Abstract
The restoration of pulpally treated teeth is critical for the longitudinal success of maintaining the teeth within the oral cavity. There are a number of factors when choosing a restoration following pulp therapy such as the position of the tooth within the dental arch, which dictates the masticatory forces expected, as well as esthetics desired upon final restoration. The amount of tooth structure remaining after caries removal is important, and the clinician must remember that the clinical crown of the tooth becomes much more brittle after pulp therapy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Waggoner WF. Restorative dentistry for the primary dentition. In: Casamassimo PS, Fields H, McTigue D, Nowak A, editors. Pediatric dentistry: infancy through adolescence. 5th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co/Elsevier Inc; 2013. p. 304–32.
Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:511–6.
Croll TP, Helpin M. Preformed resin-veneered stainless steel crowns for restoration of primary incisors. Quintessence Int. 1996;27:309–13.
Waggoner WF. Anterior crowns for primary anterior teeth: an evidence based assessment of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:53–7.
Roberts C, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical evaluation of and parental satisfaction with resin-faced stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2001;23:28–31.
Shah PV, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2004;26:391–5.
Champagne C, Waggoner WF, Ditmyer M, Casamassimo PS, MacLean J. Parental satisfaction with preveneered stainless steel crowns for primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2007;29:465–9.
MacLean JK, Champagne CE, Waggoner WF, Ditmyer MM, Casamassimo P. Clinical outcomes for primary teeth treated with preveneered stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2007;29:377–81.
Lee JK. Restoration of primary anterior teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:506–10.
Webber DL, Epstein NB, Wong JW, Tsamtsouris A. A method of restoring primary anterior teeth within the aid of a celluloid crown form and composite resins. Pediatr Dent. 1979;1:244–6.
Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. The clinical and radiographic success of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:77–8.
Kupietzky A, Waggoner WF, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent. 2005;7:221–5.
Ram D, Fuks AB. Clinical performance of resin-bonded composite strip crowns in primary incisors: a retrospective study. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2006;16:49–54.
O’Sullivan EA, Curzon ME. The efficacy of comprehensive dental care for children under general anesthesia. Br Dent J. 1991;171:56–8.
Su HL, Chen PS. A clinical evaluation of comprehensive dental treatment for children under general anesthesia. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1992;15:188–92.
Eidelman E, Faibis S, Peretz B. A comparison of restorations for children with early childhood caries treated under general anesthesia or conscious sedation. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:33–7.
Tate AR, Ng MW, Needleman HL, Acs G. Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:69–71.
Al-Eheideb AA, Herman NG. Outcomes of dental procedures performed on children under general anesthesia. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;27:181–4.
Karaca S, Ozbay G, Kargul B. Primary zirconia crown restorations for children with early childhood caries. Acta Stomatol Croatica. 2013;47:64–71.
Planells del Pozo P, Fuks AB. Zirconia crowns – an esthetic and resistant restorative alternative for ECC affected primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2014;38:193–5.
Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth: updated for 2014. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:163–70.
Seale NS. The use of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:501–5.
Randall RC. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:489–500.
Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:147–62.
Roberts JF, Attari N, Sherriff M. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars placed in a specialist pediatric dental practice. Br Dent J. 2005;198:427–31.
Randall RC, Vrijhoef MMA, Wilson NHF. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs amalgam restorations in primary molar teeth: a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;131:337–43.
Messer LB, Levering NJ. The durability of primary molar restorations: II. Observations and predictions of success of stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:81–5.
Levering NJ, Messer LB. The durability of primary molar restorations: I. Observations and predictions of success of amalgams. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:74–80.
Levering NJ, Messer LB. The durability of primary molar restorations: III. Costs associated with placement and replacement. Pediatr Dent. 1988;10:86–93.
Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:58–63.
Mata AF, Bebermeyer RD. Stainless steel crowns versus amalgams in the primary dentition and decision- making in clinical practice. Gen Dent. 2006;54:347–50.
Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E, Buerkle V, Garcia-Godoy F, Manhart J. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restoration s in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent. 2005;18:198–211.
Holan G, Fuks AB, Keltz N. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:212–6.
Farooq NS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:278–86.
Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:29–36.
Guelmann M, Fair J, Bimstein E. Permanent versus temporary restorations after emergency pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:478–81.
Moskovitz M, Sammara E, Holan G. Stainless steel crowns improve success rate of root canal treatment in primary teeth. J Dent. 2005;33:41–7.
Leith R, O’Connell AC. A clinical study evaluating success of two commercially available preveneered primary molar stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:300–6.
O’Connell AC, Kratunova E, Leith R. Posterior preveneered stainless steel crowns: clinical performance after three years. Pediatr Dent. 2014;36:254–8.
Ram D, Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Long-term clinical performance of esthetic primary molar crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:582–4.
Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a two- year randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:325–32.
Zulfikaroglu BT, Atac AS, Cehreli ZC. Clinical performance of class II adhesive restorations in pulpectomized primary molars: 1 2-month results. J Dent Child. 2008;75:33–43.
Cehreli ZC, Centinguc A, Cengiz SB, Altay AN. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results. Am J Dent. 2006;19:262–6.
Guelmann M, Shapira J, Silva DR, Fuks AB. Esthetic restorative options for pulpotomized primary molars: a review of literature. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;36:123–6.
Caceda JH. The use of resin-based composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars. J Dent Child. 2007;74:147–50.
Guelmann M, Mcllwain MF, Primosch RE. Radiographic assessment of primary molar pulpotomies restored with resin-based materials. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:24–7.
Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34:460–7.
Drummond BK, Davidson LE, Williams SM, Moffat SM, Ayers KM. Outcomes two, three and four years after comprehensive care under general anesthesia. N Z Dent J. 2004;100:32–7.
Sheller B, Williams BJ, Hays K, Mancl L. Reasons for repeat dental treatment under general anesthesia for the healthy child. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:546–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Donly, K.J., Liu, J.A. (2016). Restoration of Pulp-Treated Teeth. In: Fuks, A., Peretz, B. (eds) Pediatric Endodontics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27553-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27553-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27551-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27553-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)