Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((ELIBT))

  • 712 Accesses

Abstract

Various medical tests are routinely performed in medical practice to establish or confirm a diagnosis and prescribe the right treatment. In some cases, the results of a medical test can reveal a previously undiagnosed condition, which is not related to the current medical condition and the original purpose of the test. Such results, called incidental findings, have sparked a significant debate on whether all of them should be reported back to the patients. In this chapter, we present the debate on the implications and management of incidental findings in the clinic, to offer a heuristic for reaching an ethically desirable outcome on a case-by-case basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Screening conducted on reproductive cells (egg cells and spermatozoids) prior to in vitro fertilisation in order to choose those not carrying variants implicated in disease developments.

  2. 2.

    Testing conducted on an entire population or parts of the population as part of preventive and early diagnosis health interventions.

  3. 3.

    In rare diseases, the number of individuals suffering from the condition in question is so small and the variability among those people consequently so large and that it is difficult to construct the list of the most common symptoms and potential treatments. Characterisation on the molecular level, however, could provide a more stable source of reference for treatment and for diagnostic/prognostic purposes.

  4. 4.

    Many diseases, and cancer in particular, show individual differences in response to currently available treatments. This suggested tailoring the treatment to the individuals by looking at the differences they exhibit in symptoms but more recently on molecular level, and in particular in their genomic sequences.

  5. 5.

    ΔF508 is a deletion (indicated by Greek the letter Δ) of three nucleotides that results in a loss of the amino acid phenylalanine (F) at the 508th position on the protein.

  6. 6.

    We would like to note that incidental findings did not originate with genomics. They first appeared in radiology with radiographic imaging as technology that made it possible to “see”, that is, to detect previously unsuspected health conditions.

  7. 7.

    It could be worth noting that there is also a debate regarding incidental findings that questions the utility of the concept itself, because genome-scale screening itself includes collecting all the variants in one patient; therefore, it is inevitable to discover variants that are unrelated to the original purpose of the test. A more suitable term, according to these authors (see, Allyse and Michie 2013), is ‘secondary findings’. However, as the concept has both historic and analytic utility, it deserves consideration in a handbook of ethical counselling.

  8. 8.

    Exome refers to a part of the genome (genomic sequence) that is expressed in cells/tissues tested—genome is always the same, no matter what tissue/cell or at what point in life, while exome varies from tissue to tissue and from cell to cell and also in time.

  9. 9.

    By clinical utility, we intend that the results clearly identify and/or indicate targets of clinical action. For example, a result that shows the presence of ΔF508 has high clinical utility, as it detects a variant known to be causing cystic fibrosis and suggests treatment options. Contrary to this, a results that shows the presence of genetic variant thus far only shown to be loosely related to a condition in animal models (rats or mice, for example) is of low clinical utility because even though it can strengthen a hypothesis that it is indeed important in that condition and support further research, it does not currently offer prognostic, diagnostic or treatment options.

References

  • Allyse M, Michie M (2013) Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing. Trends Biotechnol 31:439–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg JS, Khoury MJ, Evans JP (2011) Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med 13:499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesecker LG (2012) Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project. Genet Med 14:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn et al (2015) Management of incidental findings in the era of next-generation sequencing. Curr Genomics 16:159–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Heather L et al (2015) Management of incidental findings in the era of next-generation sequencing. Curr Genomics 16:159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RC, Berg JS, Grody WW et al (2013) ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med Official J Am Coll Med Genet 15:565–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RC et al (2012) Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Genet Med 14:405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoppers BM et al (2013) Populations studies: return of research results and incidental findings policy statement. Eur J Hum Genet 21:245–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire AL et al (2013) Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science 340:1047–1048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf SM, Annas GJ, Elias S (2013) Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics. Science 340:1049–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf SM et al (2012) Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived datasets. Genet Med 14:361–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Damjanovicova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Damjanovicova, M. (2016). Incidental Findings. In: Boniolo, G., Sanchini, V. (eds) Ethical Counselling and Medical Decision-Making in the Era of Personalised Medicine. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27690-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27690-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27688-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27690-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics