Skip to main content

Abstract

The treaty of Rome was signed in 1957 and it started a continuous process of strengthening the internal integration of the EU. In this study, we consider the economic effects of intensified trade integration within the Union in which productive factors are also mobile. We argue that a New Economic Geography (NEG) perspective is preferable to the Heckscher-Ohlin approach. We show that trade integration leads to specialization, trade creation, and trade diversion (as predicted by a standard Heckscher-Ohlin framework), but it may also lead to agglomeration within the Union, which is typical of a NEG framework. We show that these agglomeration processes reinforce the specialization and trade effects of trade integration. Finally, we provide insights into the dynamic processes and show that the coexistence of attractors in our modeling approach is more pervasive than in a standard NEG framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The structure of our model is similar to the three-country linear core periphery model proposed by Behrens, 2011.

  2. 2.

    Ingrid Kubin dedicates this section to Karl Framer with whom she detected the complexity of complex dynamics almost 30 years ago.

References

  • Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2004) Trade costs. J Econ Lit 42(3):691–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrens K (2001) International integration and regional inequalities: how important is national infrastructure? Manch Sch 79(5):952–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart M (2011) The spatial effects of trade openness: a survey. Rev World Econ 147(1):59–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart M, Crozet M, Koenig P (2004) Enlargement and the EU periphery: the impact of changing market potential. World Econ 27(6):853–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commendatore P, Kubin I, Petraglia C, Sushko I (2014) Regional integration, international liberalisation and the dynamics of industrial agglomeration. J Econ Dyn Control 48:265–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commendatore P, Filosofo V, Kubin I, Grafeneder-Weissteiner T (2015) Towards a multiregional NEG framework: comparing alternative modelling strategies. In: Commendatore P, Kubin I, Suna Kayam S (eds) Complexity and geographical economics. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 19. Springer, Cham Heidelberg/New York, Dordrecht/London, pp 13–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorrucci E, Firpo S, Fratzscher M, Monelli FP (2002) European integration: what lessons for other regions? The case of Latin America. ECB working paper 185, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Gáková Z, Dijkstra L (2008) Labour mobility between the regions of the EU-27 and a comparison with the USA. Technical report 2, European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P, Livas Elizondo P (1996) Trade policy and the third world metropolis. J Dev Econ 49(1):137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milnor J (1985) On the concept of attractor. Commun Math Phys 99:177–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld M, Peri G (1998) Regional non-adjustment and fiscal policy. Econ Policy 13(26):205–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottaviano G, Tabuchi T, Thisse J-F (2002) Agglomeration and trade revisited. Int Econ Rev 43(2):409–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluzie E (2001) Trade policy and regional inequalities. Pap Reg Sci 80(1):67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puga D (2001) European regional policies in light of recent location theories. J Econ Geogr 2(4):373–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert H (1997) Labor market rigidities: at the root of unemployment in Europe. J Econ Perspect 11(3):37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushko I, Gardini L (2010) Degenerate bifurcations and border collisions in piecewise smooth 1D and 2D maps. Int J Bifurcation Chaos 20(7):2045–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trefler D (1995) The case of the missing trade and other mysteries. Am Econ Rev 85(5):1029–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zheng X-P (2013a) Industrial agglomeration and dispersion in gate and hinterland regions. Ritsumeikan Econ Rev 62(1):39–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Zheng X-P (2013b) Industrial agglomeration: asymmetry of regions and trade costs. Rev Urban Reg Dev Stud 25(2):61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Kubin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Commendatore, P., Kubin, I., Sushko, I. (2016). Trade Agreements and Regional Disparities. In: Bednar-Friedl, B., Kleinert, J. (eds) Dynamic Approaches to Global Economic Challenges. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23324-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics