Skip to main content

Restoration of Pulp-Treated Teeth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Endodontics

Abstract

The restoration of pulpally treated teeth is critical for the longitudinal success of maintaining the teeth within the oral cavity. There are a number of factors when choosing a restoration following pulp therapy such as the position of the tooth within the dental arch, which dictates the masticatory forces expected, as well as esthetics desired upon final restoration. The amount of tooth structure remaining after caries removal is important, and the clinician must remember that the clinical crown of the tooth becomes much more brittle after pulp therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Waggoner WF. Restorative dentistry for the primary dentition. In: Casamassimo PS, Fields H, McTigue D, Nowak A, editors. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co/Elsevier Inc; 2013. p. 304–32.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:511–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Croll TP, Helpin M. Preformed resin-veneered stainless steel crowns for restoration of primary incisors. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:309–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Waggoner WF. Anterior crowns for primary anterior teeth: an evidence based assessment of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:53–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts C, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical evaluation of and parental satisfaction with resin-faced stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23:28–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah PV, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:391–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Champagne C, Waggoner WF, Ditmyer M, Casamassimo PS, MacLean J. Parental satisfaction with preveneered stainless steel crowns for primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2007;29:465–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. MacLean JK, Champagne CE, Waggoner WF, Ditmyer MM, Casamassimo P. Clinical outcomes for primary teeth treated with preveneered stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2007;29:377–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee JK. Restoration of primary anterior teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:506–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Webber DL, Epstein NB, Wong JW, Tsamtsouris A. A method of restoring primary anterior teeth within the aid of a celluloid crown form and composite resins. Pediatr Dent. 1979;1:244–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. The clinical and radiographic success of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:77–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent. 2005;7:221–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ram D, Fuks AB. Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16:49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Sullivan EA, Curzon ME. The efficacy of comprehensive dental care for children under general anesthesia. Br Dent J. 1991;171:56–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Su HL, Chen PS. A clinical evaluation of comprehensive dental treatment for children under general anesthesia. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1992;15:188–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Eidelman E, Faibis S, Peretz B. A comparison of restorations for children with early childhood caries treated under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:33–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tate AR, Ng MW, Needleman HL, Acs G. Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:69–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Al-Eheideb AA, Herman NG. Outcomes of dental procedures performed on children under general anesthesia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;27:181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Karaca S, Ozbay G, Kargul B. Primary zirconia crown restorations for children with early childhood caries. Acta Stomatol Croatica. 2013;47:64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Planells del Pozo P, Fuks AB. Zirconia crowns – an esthetic and resistant restorative alternative for ECC affected primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;38:193–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:163–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:501–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Randall RC. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:489–500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:147–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts JF, Attari N, Sherriff M. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars placed in a specialist pediatric dental practice. Br Dent J. 2005;198:427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Randall RC, Vrijhoef MMA, Wilson NHF. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs amalgam restorations in primary molar teeth: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:337–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Messer LB, Levering NJ. The durability of primary molar restorations: II. Observations and predictions of success of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:81–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levering NJ, Messer LB. The durability of primary molar restorations: I. Observations and predictions of success of amalgams. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:74–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Levering NJ, Messer LB. The durability of primary molar restorations: III. Costs associated with placement and replacement. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:86–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mata AF, Bebermeyer RD. Stainless steel crowns versus amalgams in the primary dentition and decision- making in clinical practice. Gen Dent. 2006;54:347–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restoration s in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005;18:198–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Holan G, Fuks AB, Keltz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:212–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:278–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:29–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guelmann M, Fair J, Bimstein E. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:478–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Stainless steel crowns improve success rate of root canal treatment in primary teeth. J Dent. 2005;33:41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Leith R, O’Connell AC. A clinical study evaluating success of two commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:300–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Connell AC, Kratunova E, Leith R. Posterior preveneered stainless steel crowns: clinical performance after three years. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:254–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ram D, Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Long-term clinical performance of esthetic primary molar crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:582–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a two- year randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:325–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zulfikaroglu BT, Atac AS, Cehreli ZC. Clinical performance of class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 1 2-month results. J Dent Child. 2008;75:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cehreli ZC, Centinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results. Am J Dent. 2006;19:262–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Guelmann M, Shapira J, Silva DR, Fuks AB. Esthetic restorative options for pulpotomized primary molars: a review of literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36:123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Caceda JH. The use of resin-based composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child. 2007;74:147–50.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Guelmann M, Mcllwain MF, Primosch RE. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:24–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34:460–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Drummond BK, Davidson LE, Williams SM, Moffat SM, Ayers KM. Outcomes two, three and four years after comprehensive care under general anesthesia. N Z Dent J. 2004;100:32–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sheller B, Williams BJ, Hays K, Mancl L. Reasons for repeat dental treatment under general anesthesia for the healthy child. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:546–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin J. Donly DDS, MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donly, K.J., Liu, J.A. (2016). Restoration of Pulp-Treated Teeth. In: Fuks, A., Peretz, B. (eds) Pediatric Endodontics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27553-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27553-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27551-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27553-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics