Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Education, Equity, Economy ((EEEC,volume 3))

Abstract

Many educators desire to see technology as a panacea for inequity in education. In this chapter, I argue that technology can, for now, best serve civic research by providing new lines of communication and capture moments of democratic teaching and learning in action. Through the Brooklyn Public Scholars project, I sought to undertake a six-semester curriculum design process with students to focus on three generative themes in the humanities: difference, democratic thinking, and community. These efforts to bring a humanities perspective to democratic decision-making encouraged me to expand my civic education aspirations to explicitly include my own research into the course curriculum. However, Hurricane Sandy brought to the fore levels of resistance to using digital technology as well as opportunities to make technology adaptable to student needs. Because some students exhibited disruptive and self-defeating behaviors in our online learning environments a creative use of technology supplemented the work we were doing in the college to solve modern challenges in and out of the classroom. This chapter explores how technology integration in meaningful civic education is a must, not an add-on, and argues that we have to provide learners with the digital tools necessary to collaborate globally on pressing modern challenges requiring innovative solutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In order to protect the identity of students I have changed their names.

References

  • Bean, J. C. (2001). Engaging ideas: The professors guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coke, P. K. (2009). When digital natives hate technology: Using digital wisdom to confront resistance in the composition classroom. California English, 15(1), 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhari, R., Mitra, B., & Dalpes, P. (2013). Civic learning for all students: An institutional priority. Diversity & Democracy, 4(16), 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg, M. B. (2011). Transformative professional learning: A system to enhance teacher and student motivation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. B. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F., & Knox, T. M. (1952). Hegel’s philosophy of right. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayorga, E. (2014). Toward digital, critical, participatory action research: Lessons from the #BarrioEdProj. New York: Journal of Interactive Technology and Pedagogy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medcalf, L. (1978). Law and identity: Lawyers, native Americans, and legal practice. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musil, C. (2006). Assessing global learning: Matching good intentions with good practice. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society for the Encouragement of the Arts. (2008). Changing paradigms. Retrieved from http://www.thersa.org/events/video/archive/sir-ken-robinson/

  • Semple, K. (2013, December 18). Immigration remakes and sustains New York, report finds. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/

  • Wlodkowski, R. J., & Ginsberg, M. B. (1995). Diversity and motivation: Culturally responsive teaching. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Leggett J.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leggett, J. (2016). Supporting Critical Civic Learning with Interactive Technology. In: Schnee, E., Better, A., Clark Cummings, M. (eds) Civic Engagement Pedagogy in the Community College: Theory and Practice. Education, Equity, Economy, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22945-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22945-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22944-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22945-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics