Skip to main content

The Political and Moral Economies of Dual Technology Transfers: Arming Police Drones

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Drones and Unmanned Aerial Systems

Abstract

This chapter argues that the transfer of military drone technology to civilian uses is more complicated than what is commonly envisioned in the scholarship addressing the militarization of policing. As a consequence of legitimacy problems—stemming from the drone wars—the drone industry is engaging in the strategic mobilization of the moral economy, with the goal of shifting the existing moral landscape. One outcome of such efforts is the emergence of the “public order” drone, whose purposes encompass both firefighting and law enforcement. Focusing on the armed police drone, a subset of the public order drone, the chapter offers an inventory of the moral economy that is at play. In particular, the chapter suggests that the arming of police drones should be thought of as a process, rather than as a one-time technological breakthrough or political decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter relies on a broad conceptualization of the “drone industry”: As used here, the term refers mainly to US-based military manufacturers but also to established Israeli and European military manufacturers as well as to start-up manufacturers in the USA and elsewhere.

  2. 2.

    While this definition of moral economy is useful, it is difficult to gauge its origin. There are several examples of unattributed uses in scholarly works. Building on the seminal contributions of E. P. Thompson and James Scott on moral economies in pre-market and traditional societies, contemporary scholarship emphasizes the notion that there is a “moral economy” that shapes habits and norms in the economic sphere and also lends legitimacy to the constitution of the economy and markets, and to the allocation of social goods. The term is often invoked in discussions of actors who have been deprived of social justice (Thompson 1971; Scott 1976; Arnold 2001; Mau 2004; Karstedt and Farrall 2006).

  3. 3.

    For a discussion of the moral economy of humanitarian drones, see Sandvik and Lohne (2014).

  4. 4.

    I will note, but not delve further into, emergent criticism focusing on an alleged “emptiness” and token interdisciplinarity in the burgeoning scholarship emerging from these insights (Neocleous 2014).

  5. 5.

    The boomerang effect is where control technologies deployed abroad in colonial and military campaigns “boomerang” back to the metropole to be deployed against “homefront” populations (Wall 2013, p. 34).

  6. 6.

    This paragraph builds on insights from Sandvik (forthcoming).

  7. 7.

    While operators of larger UAVs have their own military occupational specialties and belong to units dedicated to that purpose, Marines using the smallest UAVs have received training on a catch-as-catch-can basis (Sanborn 2012).

  8. 8.

    This section builds on Sandvik (forthcoming 2015).

  9. 9.

    The issue of less lethal weapons is hugely controversial (see McCray 2012).

  10. 10.

    As a side note, the internet is home to a fascinating proliferation of phoney footage depicting functioning weaponized drones; by both depicting an ideal type and offering the promise of technical feasibility, these images make important contributions to the constitution of the armed police drone (Johnson 2012).

  11. 11.

    Ben Hayes and Eric Toepfer suggest that in many scenarios developed for the European Union (EU), drones look more like a solution looking for a problem than vice versa. At a drone conference, a drone manufacturer acknowledged as much to a representative from Statewatch, an independent organization that monitors civil liberties in the EU: “You’re quite right. We don’t actually know what the problem is; we just know that the solution is UAVs” (Hayes et al. 2014).

  12. 12.

    According to the ACLU, the proliferation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams, the arming of police with weapons of war, and the use of hyperaggressive tactics escalates the risk of needless violence, destroys property, and undermines individual liberties (ACLU 2014), particularly in poor neighborhoods and communities of color (ACLU 2013). In March 2014, provincial police in Ontario, Canada, used drones to monitor First Nations protests about the issue of missing and murdered aboriginal women (Bowman 2014).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Bergtora Sandvik .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sandvik, K. (2016). The Political and Moral Economies of Dual Technology Transfers: Arming Police Drones. In: Završnik, A. (eds) Drones and Unmanned Aerial Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23760-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23760-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23759-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23760-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics