Abstract
Based on a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model with heterogeneous households, this paper analyzes the effects of positional preferences on the interaction between the distribution of wealth and endogenous economic growth. Households exhibit positional preferences, i.e., they derive utility not only from their own consumption level, they are also concerned about their wealth-rank, i.e., their relative wealth position in the distribution of wealth in the society. Contrary to adopting ad hoc assumptions regarding the specification of the wealth rankings, we demonstrate that the distribution of wealth ranks necessarily follows a power law. Under this power law, individual wealth growth rates differ, although the aggregate distribution converges to a stationary distribution in the balanced growth path. Differences in individual growth rates are due to differences in the return to households’ assets (e.g., differences in the return to one’s human capital—considered as part of the total capital). Moreover, the endogenous growth rate is shown to strongly depend on the power-law exponent, which is itself an endogenous variable that is determined by the standard deviation of the individual growth rates and the minimum level of the wealth distribution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Different authors employ various terms, with slightly varying meanings, to describe positional preferences. These terms include (negative) consumption externality, relative wealth or consumption, jealousy, envy, keeping or catching up with the Joneses, external habits, positional concerns, conspicuous wealth or consumption. In this article, we use these terms synonymously, though we focus on relative wealth.
- 2.
We may consider a government that redistributes income—in a budget neutral way—so as to ensure a minimum income of the poorest households.
- 3.
Observe that the cumulated distribution function is given by \(F(\omega ) = 1 - (\omega /\omega _{min})^{-\kappa }\).
- 4.
The relationship between the shape of the distribution function and the Gini-coefficient is given in Appendix.
References
Alesina A, Rodrik D (1994) Distributive politics and economic growth. Q J Econ 109:465–490
Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2005) How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? J Econ Behav Organ 56:405–421
Alvarez-Cuadrado F, Casado JM, Labeaga JM, Sutthiphisal D (2012) Envy and habits: panel data estimates of interdependent preferences. Banco de Espana working paper 1213. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2014005+
Bertola G (1993) Factor shares and savings in endogenous growth. Am Econ Rev 83:1184–1198
Cowan R, Cowan W, Swann GMP (2004) Waves in consumption with interdependence among consumers. Can J Econ 37:149–177
Corneo G, Jeanne O (2001) Status, the distribution of wealth, and growth. Scand J Econ 103(2):283–293
Darwin C (1871) The descent of men and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London
Easterlin RA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? J Econ Behav Organ 27:35–47
Fehr E, Schmidt K (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q J Econ 114:817–868
Ferrer-I-Carbonell A (2005) Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect. J Public Econ 89:997–1019
Gabaix X (2009) Power laws in economics and finance. Annu Rev Econ 1:255–293
Groth C, Wendner R (2014) Embodied learning by investing and speed of convergence. J Macroecon 40:245–269
Johansson-Stenman O, Carlsson F, Daruvala D (2002) Measuring future grandparents’ preferences for equality and relative standing. Econ J 112:362–383
Johansson-Stenman O, Martinsson P (2006) Honestly, why are you driving a BMW? J Econ Behav Organ 60:129–146
Jones CI (2014) Pareto and Piketty: the macroeconomics of top income and wealth inequality. NBER working paper 20742
Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. Q J Econ 120:963–1002
Mujcic R, Frijters P (2013) Economic choices and status: measuring preferences for income rank. Oxf Econ Pap 65:47–73
OECD (2011), Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/dividedwestandwhyinequalitykeepsrising.htm
OECD (2014) Growth and inequality: a close relationship? http://www.oecd.org/economy/growth-and-inequality-close-relationship.htm
Ostry JD, Andrew B, Tsangarides CG (2014) Redistribution, inequality, and growth. IMF staff discussion note SDN 14/02
Oswald AJ (2004) Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. J Public Econ 88:1359–1386
Pareto V (1897) Cours d’économie politique, Lausanne: F. Rouge
Persson T, Tabellini G (1994) Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Am Econ Rev 84:600–621
Piketty T (2014) Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Reed WJ (2003) The Pareto law of incomes - an explanation and an extension. Physica A 319:469–486
Smith A (1759) The theory of moral sentiments. In: Raphael DD, Macfie AL (eds) (1976). The theory of moral sentiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Solnik SJ, Hemenway D (1998) Is more always better? A survey on positional concerns. J Econ Behav Organ 37:373–383
Solnik SJ, Hemenway D (2005) Are positional concerns stronger in some domains than in others? Am Econ Rev 95:147–151
Stark O, Taylor JE (1991) Migration incentives, migration types: the role of relative deprivation. Econ J 101:1163–1178
Truyts T (2010) Social status in economic theory. J Econ Surv 24:137–169
Veblen T (1899) The theory of the leisure class, in the theory of the leisure class. Houghton-Mifflin edition (1973). Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
The Gini coefficient \(\Gamma \) of a continuous distribution F(w) is given by
where μ denotes the distribution’s mean. If the distribution F(w) follows a power-law with \(F(w) = \left (\frac{w_{min}} {w} \right )^{\kappa }\) and w min ≤ w, \(\mu = \frac{\kappa } {\kappa -1}w_{min}\) and the equation above is solved by
yielding the Gini coefficient
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kleinert, J., Wendner, R. (2016). Status, Wealth Distribution, and Endogenous Economic Growth. In: Bednar-Friedl, B., Kleinert, J. (eds) Dynamic Approaches to Global Economic Challenges. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23324-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23324-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23323-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23324-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)