Skip to main content

The Unbelievable Complexity of the Truly Simple

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
In Search of a Simple Introduction to Communication
  • 271 Accesses

Abstract

In the coming chapters we will try to deepen our understanding of the limitations of the reductionist worldview as the foundation of communication studies. This effort is worthwhile because outlining these limitations will allow us also to ask how, if at all, they might be circumvented. As an important introduction to all of this, we have to add to our discussion a brief but crucial note about the false promise embodied in the reductionist explanation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The best known axiomatic system in history is Euclid’s geometry of course. Non-Euclidean geometries were not known in Descartes’ time. Euclid’s geometry undoubtedly served as Descartes’ model for the construction of scientific knowledge. But it was not the only deductive system known in his time: Aristotle’s system of syllogisms (which preceded that of Euclid), and in particular the one implied by Aristotle’s derivation of all the valid syllogisms from those of the first group was also rather well known, if not yet articulated in a way that underscored its nature as a formal system. Only modern scholars of Aristotle’s theory (and most prominently, Lukasiewicz) could emphasize this aspect of Aristotle’s theory unequivocally. Indeed, even the first fully formal articulation of Euclid’s geometry belongs only to the time of David Hilbert. These facts clarify, I hope, just how far-sighted was Descartes intuition in this case.

Bibliography

  • Bar-Am, N., & Agassi, J. (2014). Meaning: From Parmenides to Wittgenstein: Philosophy as footnotes to Parmenides. Conceptus, 41(99), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1985). The philosophical writings of descartes (vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nimrod Bar-Am .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bar-Am, N. (2016). The Unbelievable Complexity of the Truly Simple. In: In Search of a Simple Introduction to Communication. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25625-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics