Abstract
Metaphors play a constitutive and mostly underestimated role in science in general, in the modern life sciences and bio-technologies in particular, and also in the accompanying ethical debates. The current discussion on synthetic biology can be seen as a prime example for the different ways metaphors enter into an area of conflict between science, technology, society and ethics. There seems to be a connection between the paradigm shift in the epistemological approach, the technological development, the societal discourse and the metaphors that have been used to describe, explain and argue the new field of synthetic biology and its revolutionary nature. The goal of my paper is to outline an analytical frame to determine and decipher the specific role and functions of metaphors in the intersection of science, technology and society. I aim to analyze and criticize the innovative, critical, and argumentative functions of metaphors of “life” in synthetic biology. This analytical frame will then be applied to the example of the metaphor of the genetic code which is the common reference point and driving force in a reconstructed story from Erwin Schrödinger to Craig Venter. This leads to a reassessment of synthetic biology between science and art and focusses on the obscuring and ideological dimension of metaphorical speech about the revolutionary nature of synthetic biology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed description of the Rathenau Institute’s initiatives to facilitate early engagement with synthetic biology, see Rerimassie (this volume).
- 2.
The following argument applies only to approaches which focus on DNA and are based on the differentiation of the somatic and the genetic level. Some areas of synthetic biology, such as bottom up protocell research, are not concerned with DNA. Although they work with computational methods and concepts, too, the metaphor of the genetic code script does not play a role for these research projects.
References
Arbib MA, Hesse MB (1986) The construction of reality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Aristotle, Bywater I, Murray G (1920) Aristotle on the art of poetry. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Balmer A, Martin P (2008) Synthetic biology: social and ethical challenges. Institute for Science and Society, University of Nottingham, England
Black M (1962) Models and metaphors. Studies in language and philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Blumenberg H (1986) Die Lesbarkeit der Welt. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M
Boldt J, Müller O (2008) Newtons of the leaves of grass. Nat Biotech 26(4):387–389. doi:10.1038/nbt0408-387
Boldt J, Müller O, Maio G (2009) Synthetische Biologie. Eine ethisch-philosophische Analyse. Beiträge zur Ethik und Biotechnologie, vol 5. Bundesamt für Bauten und Logistik BBL, Bern
Bölker M (2011) Revolution der Biologie? In: Dabrock P, Bölker M, Braun M, Ried J (eds) Was ist Leben - im Zeitalter seiner technischen Machbarkeit? Beiträge zur Ethik der Synthetsichen Biologie, 1st edn. Alber, K, Freiburg, München, pp 27–42
Bredekamp H, Rheinberger H (2012) Die neue Dimension des Unheimlichen. In: Köchy K, Hümpel A (eds) Synthetische Biologie. Entwicklung einer neuen Ingenieurbiologie? Themenband der interdisziplinären Arbeitsgruppe Gentechnologiebericht, Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, pp 162–163
Brukamp K (2011) Lebenswelten formen. Synthetische Biologie zwischen Molekularbiologie und Ingenieurtechnologie. In: Dabrock P, Bölker M, Braun M, Ried J (eds) Was ist Leben - im Zeitalter seiner technischen Machbarkeit? Beiträge zur Ethik der Synthetischen Biologie. Alber, Freiburg i. Br
Cserer A, Seiringer A (2009) Pictures of synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol 3(1–4):27–35. doi:10.1007/s11693-009-9038-3
de Lorenzo V, Danchin A (2008) Synthetic biology: discovering new worlds and new words. The new and not so new aspects of this emerging research field. EMBO Rep 9(9):822–827. doi:10.1038/embor.2008.159
de Vriend H, Walhout B, van Est R (2007) Constructing life—The world of synthetic biology. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Debatin B (1995) Die Rationalität der Metapher. Eine sprachphilosophische und kommunikationstheoretische Untersuchung. Dissertation, Technische Univ. Berlin
EGE (European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies to the European Commission) (2009) Ethics of synthetic biology. Opinion 25, Brüssel
Fauconnier G, Turner M (2002) The way we think. Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books, New York
Fischer EP, Mainzer K (eds) (1990) Die Frage nach dem Leben. Piper, München
Fröhlich G (1996) Netz-Euphorien. Zur Kritik digitaler und sozialer Netz(werk-)metaphern. In: Schramm A (ed) Philosophie in Österreich 1996. Graz, 28. Februar - 2. März 1996. Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien
Gibson DG, Glass JI, Lartigue C et al (2010) Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329(5987):52–56. doi:10.1126/science.1190719
ETC Group (2007) Extreme genetic engineering. An introduction to synthetic biology. www.etcgroup.org. Accessed 20 June 2015
Grunwald A (2008) Auf dem Weg in eine nanotechnologische Zukunft. Philosophisch-ethische Fragen, Orig.-Ausg. Angewandte Ethik, vol 10. Alber, Freiburg i. Br., München
Hesse MB (1970) Models and anologies in science, 2nd edn. Notre Dame University Press, Indiana
Hesse MB (1988) Die kognitiven Ansprüche der Metaphern. In: van Noppen JP (ed) Erinnern, um Neues zu sagen. Die Bedeutung der Metapher für die religiöse Sprache, Athenäum, Frankfurt am Main, pp 128–148
JCVI (J. Craig Venter Institute) (2010) First self-replicating, synthetic bacterial cell constructed by J. Craig Venter Institute Researchers. http://www.jcvi.org/cms/press/press-releases/full-text/article/first-self-replicating-synthetic-bacterial-cell-constructed-by-j-craig-venter-institute-researcher/home/. Accessed 11 May 2015
Kay LE (2000) Who wrote the book of life? A history of the genetic code. Writing science. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Keller EF (1996) Refiguring life. Metaphors of twentieth-century biology. Columbia University Press, New York
Keller EF (2002) The century of the gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Köchy K (2012) Philosophische Implikationen der Synthetischen Biologie. In: Köchy K, Hümpel A (eds) Synthetische Biologie. Entwicklung einer neuen Ingenieurbiologie? Themenband der interdisziplinären Arbeitsgruppe Gentechnologiebericht, Dornburg, pp 137–180
Kövecses Z (2010) Metaphor. A practical introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lakoff G, Johnson M (2003) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Merton RK (1968) Social theory and social structure. Free Press, New York
Mittelstraß J (2006) Taking it on trust. In: Ernst Schering Foundation (ed) Trust in Science—A dialogue with society. Berlin, pp 5–11
Moos T (2014) There is no such thing as artificial life. Notes on the ethics of synthetic biology. systembiologie.de (8):16–17
Özmen E (2012) Die normativen Grundlagen der Wissenschaftsfreiheit. In: Voigt F (ed) Freiheit der Wissenschaft. Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung, Normativität und Funktion. de Gruyter, Berlin, Boston
Pielenz M (1993) Argumentation und Metapher. Narr, Tübingen
Ricoeur P (1978a) The metaphorical process as cognition, imagination, and feeling. Critical Inquiry 5(1):143–159
Ricoeur P (1978b) The rule of metaphor. Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. Transl. by Robert Czerny with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Ried J, Braun M, Dabrock P (2011) Unbehagen und kulturelles Gedächtnis. Beobachtungen zur gesellschaftlichen Deutungsunsicherheit gegenüber Synthetischer Biologie. In: Dabrock P, Bölker M, Braun M, Ried J (eds) Was ist Leben - im Zeitalter seiner technischen Machbarkeit? Beiträge zur Ethik der Synthetischen Biologie. Freiburg i. Br, Alber, pp 345–369
Schrödinger E (2012) What is Life? With Mind and Matter and Autobiographical Sketches. Cambridge University Press (Canto Classics), New York
Seel M (1990) Am Beispiel der Metapher. Zum Verhältnis von buchstäblicher und figürlicher Rede. In: Forum für Philosophie Bad Homburg (ed) Intentionalität und Verstehen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a Main, pp 237–272
Vaihinger D (1997) Virtualität und Realität - Die Fiktionalisierung der Wirklichkeit und die unendliche Information. In: Krapp H, Wägenbauer T (eds) Künstliche Paradiese, virtuelle Realitäten. Künstliche Räume in Literatur-, Sozial- und Naturwissenschaften. Fink, München
Venter JC (2012) What is Life? A 21st century perspective. On the 70th Anniversary of Schroedinger’s Lecture at Trinity College by J. Craig Venter. http://edge.org/conversation/what-is-life. Accessed 05 Nov 2014
Wellmer A (2004) Sprachphilosophie. Eine Vorlesung, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Wellmer A (2007) Der Streit um die Wahrheit. Pragmatismus ohne regulative Ideen. In: Wellmer A (ed) Wie Worte Sinn machen. Aufsätze zur Sprachphilosophie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
Zimmer J (2003) Metapher, 2nd edn. Edition panta rei, vol 5. Transcript, Bielefeld
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Falkner, D. (2016). Metaphors of Life: Reflections on Metaphors in the Debate on Synthetic Biology. In: Hagen, K., Engelhard, M., Toepfer, G. (eds) Ambivalences of Creating Life. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21087-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21088-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)