Skip to main content

Standardized Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Pediatrics

Part of the book series: Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation ((CHS))

Abstract

This chapter will focus on the use of standardized and simulated patients in pediatric healthcare education. The chapter will begin with a section on common terms and definitions followed by a review of the Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) standards of best practice. General information with regard to recruiting and training will be provided, and the differences in training for formative and summative assessments will be discussed. The use of children and adolescents as standardized and simulated patients will also be explored. Current trends in pediatric simulation, including the use of standardized and simulated patients to improve communication, the development of interpersonal skills, and the delivery of difficult news, will be presented along with the use of hybrid simulations. The chapter will close with a discussion on the advantages and challenges of using standardized and simulated patients in pediatrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Barrows HS, Abrahamson S. The programmed patient: a technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. J Med Educ. 1964;39:802–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weaver M, Erby L. Standardized patients: a promising tool for health education and health promotion. Health Promot Pract. 2012;13(2):169–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Levine AI, Swartz MH. Standardized patients: the “other” simulation. J Crit Care. 2008;23(2):179–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vukin E, Greenberg R, Auerbach M, Chang L, Scotten M, Tenney-Soeiro R, et al. Use of simulation-based education: a national survey of pediatric clerkship directors. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14(4):369–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reed S, Shell R, Kassis K, Tartaglia K, Wallihan R, Smith K, et al. Applying adult learning practices in medical education. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2014;44(6):170–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Szauter K. Adding the human dimension to simulation scenarios. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(2):79–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallace P. Coaching standardized patients for use in the assessment of clinical competence. New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Association of Standardized Patient Educators. Standards of Practice (draft). 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Howley LD. Standardized patients. In: Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, Sim AJ, editors. The comprehensive textbook of healthcare simulation. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 173–90.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Bokken L, van Dalen J, Rethans J-J. The case of “Miss Jacobs”: adolescent simulated patients and the quality of their role playing, feedback, and personal impact. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(6):315–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nestel D, Tabak D, Tierney T, Layat-Burn C, Robb A, Clark S, et al. Key challenges in simulated patient programs: an international comparative case study. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:69.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Zabar S, Kachur E, Kalet A, Hanley K. Objective structured clinical examinations: 10 steps to planning and implementing OSCEs and other standardized patient exercises. New York: Springer; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pascucci RC, Weinstock PH, O’Connor BE, Fancy KM, Meyer EC. Integrating actors into a simulation program: a primer. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(2):120–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Crow KM. Families and patients as actors in simulation: adding unique perspectives to enhance nursing education. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012;27(6):765–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carson JA, Peets A, Grant V, McLaughlin K. The effect of gender interactions on students’ physical examination ratings in objective structured clinical examination stations. Acad Med. 2010;85(11):1772–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrows HS. Training standardized patients to have physical findings. Springfield: Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kurtz SM, Silverman DJ, Draper J, van Dalen J, Platt FW. Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. 2nd ed. United Kingdom: Radcliffe Publishing; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Erby LA, Roter DL, Biesecker BB. Examination of standardized patient performance: accuracy and consistency of six standardized patients over time. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85(2):194–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheng A, Auerbach M, Hunt EA, Chang TP, Pusic M, Nadkarni V, et al. Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):1091–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Woodward CA, Gliva‐McConvey G. Children as standardized patients: initial assessment of effects. Teach Learn Med Int J. 1995;7(3):188–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brown R, Doonan S, Shellenberger S. Using children as simulated patients in communication training for residents and medical students: a pilot program. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1114–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fertel BS, Kohlhoff SA, Roblin PM, Arquilla B. Lessons from the “Clean Baby 2007” pediatric decontamination drill. Am J Disaster Med. 2009;4(2):77–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Holland B, Landry K, Mountain A, Middlebrooks MA, Heim D, Missildine K. Weaving the tapestry of learning: simulation, standardized patients, and virtual communities. Nurse Educ. 2013;38(6):269–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lane JL, Ziv A, Boulet JR. A pediatric clinical skills assessment using children as standardized patients. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153(6):637–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowe AK, Onikpo F, Lama M, Deming MS. Evaluating health worker performance in Benin using the simulated client method with real children. Implement Sci. 2012;7(1):95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai TC. Using children as standardised patients for assessing clinical competence in paediatrics. Arch Dis Child. 2004;89(12):1117–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Blake K, Greaven S. Adolescent girls as simulators of medical illness. Med Educ. 1999;33(9):702–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Blake KD, Gusella J, Greaven S, Wakefield S. The risks and benefits of being a young female adolescent standardised patient. Med Educ. 2006;40(1):26–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fallucco EM, Conlon MK, Gale G, Constantino JN, Glowinski AL. Use of a standardized patient paradigm to enhance proficiency in risk assessment for adolescent depression and suicide. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(1):66–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fallucco EM, Hanson MD, Glowinski AL. Teaching pediatric residents to assess adolescent suicide risk with a standardized patient module. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):953–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Felton A, Holliday L, Ritchie D, Langmack G, Conquer A. Simulation: a shared learning experience for child and mental health pre-registration nursing students. Nurse Educ Pract. 2013;13(6):536–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanson M, Tiberius R, Hodges B, Mackay S, McNaughton N, Dickens S, et al. Implications of suicide contagion for the selection of adolescent standardized patients. Acad Med. 2002;77(Suppl 10):S100–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hanson M, Tiberius R, Hodges B, MacKay S, McNaughton N, Dickens S, et al. Adolescent standardized patients: method of selection and assessment of benefits and risks. Teach Learn Med. 2002;14(2):104–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hanson MD, Niec A, Pietrantonio AM, Johnson S, Young M, High B, et al. Effects associated with adolescent standardized patient simulation of depression and suicidal ideation. Acad Med. 2007;82(Suppl 10):S61–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ozuah PO, Reznik M. Using unannounced standardized patients to assess residents’ competency in asthma severity classification. Ambul Pediatr. 2008;8(2):139–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Spencer J, Dales J. Meeting the needs of simulated patients and caring for the person behind them? Med Educ. 2006;40(1):3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Woods JL, Pasold TL, Boateng BA, Hensel DJ. Adolescent health care and the trainee: roles of self-efficacy, standardized patients, and an adolescent medicine rotation. Simul Healthc. 2013;8(6):359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shaffer D, Hicks R. Suicide. In: Pless B, editor. Epidemiology of childhood disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994. p. 339–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Peterson EB, Porter MB, Calhoun AW. A simulation-based curriculum to address relational crises in medicine. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):351–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Marken PA, Zimmerman C, Kennedy C, Schremmer R, Smith KV. Human simulators and standardized patients to teach difficult conversations to interprofessional health care teams. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010;74(7):120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gillett B, Peckler B, Sinert R, Onkst C, Nabors S, Issley S, et al. Simulation in a disaster drill: comparison of high-fidelity simulators versus trained actors. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1144–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wallace D, Gillett B, Wright B, Stetz J, Arquilla B. Randomized controlled trial of high fidelity patient simulators compared to actor patients in a pandemic influenza drill scenario. Resuscitation. 2010;81(7):872–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fehr JJ, Honkanen A, Murray DJ. Simulation in pediatric anesthesiology. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(10):988–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Konopasek L, Kelly KV, Bylund CL, Wenderoth S, Storey-Johnson C. The group objective structured clinical experience: building communication skills in the clinical reasoning context. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96(1):79–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Overly FL, Sudikoff SN, Duffy S, Anderson A, Kobayashi L. Three scenarios to teach difficult discussions in pediatric emergency medicine: sudden infant death, child abuse with domestic violence, and medication error. Simul Healthc. 2009;4(2):114–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tobler K, Grant E, Marczinski C. Evaluation of the impact of a simulation-enhanced breaking bad news workshop in pediatrics. Simul Healthc. 2014;9:213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ten Eyck RP. Simulation in emergency medicine training. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011;27(4):333–41 (quiz 42-4).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Cohen AG, Kitai E, David SB, Ziv A. Standardized patient-based simulation training as a tool to improve the management of chronic disease. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(1):40–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Greenberg LW, Ochsenschlager D, O’Donnell R, Mastruserio J, Cohen GJ. Communicating bad news: a pediatric department’s evaluation of a simulated intervention. Pediatrics. 1999;103(6 Pt 1):1210–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kennedy JL, Jones SM, Porter N, White ML, Gephardt G, Hill T, et al. High-fidelity hybrid simulation of allergic emergencies demonstrates improved preparedness for office emergencies in pediatric allergy clinics. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2013;1(6):608–17.e1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Siminoff LA, Rogers HL, Waller AC, Harris-Haywood S, Esptein RM, Carrio FB, et al. The advantages and challenges of unannounced standardized patient methodology to assess healthcare communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):318–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Palaganas J, Maxworthy J, Epps CA, Mancini MB, editors Defining excellence in simulation programs. New York: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dawn Taylor Peterson PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peterson, D. (2016). Standardized Patients. In: Grant, V., Cheng, A. (eds) Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation: Pediatrics. Comprehensive Healthcare Simulation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24187-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-24185-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-24187-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics