Skip to main content

Prehospital Considerations for REVAR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
  • 1240 Accesses

Abstract

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) are associated with a high rate of mortality, ranging from 30 to 80 % [1]. These rates most likely underestimate the overall death rate since considerable numbers of these patients die from free rupture prior to presenting to the hospital [2]. As experience with elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has grown, it was inevitable that its use would be considered and studied in the ruptured setting, where open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was the reigning gold standard. Since elective EVAR had been associated with reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality, and results of open repair of ruptured AAAs had not significantly improved over the past several decades, several institutions initiated programs of EVAR for ruptured AAAs (REVAR) to evaluate whether the EVAR advantages extended to the ruptured state. Recent reports of such single institution series have shown that endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms led to both lower mortality and morbidity rates, suggesting that it becomes the standard of care for patients with ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with suitable anatomy [3, 4]. The recently published results of the IMPROVE trial reported no improvement in outcomes, other than discharge to home, for patients randomized to the REVAR strategy group [5]. However, analysis per treatment received rather than by strategy assigned revealed 30-day mortality rates of 26 % for REVAR and 37 % for open repair [6]. Reports such as these, showing REVAR to be at least as effective as open repair, coupled with increasing operator experience with aortic endografting have resulted in more surgeons having attained a level of comfort that allows them to consider adding REVAR to their therapeutic armamentarium. However, optimal outcomes from REVAR come not only from an isolated competent surgeon but also from a system of care that focuses on rapid diagnosis, permissive hypotension while awaiting treatment or during patient transfer, and therapy customized to the patient’s anatomy and coexisting conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Talledo O, Livesay J. Endovascular aneurysm repair is Not the treatment of choice in most patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Tex Heart Inst J. 2013;40(5):556–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Giles K, Hamdan A, Pomposelli F, et al. Population-based outcomes following endovascular and open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16(5):554–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Noel AA, Gloviczki P, Cherry KJ, et al. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: the excessive mortality rate of conventional repair. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:41–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sah D, Ozsvath K, Sternbach Y. Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg. 2007;44:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. The IMPROVE Trial Invetigators. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ. 2014;348.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Veith FJ, Rockman CB. Randomized trials show EVAR is the best option for ruptured AAAs. Endovasc Today. 2015; 65–70, and The recent randomized trials of EVAR versus open repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms are misleading. Vasc 2015;23:217–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgson KJ. EVAR for ruptured aneurysms: Are the data complete? Semin Vasc Surg. 2012;25:217–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manish Mehta MD, MPH. Endovascular aneurysm repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the Albany vascular group approach. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1706–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyle JR, Gibbs PJ, Kruger A, Shearman CP, Raptis S, Phillips MJ. Existing delays following the presentation of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm allow sufficient time to assess patients for endovascular repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005;29:505–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoshina K, Kato M, Miyahara T, et al. A retrospective study of intravascular ultrasound use in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair: its usefulness and a description of the procedure. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(5):559–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jordan Jr WD, Pearce BJ. Using IVUS during EVAR and TEVAR: improving patient outcomes. Semin Vasc Surg. 2009;22(3):172–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Criado E, Kabbani L, Cho K. Catheter-less angiography for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: a new application of carbon dioxide as a contrast agent. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(3):527–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehta M, Taggert J, Darling 3rd RC, Chang BB, Kreienberg PB, Paty PS, Roddy SP, Sternbach Y, Ozsvath KJ, Shah DM. Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis.asc. J Vasc Surg. 2006;44:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raux M, Marzelle J, Kobeiter H. Endovascular balloon occlusion is associated with reduced intraoperative mortality of unstable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm but fails to improve other outcomes. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61:304–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito N, Matsumoto H, Yagi T, et al. Evaluation of the safety and feasibility of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):897–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. The IMPROVE Trial Investigators. Observations from the IMPROVE trial concerning the clinical care of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2014;101:216–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dick F, Erdoes G, Opfermann P, Eberle B, Schmidli J, von Allmen RS. Delayed volume resuscitation during initial management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:943–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Vliet JA, van Aalst DL, Schultze Kppl LJ, Wever JJ, Blankensteijn JD. Hypotensive hemostatis (permissive hypotension) for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: are we really in control? Vascular. 2007;15:197–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lothert M, Pearce B, McKinsey K, et al. Integrating surgery and radiology in one suite. A multicenter study. J Vasc Surg. 2004;30:494–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kiguchi MM, Forbes TL, Teijink JA, et al. Clinical application and early outcomes of the aortouni-iliac configuration for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2014;60(6):1452–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Smit JG, van Marle J. Repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms with aorto-uni-iliac stent graft and femoro-femoral bypass. S Afr J Surg. 2012;50(2):33–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Torsello GB, Kasprazak B, Klenk E, Tessarek J, et al. Endovascular suture versus cutdown for endovascular aneurysm repair: a prospective randomized pilot study. J Vasc Surg. 2003;38(1):78–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McNally M, Scali S, Freezor RJ, et al. Three-dimensional fusion computed tomography decreases radiation exposure, procedure time, and contrast use during fenestrated endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;61(2):309–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Davies M, Younes H, Harris P, et al. Outcomes before and after initiation of an acute aortic treatment center. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52:1478–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brooke BS, Perler BA, Dominici F, Makary MA, Pronovost PJ. Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leap- frog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:1155–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarangarm D, Knepper J, Marek J, et al. Post-endovascular aneurysm repair patient outcomes and follow-up are not adversely impacted by long travel distance to tertiary vascular surgery centers. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010;24(8):1075–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Vogel TR, Nackman GB, Brevetti LS, et al. Resource utilization and outcomes: effect of transfer on patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2005;19(2):140–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krummel TM. Surgical simulation and virtual reality; the coming revolution. Ann Surg. 1998;228:635–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson W, Baril D, Taha O, et al. Simulation-based training to teach open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to surgical residents requires dedicated faculty instruction. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:247–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aggarwal A, Undre S, Moorthy K. The simulated operating theatre: comprehensive training for surgical teams. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13 Suppl 1:i27–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim J. Hodgson MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pan, J., Hodgson, K.J. (2017). Prehospital Considerations for REVAR. In: Starnes, B., Mehta, M., Veith, F. (eds) Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23844-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23844-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23843-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23844-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics