Abstract
While there has been substantial development in the use of industrial robots for the tool pathing and assembly of fabrication components for architecture, there exists a scope for improving a methodology for the mapping of material substrate in architectural construction settings. Construction tolerances posit a problem since they vary widely from rough to finish applications and are often at odds with the demanding precision required in robotic fabrication processes. This paper discusses a series of tests of scanning techniques on three example substrates typical to wood construction, including: lath for plastering and stucco, spaced sheathing for cedar shingles, and traditional stick framing. Scanning substrates accounts for the gaps in tolerance that emerge from rough to finish construction such as variation in as-built dimensions, misalignment of members, and the adaptive behavior of materials as they adjust to new conditions. From a comparison of scanning techniques, a cost benefit matrix is developed to aid in evaluating the appropriate application of scanning techniques for various robotic applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Hal.thibaultschwartz.com.
References
Ballast D, 1994, Handbook of Construction Tolerances, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Feng, C et al., 2014, ‘Towards Autonomous Robotic In-Situ Assembly on Unstructured Construction Sites Using Monocular Vision’, Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC), 31st Symposium, pp.163–170.
Lee, S and Moon, J 2014, ‘Introduction of Human-Robot Cooperation Technology at Construction Sites,’ Automation and Robotics in Construction and Mining (ISARC), 31st Symposium, pp. 978–983.
Schwartz, T, Bard, J, Ganon, M, Jacobson-Weaver, Z, Jeffers, M and Tursky, R 2014, ‘All Bent Out’, in McGee, W and Ponce de Leon M (eds), Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design’, pp. 305–317.
Vähä, P, Heikkila, T, Kilpelainen, P, Jarviluoma, M, Gambao, E, 2013, ‘Extending Automation Of Building Construction—Survey On Potential Sensor Technologies And Robotic Applications’, Automation in Construction, Vol.36, pp.168–178.
Vasey, L, Maxwell, I and Pigram, D 2014, Adaptive Part Variation, Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design, pp. 291–304.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to research assistants Brian Smith, David Blackwood, Nidhi Sekhar. Autodesk’s beta version of Memento was used to for the photogrammetry section of this research. Optitrack Cameras were used for all motion capture. HAL Robot Programming and Control was used to stream MOCAP sessions into Grasshopper.Footnote 1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bard, J., Tursky, R., Jeffers, M. (2016). RECONstruction. In: Reinhardt, D., Saunders, R., Burry, J. (eds) Robotic Fabrication in Architecture, Art and Design 2016. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26378-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26378-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26376-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26378-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)