Abstract
In this paper we describe a new approach that uses multi-criteria decision making and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for integrating privacy and safety criteria into planning tasks. We apply the approach to the journey planning using two criteria: (i) a willingness-to-share-data (WSD) metric to control data disclosure, and (ii) the number of unsatisfied safety preferences (USP) metric to mitigate risky journeys.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We use term safety to encompass physical security, physiological harm (pollution), physical harm (attack), psychological fear (crowding), etc.
References
André, P., et al.: Journey planning based on user needs. In: CHI 2007 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2025–2030. ACM (2007)
Andrikopoulos, V., et al.: A game theoretic approach for managing multi-modal urban mobility systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2014). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Kraków, Poland, July 2014
Andrikopoulos, V., Bucchiarone, A., Gómez Sáez, S., Karastoyanova, D., Mezzina, C.A.: Towards modeling and execution of collective adaptive systems. In: Lomuscio, A.R., Nepal, S., Patrizi, F., Benatallah, B., Brandić, I. (eds.) ICSOC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8377, pp. 69–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Barker, T.J., Zabinsky, Z.B.: A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega 39(5), 558–573 (2011)
Beirão, G., Cabral, J.S.: Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp. Policy 14(6), 478–489 (2007)
Breaux, T.: Privacy requirements in an age of increased sharing. IEEE Softw. 31(5), 24–27 (2014)
Calavia, L.: A semantic autonomous video surveillance system for dense camera networks in smart cities. Sens. 12(8), 10407–10429 (2012)
Caragliu, A., et al.: Smart cities in europe. J. Urban Technol. 18(2), 65–82 (2011)
De Cristofaro, E., Di Pietro, R.: Adversaries and countermeasures in privacy-enhanced urban sensing systems. IEEE Syst. J. 7(2), 311–322 (2013)
Eboli, L., Mazzulla, G.: A methodology for evaluating transit service quality based on subjective and objective measures from the passengers point of view. Transp. Policy 18(1), 172–181 (2011)
Ferraz, F.S., Ferraz, C.A.G.: Smart city security issues: depicting information security issues in the role of an urban environment. In: 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, pp. 842–847. IEEE (2014)
Flammini, F., Gaglione, A., Mazzocca, N., Pragliola, C.: Quantitative Security risk assessment and management for railway transportation infrastructures. In: Setola, R., Geretshuber, S. (eds.) CRITIS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5508, pp. 180–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Ho, W., et al.: Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202(1), 16–24 (2010)
Kim, J., et al.: Hybrid choice models: principles and recent progress incorporating social influence and nonlinear utility functions. Procedia Environ. Sci. 22, 20–34 (2014)
Koppelman, F.S.: Non-linear utility functions in models of travel choice behavior. Transp. 10(2), 127–146 (1981)
Loukaitou-Sideris, A., Eck, J.E.: Crime prevention and active living. Am. J. Health Promot. 21(4s), 380–389 (2007)
Lynch, G., Atkins, S.: The influence of personal security fears on women’s travel patterns. Transp. 15(3), 257–277 (1988)
Mahmoud, M., Hine, J.: Using AHP to measure the perception gap between current and potential users of bus services. Transp. Plann. Technol. 36(1), 4–23 (2013)
Martinez-Balleste, A., et al.: The pursuit of citizens’ privacy: a privacy-aware smart city is possible. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(6), 136–141 (2013)
Nam, T., Pardo, T.A.: Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging Times, pp. 282–291. ACM (2011)
Patsakis, C., Solanas, A.: Privacy-aware event data recorders: cryptography meets the automotive industry again. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51(12), 122–128 (2013)
Saaty, T.L.: What is the analytic hierarchy process? In: Mitra, G., Greenberg, H.J., Lootsma, F.A., Rijkaert, M.J., Zimmermann, H.J. (eds.) Mathematical Models for Decision Support. NATO ASI Series, vol. 48, pp. 109–121. Springer, Heidelberg (1988)
Schaffers, H., et al.: Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In: Domingue, J., et al. (eds.) FI. LNCS, vol. 6656, pp. 431–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Srinivas, N., Deb, K.: Muiltiobjective optimization using nondominated sorting in genetic algorithms. Evol. Comput. 2(3), 221–248 (1994)
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the 7th Framework EU-FET project ALLOW Ensembles (grant 600792).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lavygina, A., Russo, A., Dulay, N. (2015). Integrating Privacy and Safety Criteria into Planning Tasks. In: Foresti, S. (eds) Security and Trust Management. STM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24858-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24858-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24857-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24858-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)