Abstract
In 1983 a mother suffering from serious mental illness alleged that Raymond Buckey, a teacher at the McMartin Preschool in Manhattan Beach, California, had molested her 2½-year-old son (Nathan & Snedeker, 2001). The accusations set off a highly publicized investigation and eventually led to the longest-running criminal trial in United States history. Based on accusations by dozens of children, Buckey, his mother Peggy, and five other preschool workers were charged with multiple counts of sexual abuse. Many children claimed that they had been forced to participate in bizarre events, such as being spirited into tunnels below the school to carry out satanic rituals. Eventually, Raymond and Peggy Buckey were acquitted by a jury and charges against the other defendants were dropped. At the Buckeys’ trial their attorneys presented video-recorded interviews of the alleged victims. Jurors later stated that these recordings, which showed interviewers questioning the children in a highly suggestive manner, heavily influenced their verdict to acquit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ackil, J. K., & Zaragoza, M. S. (1998). Memorial consequences of forced confabulation: Age differences in susceptibility to false memories. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1358–1372. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1358.
Aldridge, N. C. (1998). Strengths and limitations of forensic child sexual abuse interviews with anatomical dolls: An empirical review. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20(1), 1–41. doi:10.1023/A:1023084525733.
Ayers, M. S., & Reder, L. M. (1998). A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 1–21. doi:10.3758/BF03209454.
Beckett, K. (1996). Culture and the politics of signification: The case of child sexual abuse. Social Problems, 43(1), 57–76. doi:10.1525/sp.1996.43.1.03x0336x.
Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (1999). The suggestibility of children’s memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 419–439. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.419.
Bruck, M., & Ceci, S. J. (2011). Forensic developmental psychology in the courtroom. In D. Faust (Ed.), Coping with psychiatric and psychological testimony (6th ed., pp. 723–736). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., Melnyk, L., & Finkelberg, D. (1999, March). The effect of interviewer bias on the accuracy of children’s reports and interviewers’ reports. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Child Development. Albuquerque, NM.
Bruck, M., Melnyk, L., & Ceci, S. J. (2000). Draw it again Sam: The effect of drawing on children’s suggestibility and source monitoring ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77(3), 169–196. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2560.
Carol, R. (2014). ‘Other people’ and suggestibility: A child’s age predicts a source’s influence. Manuscript in preparation.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1994). How reliable are children’s statements? It depends. Family Relations, 43(3), 255–257. doi:10.2307/585411.
Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1995). Jeopardy in the courtroom: A scientific analysis of children’s testimony. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Ceci, S. J., Huffman, M. L. C., Smith, E., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Repeatedly thinking about a non-event: Source misattributions among preschoolers. Consciousness and Cognition, 3(3–4), 388–407. doi:10.1006/ccog.1994.1022.
Ceci, S. J., Loftus, E. F., Leichtman, M. D., & Bruck, M. (1994). The possible role of source misattributions in the creation of false beliefs among preschoolers. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42(4), 304–320. doi:10.1080/00207149408409361.
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson. ISBN 9780205609994.
Everson, M. D., & Boat, B. W. (1997). Anatomical dolls in child sexual abuse assessments: A call for forensically relevant research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, S55–S74. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:7<S55::AID-ACP521>3.0.CO;2-P.
Finnila, K., Mahlberg, N., Santtila, P., Sandnabba, K., & Niemi, P. (2003). Validity of a test of children’s suggestibility for predicting responses to two interview situations differing in their degree of suggestiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 32–49. doi:10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00025-0.
Foley, M. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: A developmental comparison. Child Development, 56, 1145–1155.
Garry, M., & Loftus, E. F. (1994). Pseudomemories without hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 42(4), 363–378. doi:10.1080/00207149408409365.
Garven, S., Wood, J. M., Malpass, R. S., & Shaw, J. S., III. (1998). More than suggestion: The effect of interviewing techniques from the McMartin preschool case. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 347–359. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.347.
Garven, S., Wood, J. M., & Malpass, R. S. (2000). Allegations of wrongdoing: The effects of reinforcement on children’s mundane and fantastic claims. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 38–49.
Goodman, G. S., & Quas, J. A. (2008). Repeated interviews and children’s memory: It’s more than just how many. Current Directions in Psychology Science, 17(6), 386–390. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00611.
Goodman, G. S., Quas, J. A., Batterman-Faunce, J., Riddlesberger, M. M., & Kuhn, J. (1997). Children’s reactions to and memory for a stressful event: Influences of age, anatomical dolls, knowledge, and parental attachment. Applied Developmental Science, 1(2), 54–75. doi:10.1207/s1532480xads0102_1.
Harrigan, N., Achananuparp, P., & Lim, E. (2012). Influentials, novelty, and social contagion: The viral power of average friends, close communities, and old news. Social Networks, 34(4), 470–480. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2012.02.005.
Herman, S. (2010). The role of corroborative evidence in child sexual abuse evaluations. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 189–213. doi:10.1002/jip.122.
Jones, R. L. (2013). The effect of co-witness information and individual differences in cognitive abilities on the suggestibility of pre-school children (Doctoral dissertation). UMI number 3609492.
Kassin, S. M., Dror, I. E., & Kukucka, J. (2013). The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 42–52.
Krähenbühl, S., & Blades, M. (2006). The effect of question repetition within interviews on young children’s eyewitness recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.002.
La Rooy, D., Pipe, M. E., & Murray, J. E. (2005). Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children’s eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 235–254. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.11.002.
Lamb, M. E. (1994). The investigation of child sexual abuse: An interdisciplinary consensus statement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 1021–1028.
Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. Mahwah, NJ: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-51866-3.
Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Sternberg, K. J., Boat, B., & Everson, M. D. (1996). Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(12), 1251–1259. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00121-4.
Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1995). The effects of stereotypes and suggestions on preschoolers’ reports. Developmental Psychology, 31(4), 568–578. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.568.
Markham, R., Howie, P., & Hlavacek, S. (1999). Reality monitoring in auditory and visual modalities: Developmental trends and effects of cross-modal imagery. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72(1), 51–70. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2476.
Mazzoni, G. A. L., Loftus, E. F., & Kirsch, I. (2001). Changing beliefs about implausible autobiographical events: A little plausibility goes a long way. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(1), 51–59. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.7.1.51.
Nathan, D., & Snedeker, M. (2001). Satan’s silence: Ritual abuse and the making of the modern American witch hunt. San Jose, CA: Author’s Choice Press. ISBN 0-595-18955-5.
Otgaar, H., Candel, I., Merckelbach, H., & Wade, K. A. (2009). Abducted by a UFO: Prevalence information affects young children’s false memories for an implausible event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 115–125. doi:10.1002/acp.1445.
Otgaar, H., Candel, I., Smeets, T., & Merckelbach, H. (2010). ‘You didn’t take Lucy’s skirt off’: The effect of misleading information on omissions and commissions in children’s memory reports. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 229–241. doi:10.1348/135532509X471951.
Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., & Peters, M. (2012). Children’s implanted false memories and additional script knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26(5), 709–715. doi:10.1002/acp.2849.
Paterson, H. M., Kemp, R. I., & Ng, J. R. (2011). Combating co-witness contamination: Attempting to decrease the negative effects of discussion on eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 43–52. doi:10.1002/acp.1640.
Poole, D. A., & Lamb, M. E. (1998). Investigative interviews of children: A guide for helping professionals. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Poole, D. A., & White, L. T. (1991). Effects of question repetition on the eyewitness testimony of children and adults. Developmental Psychology, 27, 975–986. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.6.975.
Powell, M. B., Hughes-Scholes, C. H., & Sharman, S. J. (2012). Skill in interviewing reduces confirmation bias. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9, 126–134.
Quas, J. A., Schaaf, J. M., Alexander, K. W., & Goodman, G. S. (2000). Do you really remember it happening or do you only remember being asked about it happening? Children’s source monitoring in forensic contexts. In K. P. Roberts & M. Blades (Eds.), Children’s source monitoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Salmon, K. (2001). Remembering and reporting by children: The influence of cues and props. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(2), 267–300. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00048-3.
Santila, P., Korkman, J., & Sandnabba, N. K. (2004). Effects of interview phase, repeated interviewing, presence of a support person, and anatomically detailed dolls on child sexual abuse interviews. Psychology Crime and Law, 10, 21–35. doi:10.1080/1068316021000044365.
Schreiber, N., Bellah, L. D., Martinez, Y., McLaurin, K. A., Strok, R., Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (2006). Suggestive interviewing in the McMartin Preschool and Kelly Michaels Daycare abuse cases: A case study. Social Influence, 1(1), 16–47. doi:10.1080/15534510500361739
Schreiber, N., & Parker, J. F. (2004). Inviting witnesses to speculate: Effects of age and interaction on children’s recall. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 31–52.
Seidler, K. M., & Howie, P. M. (1999). Motivational factors in children’s reporting of events: The influence of age and expected reinforcement contingency. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 101–118. doi:10.1016/S0193-3973(99)80006-9.
Shapiro, L. R., & Purdy, T. L. (2005). Suggestibility and source monitoring errors: Blame the interview style, interviewer consistency, and the child’s personality. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(4), 489–506. doi:10.1002/acp.1093.
Shaw, J. S. I., II, Garven, S., & Wood, J. M. (1997). Co-witness information can have immediate effects on eyewitness memory reports. Law and Human Behavior, 21(5), 503–523. doi:10.1023/A:1024875723399.
Stolzenberg, S., & Pezdek, K. (2013). Interviewing child witnesses: The effect of forced confabulation on event memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(1), 77–88. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.006.
Strange, D., Garry, M., & Sutherland, R. (2003). Drawing out children’s false memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(5), 607–619. doi:10.1002/acp.911.
Strange, D., Hayne, H., & Garry, M. (2008). A photo, a suggestion, a false memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(5), 587–603. doi:10.1002/acp.1390.
Strange, D., Sutherland, R., & Garry, M. (2006). Event plausibility does not determine children’s false memories. Memory, 14(8), 937–951. doi:10.1080/09658210600896105.
Sutherland, R., & Hayne, H. (2001). Age-related changes in the misinformation effect. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(4), 388–404. doi:10.1006/jecp.2000.2610.
Thierry, K. L., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Pipe, M. (2005). Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1125–1134. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1125.
Uhl, E. R., Wood, J. M., & Scullin, M. H. (2014). The effect of reinforcement on suggestibility among older children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Welch-Ross, M. (1995). Developmental changes in preschoolers’ ability to distinguish memories of performed, pretended, and imagined actions. Cognitive Development, 10(3), 421–441. doi:10.1016/0885-2014(95)90005-5.
White, T. L., Leichtman, M. D., & Ceci, S. J. (1997). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Accuracy, inaccuracy, and elaboration in preschoolers’ reports about a past event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, S37–S54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199712)11:7<S37::AID-ACP546>3.0.CO;2-4.
Wood, J. M., Nathan, D., Nezworski, M. T., & Uhl, E. (2009). Child sexual abuse investigations: Lessons learned from the McMartin and other daycare cases. In B. L. Bottoms, C. J. Najdowski, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Children as victims, witnesses, and offenders: Psychological science and the law (pp. 81–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duke, M.C., Uhl, E.R., Price, H., Wood, J.M. (2016). Avoiding Problems in Child Abuse Interviews and Investigations. In: O'Donohue, W., Fanetti, M. (eds) Forensic Interviews Regarding Child Sexual Abuse. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21097-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21097-1_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21096-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21097-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)