Skip to main content

Abstract

The global demand for food is rising steeply as a result of burgeoning population, shifting dietary preferences, and food wastage, while increasing demands for renewable energy are competing with food production (Hubert et al. 2010). In 2009, the FAO estimated that we must increase the global food production by 70 % to meet demands in 2050 (FAO 2009). But this figure is questioned and may be an underestimate, which further underlines the urgency of global food provisioning (Tilman 2010; Tilman et al. 2002), particularly in the light of the revised World Population Prospects 2012 predicting significantly higher population increase than earlier projections, especially for many countries in sub-Saharan Africa (UN 2013). Further, accelerating climate change is projected to have severe impacts on crop productivity over large parts of the globe (Porter et al. 2014). The combination of increasing water scarcity, as a result of climate warming, and increasing competition across sectors is likely to cause dramatic situations in terms of food and water security in many regions (Strzepek and Boehlert 2010). At the same time “business as usual is not an option.” This was the stern message from the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology (IAASTD) when it was presented by its chairman Bob Watson in 2008. By this he meant that agriculture does not deliver what we need—food security for all—instead it undermines the global environment in terms of land degradation; greenhouse gas emissions; pollution of soils, rivers, lakes, and oceans; and reducing biodiversity (Foley et al. 2011). The threat to food security represents a planetary emergency that demands a variety of creative solutions and policies at global, regional, and local levels. One of the most urgent responses to this situation must be measures to stop and reverse land degradation. But such solutions are currently hampered by the lack of reliable data as well as methods for collecting such data. This report is a review of the state of the art of remote sensing techniques for assessing land degradation and improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anyamba A, Tucker C (2005) Analysis of Sahelian vegetation dynamics using NOAA-AVHRR NDVI data from 1981–2003. J Arid Environ 63(3):596–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manag 24(3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierman R, Stocking M, Bouwman H, Cowie A, Diaz S, Granit J, Patwardhan A, Sims R, Duron G, Gorsevski V, Hammond T, Wellington-Moore C (2014) Delivering global environmental benefits for sustainable development. Report of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) to the 5th GEF Assembly, México 2014. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie A, Penman T, Gorissen L, Winslow M, Lehmann J, Tyrrell T, Twomlow S, Wilkes A, Lal R, Jones J (2011) Towards sustainable land management in the drylands: scientific connections in monitoring and assessing dryland degradation, climate change and biodiversity. Land Degrad Dev 22(2):248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2009) High level expert forum—how to feed the world in 2050. Office of the Director, Agricultural Development Economics Division, Economic and Social Development Department, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensholt R, Rasmussen K, Kaspersen P, Huber S, Horion S, Swinnen E (2013) Assessing land degradation/recovery in the African Sahel from long-term earth observation based primary productivity and precipitation relationships. Remote Sens 5(2):664–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, Mueller ND, O’Connell C, Ray DK, West PC (2011) Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GEF (2014) EF-6 programming directions. GEF/R.6/20/Rev.04, 31 March 2014. Global Environment Facility, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh MJ (2002) Land use, land cover and soil sciences—land rehabilitation, vol IV, Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). UNESCO-EOLSS, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann SM, Tappan GG (2013) Vegetation impoverishment despite greening: a case study from central Senegal. J Arid Environ 90:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann SM, Sall I, Sy O (2014) People and pixels in the Sahel: a study linking coarse-resolution remote sensing observations to land users’ perceptions of their changing environment in Senegal. Ecol Soc 19(3):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickler T, Eklundh L, Seaquist JW, Smith B, Ardö J, Olsson L, Sykes MT, Sjöström M (2005) Precipitation controls Sahel greening trend. Geophys Res Lett 32(21)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra JM, Boucher TM, Ricketts TH, Roberts C (2005) Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol Lett 8(1):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert B, Rosegrant M, van Boekel M, Ortiz R (2010) The future of food: scenarios for 2050. Crop Sci 50(Suppl 1):33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinzig AP, Ryan P, Etienne M, Allison H, Elmqvist T, Walker BH (2006) Resilience and regime shifts: assessing cascading effects. Ecol Soc 11(1):23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being. Statement from the Board. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Full Report. http://www.millenniumassessment.org

  • Orr BJ (2011) Scientific review of the UNCCD provisionally accepted set of impact indicators to measure the implementation of strategic objectives 1, 2 and 3. Office of Arid Lands Studies. University of Arizona, Arizona

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr BJ (2014) Personal communication on: the use of normalized difference vegetation index for land degradation assessment—country applications. Interviewed on 13 Oct 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrings C (1998) Resilience in the dynamics of economy-environment systems. Environ Resour Econ 11(3–4):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter JR, Xie L, Challinor A, Cochrane K, Mark Howden M, Iqbal MM, Lobell D, Travasso MT (2014) Food security and food production systems. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince SD, Colstoun D, Brown E, Kravitz L (1998) Evidence from rain‐use efficiencies does not indicate extensive Sahelian desertification. Glob Chang Biol 4(4):359–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renschler CS, Frazier A, Arendt L, Cimellaro G-P, Reinhorn AM, Bruneau M (2010) A framework for defining and measuring resilience at the community scale: the PEOPLES resilience framework. MCEER, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking M, Murnaghan N (2000) Land degradation–guidelines for field assessment. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich, p 121

    Google Scholar 

  • Strzepek K, Boehlert B (2010) Competition for water for the food system. Philos Trans R Soc, B 365(1554):2927–2940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorén H, Persson J (2014) A concept of resilience for sustainability science: some remarks on ostensive and stipulative definitions. Soc Nat Resour 11(1):64–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (2010) Understanding the present and projecting the future of global food demand. Paper presented at the AAAS Annual Meeting 2010, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, Cassman K, Matson P, Naylor R, Polasky S (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418(6898):671–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2013) World population prospects: the 2012 revision, highlights and advance tables. Working Paper, vol ESA/P/WP.228. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2007) Global environment outlook GEO4—environment for development. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2012a) Environment for the future we want. In: GEO 5—Global Environment Outlook. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2011) Millennium development goals report 2011. ISBN 978-92-1-101244-6. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4e42118b2.html. Accessed 1 Oct 2014

  • Vacik H, Wolfslehner B, Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2007) Integrating the DPSIR approach and the analytic network process for the assessment of forest management strategies. In: Reynolds K, Thomson A, Köhl M, Shannon M, Ray D, Rennolls K (eds) Sustainable forestry: from monitoring and modelling to knowledge management and policy science. CAB International, Cambridge, pp 393–411

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek P, Le Q, Tamene L (2010) Assessment of land degradation, its possible causes and threat to food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds) Food security and soil quality, Advances in soil science. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 57–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social—ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Abel N, Andreoni F, Cape J, Murdock H, Norman C (2014) General resilience: a discussion paper based on insights from a catchment management area workshop in South Eastern Australia. Resilience Alliance, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, A. 2002. Land degradation is contextual. Land Degradation & Development, 13(6), 449-459

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yengoh, G.T., Dent, D., Olsson, L., Tengberg, A.E., Tucker, C.J. (2015). Introduction. In: Use of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) to Assess Land Degradation at Multiple Scales. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24112-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics