Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Space Regulations Library ((SPRL,volume 8))

Abstract

The discovery of intelligent extraterrestrial life will thrust Mankind into a new relationship, and the manner in which Mankind interacts in the engagement of that relationship will be governed by the rules of Metalaw. Whether to engage in communication, and if so, the content of the communication, have direct metalegal consequences. The SETI Committee of the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA) has formulated Protocols regarding activities following the detection of ETI, and the sending of communications to ETI. These Protocols, which have received widespread acceptance within international organizations and the SETI community, implicitly reflect metalegal principles. However, these documents were formulated more than 20 years ago, and although some revisions occurred in 2010, they predate and thus do not consider social media and its implications. Social media represents a revolution in communications, and this article examines the significant implications of social media for the Protocols and application of the metalegal principles expressed therein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://avsport.org/IAA/protdet.htm; see Annex I.

  2. 2.

    http://avsport.org/IAA/reply.htm; see Annex II.

  3. 3.

    http://avsport.org/IAA/protocols_rev2010.pdf; see Annex III.

  4. 4.

    See also Iván Almár and Jill Tarter , The Discovery of ETI as a High-Consequence, Low-Probability Event. 2011. Acta Astronautica 68: 358–361 (discussing the Rio Scale for determining the credibility of a suspected alien communication).

  5. 5.

    Nature 184, Number 4690: 844-846, September 19, 1959, text reprinted http://www.coseti.org/morris_0.htm.

  6. 6.

    This hydrogen line is the “water hole,” that is, the frequency at which radiation from the precession of interstellar hydrogen is detected. Many SETI researchers believe that an ETI would have detected the hydrogen line , and therefore searches are tuned to that frequency.

  7. 7.

    See http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=77751.

  8. 8.

    See SETI@home website, http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_about.php.

  9. 9.

    According to the Free DC Distributed Computer Stat System, more than 3.5 million computers were part of the SETI@home network as of July, 2015. See http://stats.free-dc.org/stats.php?page=index http://stats.free-dc.org/stats.php?page=index.

  10. 10.

    Baron Charles de Secondat Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Law (1769), German ed., Munich, 1967, pp. 57–58, cited by Ernst Fasan . 1970. Relations with Alien Intelligences The Scientific Basis of Metalaw, 13–4. Berlin: Berlin Verlag, text reprinted in Oeuvres de Monsieur de Montesquieu V4: de L’Espirit Des Lois (1769). 2009. English / French edition. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing.

  11. 11.

    Space Law and Metalaw, presented to the International Astronautical Congress Rome, Italy, September 19, 1956; see also Andrew G. Haley. 1963. Space Law and Government, Chapter 12. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.

  12. 12.

    See Fasan, supra note 10, p. 11.

  13. 13.

    Immanuel Kant , Werke, Reclam Edition (Stuttgart, 1963).

  14. 14.

    Fasan, supra note 10, p. 56.

  15. 15.

    Id. pp. 71–2.

  16. 16.

    See Adam Korbitz. 2010. Metalaw and the Need for Further Elaboration 2–3. IAF Paper No. IAC-10-A4.2.10.

  17. 17.

    See Patricia M. Sterns. 2000. SETI and Space Law: Jurisprudential and Philosophical Considerations for Humankind in Relation to Extraterrestrial Life. Acta Astronautica 46: 759–763.

  18. 18.

    Lyall, Francis and Paul B. Larsen. 2009. Space Law A Treatise 558, note 107. Surrey: Ashgate.

  19. 19.

    Of course, this same rationalization has been used to justify ethnic, racial and religious prejudices, and had led to some of mankind’s darkest hours.

  20. 20.

    C. Oliver. 2010. Social Networking Implications for Post Detection Communications 3. IAC Paper No. IAC-10-A4.2.5, presented to the 61st International Astronautical Congress, Prague, Czech Republic, 2010.

  21. 21.

    Id. p. 4.

  22. 22.

    The SETI Post-Detection Protocols were developed by the SETI Committee of the IAA, and approved by the Board of Trustees of the Academy as well as the Board of Directors of the International Institute of Space Law (IISL). The document has been endorsed by the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR), the International Astronomical Union, Commission J of the Union Radio Scientifique Internationale, and by the International Astronautical Federation (IAF). The Declaration of Principles, however, has not yet been formally approved by the IAA nor submitted for approval to other organizations and entities. As such, its status is unsettled. Nevertheless, as it generally restates the elements of the Post-Detection Protocols, the discussion in the text referencing the Post-Detection Protocols also shall apply to the Declaration unless stated otherwise.

  23. 23.

    Paragraph 2 of the Post-Detection Protocols refers to all observers and research organizations party to the document. Paragraph 2 of the Declaration of Principles states that the collaborations shall be with other investigators whether or not they are signatories.

  24. 24.

    Ambiguity of origin can be exemplified on Earth by the Bimini Road on the Atlantic Ocean floor. While most scientists support the view that a natural process was responsible for the regularly shaped block formation, there are other opinions favoring the theory of human fabrication of the mysterious structure.

  25. 25.

    Post Detection Protocol ¶ 5; Declaration of Principles ¶ 4.

  26. 26.

    If the alien communication were made by electromagnetic signal, responses by amateurs, if not also professionals, will flood the frequency. Paragraph 7 of the Post-Detection Protocols provides a procedure by which the frequency can be protected. A mechanism should be put in place in advance to lay the preliminary groundwork so that the applications to the International Telecommunications Union to protect the frequency can be made as soon as possible upon detection of a confirmed signal. The signatories to the Protocols should pledge not to use the frequency and to support a future application to the ITU for protection of the frequency.

  27. 27.

    Post Detection Protocol ¶ 9. The Declaration of Principles revised this provision and designated the Post-Detection Task Group under the auspices of the IAA SETI Permanent Study Group for this purpose, however the IAA has been restructured and the status of the Post-Detection Task Group is uncertain.

  28. 28.

    Paragraph 7 of the Reply Protocols provides that consideration should be given to long term institutional arrangements for communications, in other words a dialogue, which is subject to metalaw. These communications do not refer to Messages to ETI (METI or active SETI ) which could initiate communications with an alien civilization, but rather to a response to a confirmed signal.

  29. 29.

    Lyall and Larsen, supra note 18, p. 554, note 92, citing § 9 UK Space Act, which requires a license for space activities.

  30. 30.

    A comparison of the most popular social media sites from 2010 and 2015 reveals that half of the sites in the top 10 in 2010 were no longer on the list only five years later. Compare Top 10 Social Media Websites in September 2010, http://www.fortune3.com/blog/2010/11/top-10-social-media-websites-in-september-2010/, with Top 15 Most Popular Social Networking Sites | July 2015, http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites.

  31. 31.

    Allen Tough. 2002. The Internet as a Gateway to ETI, in Contact in Context 1, Issue 1; see also Invitation to ETI website, http://www.ieti.org/index.html. Although this is an intriguing proposition, an ETI would not need an invitation to send a communication to the Earth, and it may be questioned why such an ET that was monitoring our communications had not already made contact. That is, the ET monitoring our communications but refraining from contact could be exercising such forbearance as a matter of choice.

  32. 32.

    Many of these messages are listed in Stephane Dumas . 2014. Message to an Intelligent Civilisation: A Historical Perspective. IAF Paper No. IAC-14.E4.3.5.

  33. 33.

    See Sagan, Carl, F.D. Drake, Ann Druyan, Timothy Ferris, Jon Lomberg, and Linda Salzman Sagan. 1978. Murmurs of Earth: The Voyager Interstellar Record. New York: Random House.

  34. 34.

    Steve Trimberger. 2014. Addressing Societal Concerns in Active SETI . IAF Paper No. IAC-14-A4.1.9.

  35. 35.

    Id.

  36. 36.

    Thus, it is theoretically possible for alien civilizations within a distance of 50 light years from Earth to have intercepted a transmission and sent its own message which would have reached Earth by now. Moreover, alien civilizations anywhere in the known universe could have been transmitting wireless communications that could have reached Earth even if the origin was millions of light years away. If the planets are ubiquitous in the galaxy, and the probability that alien intelligence does in fact exist is as high as believed, and then why have we not received or intercepted any messages? See generally Paul Davies. 2010. The Eerie Silence. Boston, New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

  37. 37.

    Douglas A. Vakoch, Timothy A. Lower, Britton A. Niles, and K. Rast. 2010. What Should We Say to Extraterrestrial Intelligence?: An Analysis of Responses to “Earth Speaks” 7. IAF Paper No. IAC-10-A.4.2.6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Margaret Sterns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Annex I

Declaration of Principles Concerning Activities Following the Detection of Extraterrestrial Intelligence

We, the institutions and individuals participating in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence,

Recognizing that the search for extraterrestrial intelligence is an integral part of space exploration and is being undertaken for peaceful purposes and for the common interest of all mankind,

Inspired by the profound significance for mankind of detecting evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, even though the probability of detection may be low,

Recalling the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, which commits States Parties to that Treaty “to inform the Secretary General of the United Nations as well as the public and the international scientific community, to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, of the nature, conduct, locations and results” of their space exploration activities (Article XI),

Recognizing that any initial detection may be incomplete or ambiguous and thus require careful examination as well as confirmation, and that it is essential to maintain the highest standards of scientific responsibility and credibility,

Agree to observe the following principles for disseminating information about the detection of extraterrestrial intelligence:

  1. 1.

    Any individual, public or private research institution, or governmental agency that believes it has detected a signal from or other evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence (the discoverer) should seek to verify that the most plausible explanation for the evidence is the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence rather than some other natural phenomenon or anthropogenic phenomenon before making any public announcement. If the evidence cannot be confirmed as indicating the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, the discoverer may disseminate the information as appropriate to the discovery of any unknown phenomenon.

  2. 2.

    Prior to making a public announcement that evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence has been detected, the discoverer should promptly inform all other observers or research organizations that are parties to this declaration, so that those other parties may seek to confirm the discovery by independent observations at other sites and so that a network can be established to enable continuous monitoring of the signal or phenomenon. Parties to this declaration should not make any public announcement of this information until it is determined whether this information is or is not credible evidence of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence. The discoverer should inform his/her or its relevant national authorities.

  3. 3.

    After concluding that the discovery appears to be credible evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, and after informing other parties to this declaration, the discoverer should inform observers throughout the world through the Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams of the International Astronomical Union, and should inform the Secretary General of the United Nations in accordance with Article XI of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Bodies. Because of their demonstrated interest in and expertise concerning the question of the existence of extraterrestrial intelligence, the discoverer should simultaneously inform the following international institutions of the discovery and should provide them with all pertinent data and recorded information concerning the evidence: the International Telecommunication Union, the Committee on Space Research, of the International Council of Scientific Unions, the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, the International Institute of Space Law , Commission 51 of the International Astronomical Union and Commission J of the International Radio Science Union.

  4. 4.

    A confirmed detection of extraterrestrial intelligence should be disseminated promptly, openly, and widely through scientific channels and public media, observing the procedures in this declaration. The discoverer should have the privilege of making the first public announcement.

  5. 5.

    All data necessary for confirmation of detection should be made available to the international scientific community through publications, meetings, conferences, and other appropriate means.

  6. 6.

    The discovery should be confirmed and monitored and any data bearing on the evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be recorded and stored permanently to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, in a form that will make it available for further analysis and interpretation. These recordings should be made available to the international institutions listed above and to members of the scientific community for further objective analysis and interpretation.

  7. 7.

    If the evidence of detection is in the form of electromagnetic signals, the parties to this declaration should seek international agreement to protect the appropriate frequencies by exercising procedures available through the International Telecommunication Union. Immediate notice should be sent to the Secretary General of the ITU in Geneva, who may include a request to minimize transmissions on the relevant frequencies in the Weekly Circular. The Secretariat, in conjunction with advice of the Union’s Administrative Council, should explore the feasibility and utility of convening an Extraordinary Administrative Radio Conference to deal with the matter, subject to the opinions of the member Administrations of the ITU.

  8. 8.

    No response to a signal or other evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be sent until appropriate international consultations have taken place. The procedures for such consultations will be the subject of a separate agreement, declaration or arrangement.

  9. 9.

    The SETI Committee of the International Academy of Astronautics, in coordination with Commission 51 of the International Astronomical Union, will conduct a continuing review of procedures for the detection of extraterrestrial intelligence and the subsequent handling of the data. Should credible evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence be discovered, an international committee of scientists and other experts should be established to serve as a focal point for continuing analysis of all observational evidence collected in the aftermath of the discovery, and also to provide advice on the release of information to the public. This committee should be constituted from representatives of each of the international institutions listed above and such other members as the committee may deem necessary. To facilitate the convocation of such a committee at some unknown time in the future, the SETI Committee of the International Academy of Astronautics should initiate and maintain a current list of willing representatives from each of the international institutions listed above, as well as other individuals with relevant skills, and should make that list continuously available through the Secretariat of the International Academy of Astronautics. The International Academy of Astronautics will act as the Depository for this declaration and will annually provide a current list of parties to all the parties to this declaration.

Adopted by the International Academy of Astronautics, 1989

Annex II

Draft Declaration of Principles Concerning Sending Communications with Extraterrestrial Intelligence

  1. 1.

    International consultations should be initiated to consider the question of sending communications to extraterrestrial civilizations.

  2. 2.

    Consultations on whether a message should be sent, and its content, should take place within the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space of the United Nations and within other governmental and non-governmental organizations, and should accommodate participation by qualified, interested groups that can contribute constructively to these consultations.

  3. 3.

    These consultations should be open to participation by all interested States and should be intended to lead to recommendations reflecting a consensus.

  4. 4.

    The United Nations General Assembly should consider making the decision on whether or not to send a message to extraterrestrial intelligence, and on what the content of that message should be, based on recommendations from the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and from governmental and non-governmental organizations.

  5. 5.

    If a decision is made to send a message to extraterrestrial intelligence, it should be sent on behalf of all Humankind, rather than from individual States.

  6. 6.

    The content of such a message should reflect a careful concern for the broad interests and wellbeing of Humanity, and should be made available to the public in advance of transmission.

  7. 7.

    As the sending of a communication to extraterrestrial intelligence could lead to an exchange of communications separated by many years, consideration should be given to a long-term institutional framework for such communications.

  8. 8.

    No communication to extraterrestrial intelligence should be sent by any State until appropriate international consultations have taken place. States should not cooperate with attempts to communicate with extraterrestrial intelligence that do not conform to the principles of this Declaration.

  9. 9.

    In their deliberations on these questions, States participating in this Declaration and United Nations bodies should draw on the expertise of scientists, scholars, and other persons with relevant knowledge.

Proposed by the SETI Committee of the International Academy of Astronautics, 1995

Annex III

Declaration of Principles Concerning the Conduct of the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence

Preamble

The parties to this declaration are individuals and institutions participating in the scientific Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI).

The purpose of this document is to declare our commitment to conduct this search in a scientifically valid and transparent manner and to establish uniform procedures for the announcement of a confirmed SETI detection.

This commitment is made in recognition of the profound scientific, social, ethical, legal, philosophical and other implications of a SETI detection. As this enterprise enjoys wide public interest, but engenders uncertainty about how information collected during the search will be handled, the signatories have voluntarily constructed this declaration. It, together with a current list of signatory parties, will be placed on file with the International Academy of Astronautics (IAA).

Principles

  1. 1.

    Searching: SETI experiments will be conducted transparently, and its practitioners will be free to present reports on activities and results in public and professional fora. They will also be responsive to news organizations and other public communications media about their work.

  2. 2.

    Handling candidate evidence: In the event of a suspected detection of extraterrestrial intelligence, the discoverer will make all efforts to verify the detection, using the resources available to the discoverer and with the collaboration of other investigators, whether or not signatories to this Declaration. Such efforts will include, but not be limited to, observations at more than one facility and/or by more than one organization. There is no obligation to disclose verification efforts while they are underway, and there should be no premature disclosures pending verification. Inquiries from the media and news organizations should be responded to promptly and honestly. Information about candidate signals or other detections should be treated in the same way that any scientist would treat provisional laboratory results. The Rio Scale, or its equivalent, should be used as a guide to the import and significance of candidate discoveries for the benefit of non-specialist audiences.

  3. 3.

    Confirmed detections: If the verification process confirms – by the consensus of the other investigators involved and to a degree of certainty judged by the discoverers to be credible – that a signal or other evidence is due to extraterrestrial intelligence, the discoverer shall report this conclusion in a full and complete open manner to the public, the scientific community, and the Secretary General of the United Nations. The confirmation report will include the basic data, the process and results of the verification efforts, any conclusions and interpretations, and any detected information content of the signal itself. A formal report will also be made to the International Astronomical Union (IAU).

  4. 4.

    All data necessary for the confirmation of the detection should be made available to the international scientific community through publications, meetings, conferences, and other appropriate means.

  5. 5.

    The discovery should be monitored. Any data bearing on the evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence should be recorded and stored permanently to the greatest extent feasible and practicable, in a form that will make it available to observers and to the scientific community for further analysis and interpretation.

  6. 6.

    If the evidence of detection is in the form of electromagnetic signals, observers should seek international agreement to protect the appropriate frequencies by exercising the extraordinary procedures established within the World Administrative Radio Council of the International Telecommunication Union.

  7. 7.

    Post Detection: A Post-Detection Task Group under the auspices of the IAA SETI Permanent Study Group has been established to assist in matters that may arise in the event of a confirmed signal, and to support the scientific and public analysis by offering guidance, interpretation, and discussion of the wider implications of the detection.

  8. 8.

    Response to signals: In the case of the confirmed detection of a signal, signatories to this declaration will not respond without first seeking guidance and consent of a broadly representative international body, such as the United Nations.

As revised 2010

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sterns, P.M., Tennen, L.I. (2016). SETI, Metalaw, and Social Media. In: Sterns, P., Tennen, L. (eds) Private Law, Public Law, Metalaw and Public Policy in Space. Space Regulations Library, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27087-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27087-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-27085-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-27087-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics