Abstract
Recent research on avian chemical signaling has highlighted the need for new appropriate protocols especially for sampling, and analyzing, compounds borne by individuals Although many studies have already examined the chemical substances secreted by birds, only few works have done so from the perspective of chemical communication and none have focused on the actual airborne compounds which make up the final odor. As well as the relative infancy of the field, this gap originates from the absence of an appropriate methodological framework. In this study, we provide a methodological guideline of various combinations of sampling and extraction techniques that have been developed and tested in our research. These include: analysis of (1) uropygial secretion samples by solvent extraction, (2) feather lipids by solvent extraction, (3) feather lipids by direct solid-phase thermal desorption, (4) cotton swab (rubbed on bird) by solid-phase microextraction (SPME), (5) cotton swab by direct solid-phase thermal desorption and (6) airborne volatiles by thermal desorption. To achieve this, we used the particular case study of blue petrels (Halobaena caerulea), a Subantarctic procellariiform seabird, living on remote islands and known for its good olfactory capabilities. Outcomes from the different methods are presented in terms of chromatographic quality, the number and properties of the analytes resolved, and their suitability for the work in isolated locations. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed together with challenges that remain to make the new protocols presented more robust for field chemo-ecologists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archie EA, Theis KR (2011) Animal behavior meets microbial ecology. Anim Behav 82:425–436
Baltussen E, Cramers CA, Sandra PJF (2002) Sorptive sample preparation – a review. Anal Bioanal Chem 373:3–22
Bonadonna F, Mardon J (2010) One house two families: petrel squatters get a sniff of low-cost breeding opportunities. Ethology 116:176–182
Bonadonna F, Mardon J (2013) Besides colours and songs, odour is the new black of avian communication. In: East ML, Dehnhard M (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 12. Springer, New York, pp 325–339
Bonadonna F, Nevitt GA (2004) Partner-specific odor recognition in an Antarctic seabird. Science 306:835
Bonadonna F, Caro S, Jouventin P, Nevitt GA (2006) Evidence that blue petrel, Halobaena Caerulea, fledglings can detect and orient to dimethyl sulfide. J Exp Biol 209:2165–2169
Bonadonna F, Miguel E, Grosbois V, Jouventin P, Bessiere JM (2007) Individual odor recognition in birds: an endogenous olfactory signature on petrels’ feathers? J Chem Ecol 33:1819–1829
Burger BV, Reiter B, Borzyk O, Du Plessis MA (2004) Avian exocrine secretions. I. Chemical characterization of the volatile fraction of the uropygial secretion of the green woodhoopoe, Phoeniculus purpureus. J Chem Ecol 30:1603–1611
Campagna S, Mardon J, Celerier A, Bonadonna F (2012) Potential semiochemical molecules from birds: a practical and comprehensive compilation of the last 20 years studies. Chem Senses 37:3–25
Caro SP, Balthazart J, Bonadonna F (2014) The perfume of reproduction in birds: chemosignaling in avian social life. Horm Behav. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.06.001
Celerier A, Bon C, Malapert A, Palmas P, Bonadonna F (2011) Chemical kin label in seabirds. Biol Lett 7:807–810
Dicke M, Vanbeek TA, Posthumus MA, Bendom N, Vanbokhoven H, Degroot AE (1990) Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predator-prey interactions – involvement of host plant in its production. J Chem Ecol 16:381–396
Douglas HD (2006) Measurement of chemical emissions in crested auklets (Aethia cristatella). J Chem Ecol 32:2559–2567
Drea CM, Boulet M, Del Barco-Trillo J, Greene LK, Sacha CR, Goodwin TE, Dubay GR (2013) The “secret” in secretions: methodological considerations in deciphering primate olfactory communication. Am J Primatol 75:621–642
Effmert U, Kalderas J, Warnke R, Piechulla B (2012) Volatile mediated interactions between bacteria and fungi in the soil. J Chem Ecol 38:665–703
Ezenwa VO, Williams AE (2014) Microbes and animal olfactory communication: where do we go from here? Bioessays 36:847–854
Guillot JM (2012) Odour measurement: focus on main remaining limits due to sampling. Chem Eng Trans 30:295–300
Guillot JM, Fernandez B, Cloirec PL (2000) Advantages and limits of adsorption sampling for physico-chemical measurements of odorous compounds. Analusis 28:180–187
Hagelin JC, Jones IL (2007) Bird odors and other chemical substances: defense mechanism or overlooked mode of intraspecific communication? Auk 124:741–761
He M, Chen BB, Hu B (2014) Recent developments in stir bar sorptive extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:2001–2026
Hewitt AD, Jenkins TF, Grant CL (1995) Collection, handling, and storage: keys to improved data quality for volatile organic compounds in soil. Am Environ Lab 2:25–28
Hudson DT, Curran AM, Furton KG (2009) The stability of collected human scent under various environmental conditions. J Forensic Sci 54:1270–1277
Hudson-Holness DT, Furton KG (2010) Comparison between human scent compounds collected on cotton and cotton blend materials for SPME-GC/MS analysis. J Forensic Res 1:101. doi:10.4172/2157-7145.1000101
Jacob J (1978) Uropygial gland secretions and feather waxes. In: Florkin M, Scheer BT (eds) Chemical zoology. Academic, New York, pp 165–211
Kean EF, Müller CT, Chadwick EA (2011) Otter scent signals age, sex and reproductive status. Chem Senses 36:555–564
Le Maho Y, Karmann H, Briot D, Handrich Y, Robin JP, Mioskowski E, Cherel Y, Farni J (1992) Stress in birds due to routine handling and a technique to avoid it. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 263:775–781
Mardon J, Bonadonna F (2009) Atypical homing or self-odour avoidance? Blue petrels (Halobaena caerulea) are attracted to their mate’s odour but avoid their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63:537–542
Mardon J, Saunders SM, Anderson MJ, Couchoux C, Bonadonna F (2010) Species, gender and identity: cracking petrels’ socio-chemical code. Chem Senses 35:309–321
Mardon J, Saunders SM, Bonadonna F (2011) From preen secretions to plumage: the chemical trajectory of petrels’ social scent. J Avian Biol 42:29–38
Mitra S, Burger BV, Poddar-Sarkar M (2013) Headspace volatile oxylipins of Eastern Himalayan moss Cyathophorella adiantume by sample enrichment probe. Lipids 48:997–1004
Moritz RFA, Crewe RM (1988) Chemical signals of queens in kin recognition of honeybees, Apis mellifera L. J Comp Physiol A 164:83–89
Nagata Y (2010) Measurement of odor threshold by triangle bag method. Environmental Sanitation Center, Kawasaki, pp 118–127
Nevitt GA, Veit RR, Kareiva P (1995) Dimethyl sulphide as a foraging cue for Antarctic procellariiform seabirds. Nature 376:680–682
Noble R, Hobbs PJ, Dobrovin-Pennington A, Misselbrook TH, Mead A (2001) Olfactory response to mushroom composting emissions as a function of chemical concentration. J Environ Qual 30:760–767
Prada PA, Curran AM, Furton KG (2010) Comparison of extraction methods for the removal of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) present in sorbents used for human scent evidence collection. Anal Methods 2:470–478
Röck F, Mueller S, Weimar U, Rammensee HG, Overath P (2006) Comparative analysis of volatile constituents from mice and their urine. J Chem Ecol 32:1333–1346
Rowan DD (2011) Volatile metabolites. Metabolites 1:41–63
Santos SM, Bernier UR, Allan SA, Quinn BP, Booth MM, Kline DL, Barnard DR, Yost RA (2005) Identification of candidate attractant compounds from chicken feathers for the mosquito vector of the West Nile virus by GC/MS. In: Proceedings of the 53rd ASMS conference on mass spectrometry and allied topics, San Antonio
Scientific Instrument Services Inc. (1995) Adsorbent resins guide (updated: 2009). http://www.sisweb.com/index/referenc/resins.htm
Shaw CL, Rutter JE, Austin AM, Garvin MC, Whelan RJ (2011) Volatile and semivolatile compounds in gray catbird uropygial secretions vary with and between breeding and wintering grounds. J Chem Ecol 37:329–339
Singer AG, Agosta WC, O’Connell RJ, Pfaffmann C, Bowen DV, Field FH (1976) Dimethyl disulfide: an attractant pheromone in hamster vaginal secretion. Science 191:948–950
Soini HA, Bruce KE, Wiesler D, David F, Sandra P, Novotny MV (2005) Stir bar sorptive extraction: a new quantitative and comprehensive sampling technique for determination of chemical signal profiles from biological media. J Chem Ecol 31:377–392
Soini HA, Schrock SE, Bruce KE, Wiesler D, Ketterson ED, Novotny MV (2007) Seasonal variation in volatile compound profiles of preen gland secretions of the dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). J Chem Ecol 33:183–198
Soini HA, Whittaker DJ, Wiesler D, Ketterson ED, Novotny MV (2013) Chemosignaling diversity in songbirds: chromatographic profiling of preen oil volatiles in different species. J Chromatogr A 1317:186–192
Syed Z, Leal WS (2009) Acute olfactory response of Culex mosquitoes to a human- and bird-derived attractant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:18803–18808
Tuttle EM, Sebastian PJ, Posto AL, Soini AH, Novotny MV, Gonser RA (2014) Variation in preen oil composition pertaining to season, sex, and genotype in the polymorphic white-throated sparrow. J Chem Ecol 40:1025–1038
Valenta JG, Rigby MK (1968) Discrimination of the odor of stressed rats. Science 161:599–601
Van Harreveld AP (2003) Odor concentration decay and stability in gas sampling bags. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 53:51–60
Whittaker DJ, Gerlach NM, Soini HA, Novotny MV, Ketterson ED (2013) Bird odour predicts reproductive success. Anim Behav 86:697–703
Wisthaler A, Weschler CJ (2010) Reactions of ozone with human skin lipids: sources of carbonyls, dicarbonyls, and hydroxycarbonyls in indoor air. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:6568–6575
Wyatt TD (2010) Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for identity in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A 196:685–700
Zarra T, Reiser M, Naddeo V, Belgiorno V, Kranert M (2012) A comparative and critical evaluation of different sampling materials in the measurement of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry. Chem Eng Trans 30:307–312
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) through the program ETHOTAAF no. 354 to FB, and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche Française (AMBO ANR-08-BLAN-0117-01 to FB). All aspects of the study were performed according to guidelines established by the IPEV and the CNRS for the ethical treatment of animals and complied with current French regulations. The authors wish to thank Tony Reader and Gavin Flemmati from the BBCS School of UWA, for their expertise on GC–MS techniques, and Heidi Woods and Michael Grocott from the ChemCentre, for technical assistance. Special thanks are also due to Aurélie Colomb from LaMP for her help on improving the parameters and the chromatographic outputs of Method 3. We finally thank Eleanor Kean to read over our manuscript. We would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for all their constructive and helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gabirot, M., Mardon, J., Campagna, S., West, N., Bonadonna, F., Saunders, S.M. (2016). Guidelines for Collecting and Extracting Avian Odors in a Remote Field: Case Study of a Subantarctic Seabird. In: Schulte, B., Goodwin, T., Ferkin, M. (eds) Chemical Signals in Vertebrates 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22026-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22026-0_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22025-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22026-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)