Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The European Public Sphere and the Internet

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Electronic Democracy in Europe

Abstract

The idea of the “European public sphere” is part of the ongoing discussion about European integration and the further development of the European system of democratic governance. The question of whether there can be an overarching European public sphere alongside the existing national public spheres in European member states is the subject of lively scientific and political debate. In several publications on European Governance, the European Commission has clearly stated that it regards the “inadequate development” of a European public sphere and the public’s disenchantment with EU politics as deficiencies of European democracy. This chapter summarises the debate concerning the need for a transnational European public sphere and how to develop this as an integral, intermediate, democratic structure between European policy-making institutions and the European constituency. Conceptual arguments are discussed concerning the role of the public sphere and related concepts—citizenship and civil society—in transnational democratic governance, and empirical evidence is provided for the Europeanization of the political public sphere. This is set against a consideration of political communication on the Internet and the Internet’s potential to support the emergence of transnational forms of citizenship and transnational political publics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Similar criticism has been put forward with regard to the EC’s ambitious propagation of dialogue and involvement of citizens in the field of science and technology policy. Compared to its practical political fallout in the Commission’s practice of policy-making, this has been dismissed as “rhetorics of participation” (Levidow and Marris 2001).

  2. 2.

    France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom.

  3. 3.

    http://ec.europa.eu/debate-future-europe/index_en.htm [accessed September 7, 2015].

  4. 4.

    http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ [accessed September 7, 2015].

References

  • Albrecht, S. (2010). Reflexionsspiele. Deliberative Demokratie und die Wirklichkeit politischer Diskurse im Internet. Bielefeld, Germany: Transkript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. A. (2006). Inclusive governance—Civil society and the open method of co-ordination. In S. Smismans (Ed.), Civil society and legitimate European governance (pp. 42–67). Cheltenham, England: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bärenreuter, C., Brüll, C., Mokre, M., & Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2009). An overview of research on the European public sphere. Eurosphere Working Paper Series. Online Working Paper No. 03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, L. (2003). Communicating global activism—Strengths and vulnerabilities of networked politics. Information, Communication and Society, 6(2), 143–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2004). Expanding dialogue: The Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy. Sociological Review, 52, 131–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, J. (2007). Democracy across borders: From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, M. (2005). How the EU constructs the European public sphere: Seven strategies on information policy. TranState Working Papers No. 19, University of Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, M., Sifft, S., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Peters, B., & Wimmel, A. (2006). Segmented Europeanisation—The transnationalisation of public spheres in Europe: Trends and patterns. TransState Working Papers No. 37, University of Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts, B., & Van Audenhove, L. (2005). Online political debate, unbounded citizenship, and the problematic nature of a transnational public sphere. Political Communication, 22(2), 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy—Reflections on the Internet, business and society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Sabel, C. (1997). Directly deliberative polyarchy. European Law Journal, 3(4), 313–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Union. (2001). European governance. A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Union. (2005). The Commission’s contribution to the period of reflection and beyond: Plan-D for democracy, dialogue and debate. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2005) 494 final. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Union. (2006, February 1). White paper on a European communication policy. COM (2006) 35 final version, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, L. (2007). The Internet, deliberative democracy, and power: Radicalizing the public sphere. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 3(1), 47–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. (2003). Integration through culture? The paradox of the search for a European identity. In K. Eder & B. Giesen (Eds.), European citizenship—National legacies and transnational projects (pp. 221–244). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. (2007). The public sphere and European democracy: Mechanisms of democratisation in the transnational situation. In J. E. Fossum & P. Schlesinger (Eds.), The European Union and the public sphere—A communicative space in the making? (pp. 44–64). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K., & Giesen, B. (Eds.). (2003). European citizenship—National legacies and transnational projects. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilders, C., & Voltmer, K. (2003). Zwischen Deutschland und Europa. Eine empirische Untersuchung zum Grad von Europäisierung und Europa-Unterstützung der meinungsführenden deutschen Tageszeitungen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51(2), 250–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, E. O. (2007). Conceptualising European public spheres: General, segmented and strong publics. In J. E. Fossum & P. Schlesinger (Eds.), The European Union and the public sphere—A communicative space in the making? (pp. 23–43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurosphere. (2013). Linking the European Union with the citizens. Evaluation of EU policies aiming to create a democratic European Public Sphere. In Eurosphere—Final comparative study (Vol. 1). Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fossum, J. E., & Schlesinger, P. (2007). Introduction. In J. E. Fossum & P. Schlesinger (Eds.), The European Union and the public sphere—A communicative space in the making? (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, N. (2007). Transnationalising the public sphere—On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture and Society, 24(4), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, D. (2013). European governance and the deliberative challenge. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us? Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 35–56). Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhards, J. (2000). Europäisierung von Ökonomie und Politik und die Trägheit der Entstehung einer europäischen Öffentlichkeit. In M. Bach (Ed.), Die Europäisierung nationaler Gesellschaften. Sonderheft 40 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (pp. 277–305). Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesen, B., & Eder, K. (2003). European citizenship. An avenue for the social integration of Europe. In K. Eder & B. Giesen (Eds.), European citizenship—National legacies and transnational projects (pp. 1–13). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles Bailón, S. (2011, May 26). Title missing. STOA Workshop at the European Parliament, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, D. (2004). Treaty or constitution? The legal basis of the European Union after Maastricht. In E. O. Eriksen, J. E. Fossum, & A. J. Menéndez (Eds.), Developing a constitution for Europe (pp. 69–87). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, A., Banse, G., Coenen, C., & Hennen, L. (2006). Netzöffentlichkeit und digitale Demokratie. Tendenzen politischer Kommunikation im Internet. Studien des Büros für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim deutschen Bundestag, Bd. 18, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Further reflections on the public sphere. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2001). So, why does Europe need a constitution? Florence, Italy: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantner, C. (2006). Collective identity as shared ethical self-understanding: The case of the emerging European identity. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(4), 501–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and independence in the information age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kies, R., Leyenaar, M., & Niemöller, K. (2013). European citizens consultation: A large consultation on a vague topic. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us? Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 59–78). Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kies, R., & Nanz, P. (Eds.). (2013a). Is Europe listening to us? Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations. Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kies, R., & Nanz, P. (2013b). Introduction. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us? Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 1–14). Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R. (2007). Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanised political debates. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (2010). The making of a European public sphere: Political communication and collective action in an area of European governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Latzer, M., & Sauerwein, F. (2006). Europäisierung durch Medien: Ansätze und Erkenntnisse der Medienforschung. In W. R. Langenbucher & M. Latzer (Eds.), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel. Eine transdisziplinäre Perspektive (pp. 10–45). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, L., & Marris, C. (2001). Science and governance in Europe: Lessons from the case of agricultural biotechnology. Science and Public Policy, 28(5), 345–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebert, U., & Trenz, H. J. (2011). The ‘new politics of European civil society’: Conceptual, normative and empirical issues. In U. Liebert & H. J. Trenz (Eds.), The new politics of European civil society (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, R. (2007). Politischer Wandel durch digitale Netzwerkkommunikation? Strategische Anwendung neuer Kommunikationstechnologien durch kanadische Parteien und Interessengruppen. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette, P. (2006). Democracy in the European Union: Why and how to combine representation and participation? In S. Smismans (Ed.), Civil society and legitimate European governance (pp. 23–41). Cheltenham, England: Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. D. (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C. O. (1999). Political legitimacy and the invisibility of politics: Exploring the European Union’s communication deficit. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 617–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neidhardt, F. (2006). Europäische Öffentlichkeit als Prozess. Anmerkungen zum Forschungsstand. In W. R. Langenbucher & M. Latzer (Eds.), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel. Eine transdiziplinäre Perspektive (pp. 46–62). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfetsch, B. (2004). The voice of the media in European public sphere: Comparative analysis of newspaper editorials. Integrated Report WP 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, T. (2008). The Internet and differentiation in the public sphere. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, T. (2013). Internet-based media, Europe and the political public sphere. Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2003). An emerging European public sphere? Theoretical clarifications and empirical indicators. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the European Studies Association (EUSA), Nashville TN, March 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, P. (2007). A fragile cosmopolitanism: On the unresolved ambiguities of the European public sphere. In J. Fossum & P. Schlesinger (Eds.), The European Union and the public sphere: A communicative space in the making? (pp. 65–84). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, P. C. (2003). The scope of citizenship in a democratised European Union. In K. Eder & B. Giesen (Eds.), European citizenship—National legacies and transnational projects (pp. 86–121). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. (1997). Citizenship of the Union: Towards a post-national membership? Jean Monet Working Papers. Harvard Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C. (2004). Whither European citizenship? Eros and civilisation revisited. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicakkan, H. (2013). Diversity and the European public sphere—Towards a citizens’ Europe (Eurosphere—Final comparative study, Vol. 3). Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smismans, S. (2006a). Civil society and European governance: From concepts to research agenda. In S. Smismans (Ed.), Civil society and legitimate European governance (pp. 3–22). Cheltenham, England: Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smismans, S. (2006b). Civil society and legitimate European governance. Cheltenham, England: Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. (2013). Designing democratic innovations at the European level: Lessons from the experiments. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us? Successes and failure of EU citizen consultations (pp. 201–216). Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H. J. (2004). Media coverage on European governance—Exploring the European public sphere in national quality papers. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), 291–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H. J. (2008). In search of the European public sphere. Between normative overstretch and empirical disenchantment. RECON Online Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenz, H. J., & Eder, K. (2004). The democratizing dynamics of a European public sphere—Towards a theory of democratic functionalism. European Journal of Social Theory, 7(1), 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden, H.-A. (2010). Social movements, public spheres and the European politics of the environment: Green power Europe? Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wessler, H., Peters, B., Brüggemann, M., Kleinen von Königslöw, K., & Sifft, S. (2008). Transnationalisation of public spheres. New York: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, R., Kozeluh, U., & Brandstetter, G. (2006). Deliberation im europäischen Kontext: Online Debatten und Online Konsultationen auf der EU Platform “Your Voice in Europe”. In W. R. Langenbucher & M. Latzer (Eds.), Europäische Öffentlichkeit und medialer Wandel. Eine transdisziplinäre Perspektive (pp. 378–400). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. (2010). Widerstand im Netz. Zur Herausbildung einer transnationalen Öffentlichkeit durch netzbasierte Kommunikation. Bielefeld, Germany: Transkript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M. (2013). Europe’s new communication policy and the introduction of transnational deliberative citizen’s involvement projects. In R. Kies & P. Nanz (Eds.), Is Europe listening to us? Successes and failures of EU citizen consultations (pp. 17–24). Farnham, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., & Favell, A. (2010). Governmentality, political field or public sphere? Theoretical alternatives in the political sociology of the EU. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(4), 489–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, A., Koopmanns, R., & Schlecht, T. (2004). Political communication on the Internet. Link structure among political actors in Europe. Berlin, Germany: WZB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Technology Assessment and Systems Analysis (ITAS), c/o Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Ahrstraße 45, Bonn, 53175, Germany

    Leonhard Hennen

Authors
  1. Leonhard Hennen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonhard Hennen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Innovation Research (ISI), Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Ralf Lindner

  2. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Technology Assessment (ITA), Vienna, Austria

    Georg Aichholzer

  3. ITAS, c/o Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, Karlsruher Institute of Technology (KIT), Bonn, Germany

    Leonhard Hennen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hennen, L. (2016). The European Public Sphere and the Internet. In: Lindner, R., Aichholzer, G., Hennen, L. (eds) Electronic Democracy in Europe. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27419-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation