Skip to main content

Flow-Aware Networking for Net Neutrality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Guide to Flow-Aware Networking

Part of the book series: Computer Communications and Networks ((CCN))

  • 523 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the network neutrality debate which can shape the future Internet. First, the net neutrality issue is shown from the network perspective. Then, various definitions of the network neutrality, the history of the concept, and the spectrum of its violations are reviewed. The net neutrality debate is shown from various perspectives, e.g., from network operators, content providers, and governments. Then the solution to the problem given by FAN is described and the possible future developments are mentioned.

Any provider that blocks access to content is inviting customers to find another provider. And that’s just bad business.

Ed Whitacre

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although network neutrality is usually referred to as net neutrality , for short, both terms convey exactly the same meaning. Throughout this book both terms will be used interchangeably.

References

  1. G. Held, “Net neutrality may be a necessity,” International Journal of Network Management, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Crowcroft, “Net neutrality: the technical side of the debate: a white paper,” ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Guijarro, V. Pla, J. R. Vidal, and J. Bauset, “Search engine and content providers: neutrality, competition and integration,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ett.2827

  4. F. B. Schneider, “Network Neutrality versus Internet Trustworthiness?” IEEE Security and Privacy, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 3–4, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. M. Owen, “The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. AT&T and 120 Years After the Act to Regulate Commerce,” Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Rafique, C. Yuan, and M. Saeed, “Net Neutrality Paradox: Regulator’s Dilemma,” in 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM), 2011, 2011, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Trinh and L. Gyarmati, “How to price internet access for disloyal users under uncertainty,” Annals of Telecommunications - Annales des Telecommunications, vol. 65, no. 3-4, pp. 171–188, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12243-009-0133-y

  8. G. D’Acquisto and M. Naldi, “How much can content providers afford to pay for network charges?” in 2012 Sixth UKSim/AMSS European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation (EMS), 2012, pp. 257–262.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Economides and J. Tag, “Net Neutrality on the Internet: A Two-sided Market Analysis,” NET Institute, Working Papers 07-14, Sep. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://ideas.repec.org/p/net/wpaper/0714.html

  10. A. Tareen, “Next generation broadband access networks evolving market structure and implications of network neutrality regulation,” in 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS), 2011, pp. 280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Coucheney, P. Maille, and B. Tuffin, “Impact of competition between isps on the net neutrality debate,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–9, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Bany Mohammed and J. Altmann, “A funding and governing model for achieving sustainable growth of computing e-infrastructures,” Annals of Telecommunications - Annales des Telecommunications, vol. 65, no. 11-12, pp. 739–756, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12243-010-0188-9

  13. S. Jordan, “Traffic Management and Net Neutrality in Wireless Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 297–309, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Ganley and B. Allgrove, “Net neutrality: A user’s guide”, Computer Law & Security Report, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 454–463, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. van Schewick and D. Farber, “Point/Counterpoint Network neutrality nuances,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 31–37, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Greenstein, “Four nightmares for net neutrality,” Micro, IEEE, vol. 26, pp. 12–13, November/December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Deeb, S. P. O. Sr., and M. E. Weiner, “A survey on network neutrality; a new form of discrimination based on network profiling,” International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 426–436, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Ohm, “When network neutrality met privacy,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 30–32, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Odlyzko, “The delusions of net neutrality,” August 2008, available at: http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/, downloaded on 2010-11-02.

  20. A. Joch, “Debating net neutrality,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 14–15, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  21. U. F. C. Commission, “PRESERVING THE FREE AND OPEN INTERNET,” http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FFCC-10-201A1_Rcd.pdf, December 2010, commision Report.

  22. B. Kim, “A comparison of network neutrality debates between US and South Korea,” in Proc. 11th international conference on Advanced Communication Technology, ICACT 2009.   Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press, February 2009, pp. 1785–1790.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Larouche, “Law and technology: The network neutrality debate hits Europe,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 22–24, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Goth, “The Global Net Neutrality Debate: Back to Square One?” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 7–9, July 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Kitsing, “Network neutrality in europe,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ser. ICEGOV ’11.   New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2011, pp. 313–316. [Online]. Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2072069.2072126

  26. X. Xiao, Technical, Commercial and Regulatory Challenges of QoS: An Internet Service Model Perspective. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. M. B. Tariq, M. Motiwala, N. Feamster, and M. Ammar, “Detecting network neutrality violations with causal inference,” in Proc. 5th international conference on Emerging networking experiments and technologies, CoNEXT 2009, New York, NY, USA, December 2009, pp. 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jerzy Domżał .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Domżał, J., Wójcik, R., Jajszczyk, A. (2015). Flow-Aware Networking for Net Neutrality. In: Guide to Flow-Aware Networking. Computer Communications and Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24975-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24975-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24973-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24975-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics