Skip to main content

(Re)Playing Decolonization Through Pele, Aloha’Oe and Indigenous Knowledge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Play: A Theory of Learning and Change
  • 1436 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the phenomenology of play and performance through the lens of decolonization. Play demands a conceptual scheme of the self that is commanding, active and transforming. Through decolonization, play becomes an opportunity for remaking the body in, through and for teacher education in Western, Northern and settler society.

To control the conceptual scheme is thus to command one’s world. (D.T. Goldberg [1], p. 9)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In terms of this chapter, play is defined as the participation, enjoyment, and engagement in [social] imagination.

  2. 2.

    Said [2], p. 32.

  3. 3.

    Butler [3], p. 165.

  4. 4.

    English translation meaning chants.

  5. 5.

    Braidotti [4].

  6. 6.

    Deleuze and Guattari [5].

  7. 7.

    Emerson [6], pp. 186–197.

  8. 8.

    To listen to the mele ˆQueen Lili’uokalani – Aloha’Oe, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1bIxMYPlas and to view the translated lyrics at Lili’uokalani. “Aloha’Oe.” HUAPALA Hawaiian Music and Hula Archives. Accessed June 25, 2014. http://www.huapala.org/Aloha/Aloha_Oe.html

  9. 9.

    Braidotti [4], pp. 28/91.

  10. 10.

    English translation meaning family.

  11. 11.

    Emerson [6], p, 136.

  12. 12.

    Emerson [6], p. 136.

  13. 13.

    In connection to “lines of desire” where the I interpret indigenous identity moving from the molar formation and engaging towards another play of different set of rules and imaginations. Refer to Deleuze and Guattari [5].

  14. 14.

    In connection to “primary task for posthuman critical theory therefore is to draw accurate and precise cartographies for these different subject positions as spring-boards toward Posthuman recompositions of a pan-human cosmopolitan bond.” Braidotti [4], pp. 38/40.

  15. 15.

    Refer to Smith’s Everyday World as Problematic, 1991, as the main text troubles the local experience towards generalized and totalising features of social relations.

  16. 16.

    Deleuze and Guattari [7], p. 430.

  17. 17.

    Emerson [6], p. 187.

  18. 18.

    Braidotti [4], Introduction, pp. 20/24.

  19. 19.

    Emerson [6], p. 195.

  20. 20.

    Emerson [6], p. 197.

  21. 21.

    Emerson [6], p. 187.

  22. 22.

    This also has resonance to Deleuze-Guattarian molar machines. The decolonised body becomes a whole body of the indigenous formed by the indigenous, rather than the sum of constructed parts from the colonizer.

  23. 23.

    Perhaps this is a version Deleuze-Guattari’s molar body with an invariant indigenous identity as female.

  24. 24.

    Emerson [6], p. 187.

  25. 25.

    Emerson [6], p. 196.

  26. 26.

    English translation for sacred.

  27. 27.

    Emerson [6], footnotes, p. 197.

  28. 28.

    English translation for code of conduct.

  29. 29.

    Fanon [8], p. 94.

  30. 30.

    Braidotti [4], Chap. 2, pp. 54/74.

  31. 31.

    For actual words to the mele, refer to Lili’uokalani. “Aloha’Oe.” HUAPALA Hawaiian Music and Hula Archives. Accessed June 25, 2014. http://www.huapala.org/Aloha/Aloha_Oe.html.

  32. 32.

    Braidotti [4], pp. 38/40.

  33. 33.

    Braidotti [4], pp. 68/91.

  34. 34.

    Deleuze and Guattari [7], p. 430.

  35. 35.

    Emerson [6], pp. 188–187.

  36. 36.

    Braidotti [4], Critical Posthumanism, pp. 78/91.

  37. 37.

    Emerson [6], p. 197.

  38. 38.

    Sefa Dei [9].

  39. 39.

    Goldberg [1], p. 13.

  40. 40.

    Adapting and intersecting with posthuman qualitative shift and “what exactly is the basic unit of common reference for our species, our polity and our relationship to other inhabitants of this planet” Braidotti [4], Introduction, Para. 2.

References

  1. Goldberg, D. T. (1998). Racist culture: Philosophy and the politics of meaning. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, J. (2007). Bodies that matter. In M. Lock & J. Farquhar (Eds.), Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Emerson, N. E. (1978). Unwritten literature of Hawaii: The sacred songs of the Hula. Honolulu: Mutual Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2007). We always make love with worlds. In M. Lock & J. Farquhar (Eds.), Beyond the body proper: Reading the anthropology of material life. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the Earth (C. Farrington, Trans.). New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sefa Dei, G. J. (1993). Indigenous African knowledge systems: Local traditions of sustainable forestry. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 4(1), 28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umar Keoni Umangay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Umangay, U.K. (2016). (Re)Playing Decolonization Through Pele, Aloha’Oe and Indigenous Knowledge. In: Brabazon, T. (eds) Play: A Theory of Learning and Change. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25549-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics