and frequent feedbacks from trials in clinical settings to a new conception of the product. Sometimes researchers under-estimate these translational studies since they do not lead to an increase of fundamental knowledge. However, and especially in the field of medical devices, users have to face specific difficulties due to the variability of the biological systems under study. Results obtained in translational research often depend on this variability and new questions or scientific obstacles arise from the confrontation to the real world. In order to address these new challenges, reverse translational research is required. Fundamental research is then fuelled by the results of translational research. A useful model of medical device development is presented here through several examples of translational research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. OECD: Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, OECD Paris (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parquin, F., Audry, A., Giens, X.X.V.I.I.: Constraints and specificities of the clinical evaluation of medical devices. Thérapie 67(4), 301–309 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Annex IX from 93/42/EEC concerning medical devices as amended by Directive 2007/47/EC

    Google Scholar 

  4. ISO 14155:2011 Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects - Good clinical practice (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Food and Drugs Administration, Premarket Notification (510 k)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujimoto, J., et al.: Biomedical Optical Imaging. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Sattle, E., Kästle, R., Welzel, J.: Optical coherence tomography in dermatology. J. Biomed. Opt. 18(6), 061224 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robieux, C., Sainthilier, J.M., Vidal, C., et al.: Study of the correlation between the structure of the capillary network of the heel of newborns and pain during screening at birth. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 2144 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wacogne, B., Pieralli, C., Cabodevila, G., Baron, N., Marioli, S., Pazart, L.: Pain and efficiency in neonatal blood sample screenings, New devices for reducing pain and improving blood sample quality. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Biomedical Electronics and Devices. Biodevices, Porto, Portugal, pp. 290–295 (14–17 January 2009). doi:10.5220/0001776902900295

  10. Moreau-Gaudry, A., Pazart, L.: Development of an innovation in health: the cycle CREPS Concept - Research - Evaluation - Product – Care. IRBM 31(1), 12–21 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The studies presented in this paper are funded by public grants, under the European Commission’s 7th Framework Program, or French Health Ministry and French National Agency for Research. We would like to thank all researchers and patients implied in these studies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lionel Pazart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pazart, L. (2015). How to Cross the Border from R to D? The Example of Conception of New Medical Devices. In: Fred, A., Gamboa, H., Elias, D. (eds) Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies. BIOSTEC 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 574. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27707-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27707-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27706-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27707-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics