Abstract
Synthetic biology is developing at rapid speed. On the one hand the field is expected to contribute to greening the economy, sustainable energy and public health, for example. On the other hand, synthetic biology brings about risks and also raises tough ethical and societal issues. In order to facilitate timely dialogue on how synthetic biology should develop and what conditions should be taken into account, several organizations involved in technology assessment started working on synthetic biology early on in its development. The Rathenau Instituut, based in the Netherlands, is one of these organizations. The following chapter will describe and reflect on initiatives of the institute to facilitate early engagement with synthetic biology. An analytical framework is used to better understand and distinguish these activities. Public engagement activities will be divided into three categories which relate to different spheres of the science and technology governance landscape: the political sphere, the science and technology sphere and the societal sphere. The analysis also distinguishes between informing and engaging activities. The chapter then demonstrates how interaction between the different spheres is facilitated by the Rathenau Instituut.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
One of the coordinators of the Rathenau Instituut.
- 2.
See for example the recent petition “Synthetic is not natural”, launched by a number of NGOs, including the ETC Group and Friends of the Earth, urging the company Ecover to ‘keep extreme genetic engineering out of “natural” products’ (ETC Group et al. 2014). This firm announced plans to shift from palm kernel oil to an algal oil as a basic ingredient for their soap products. To this end, the algae would be modified by means of synthetic biology. In contrast to the aforementioned NGOs, for Ecover the oil represents a ‘natural’ and sustainable alternative for the unsustainable palm kernel oil (Stemerding and Jochemsen 2014).
- 3.
For more information and examples see: www.rathenau.nl/SynBio. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.
References
Betten AW, Rerimassie V (2015) “Eindelijk iets dat wel betekenis heeft”. Over morele reflectie bij toekomstige synthetische biologen. Podium voor Bio-ethiek, 22 (1):18–20
BWM (2014) Synthetische biologie. Creatief met cellen. Cahier Biowetenschappen en Maatschappij 33(4):59–67
COGEM (2013) Synthetic biology update 2013. Anticipating developments in synthetic biology. COGEM, Bilthoven
De Vriend H (2006) Constructing life. Early social reflections on the emerging field of synthetic biology. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
De Vriend H, Van Est R, Walhout B (2007) Leven maken. Maatschappelijke reflectie op de opkomst van synthetische biologie. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
DWARS (2011) Visiestuk Synthetische Biologie. Een DWARSe visie op de toekomst van synthetische biologie, DWARS, Utrecht
ERASynBio (2014) Next steps for European synthetic biology: a strategic vision from ERASynBio. European research area network for the development and coordination of synthetic biology in Europe. European Commission, Brussels
ETC Group, Friends of the Earth, Organic Consumers Association et al (2014) Synthetic is not natural. Keep extreme genetic engineering out of “natural” products. http://www.syntheticisnotnatural.com/. Accessed 28 May 2015
European Commission (2010) Special Eurobarometer 340: Science and technology. European Commission, Brussels
Ganzevles J, van Est R, Nentwich M (2014) Embracing variety: introducing the inclusive modelling of (Parliamentary) technology assessment. J Responsible Innovation 1(3):292–313
Gibson D, Glass GI, Lartigue C et al (2010) Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329(5987):52–56
iGEM TU Delft (2010) Workshop on synthetic biology. http://2010.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft#page=Education/Workshop_on_synthetic_biology. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
iGEM (2011) Teams registered for iGEM 2011. http://igem.org/Team_List?year=2011. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
iGEM TU/e (2014) Introduction SYNENERGENE. http://2014.igem.org/Team:TU_Eindhoven/Synergene/Introduction. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
Kennislink (2014) Thema: synthetische biologie. http://www.kennislink.nl/thema/synthetische-biologie. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
Levidow L, Carr S (2010) GM food on trial. Testing European democracy. Routledge, London
Lucivero F (2012) Too good to be true? Appraising expectations for ethical technology assessment. Ph.D thesis, University of Twente
Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschap (1984) Beleidsnota integratie van wetenschap en technologie in de samenleving. Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschap, The Hague
NBV (2012) Chemistry of life. http://nbv.kncv.nl/chemistry-of-life-engineering-biology/parallel-session-8.127157.lynkx. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
NBV (2015) Biotech @Work. http://nbv.kncv.nl/biotech-a-work-2015.176259.lynkx. Accessed 13 Mar 2015
NEST High Level Expert Group (2005) Synthetic biology: applying engineering to biology. Report of a NEST High-Level Expert Group. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
OCW (2009) Instellingsbesluit Rathenau Instituut. Staatscourant, nr. 11024, 22 juli
Parliamentary Papers (2007) Annex to Papers of the Parliament of the Netherlands, Aanhangsel Handelingen II 2007/2008, nr. 2070800670. http://parlis.nl/kvr29998. Accessed 3 April 2015
Pauwels E (2013) Public Understanding of synthetic biology. Bioscience 63(2):79–89. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4
Rathenau Instituut (2014) Meeting of young minds 2012 http://www.rathenau.nl/themas/thema/project/synthetische-biologie/meeting-of-young-minds-2012.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
Rerimassie V, Stemerding D (2013) Politiek over leven: in debat over synthetische biologie. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Rerimassie V, Stemerding D (2014) SynBio politics: bringing synthetic biology into debate. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Rerimassie V, Stemerding D, Zhang W, Srinivas KR (2015) Discourses on synthetic biology in Europe, India and China. In: Ladikas M, Chaturvedi S, Zhao Y, Stemerding D (eds) Science and technology governance and ethics. A global perspective from Europe, India and China. Springer, Dordrecht
RIVM (2014a) Synthetische biologie http://www.rivm.nl/Onderwerpen/S/Synthetische_biologie. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
RIVM (2014b) Verslag debat Verantwoord omgaan met synthetische biologie. RIVM, Bilthoven
SB 3.0 (2007) Synthetic Biology 3.0 Conference Proceedings. ETH Zürich, Zürich
Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 54:251–268
Stemerding D (2014) iGEM as laboratory in responsible research and innovation. J Res Res Innovation 2(1):140–142
Stemerding D, Jochemsen H (2014) Niet natuurlijk? Cahier Biowetenschappen en Maatschappij 33(4):56–57
Stemerding D, Rerimassie V (2013) Discourses on synthetic biology in Europe. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Stemerding D, Van Est R (2013) Geen debat zonder publiek. Het opkomende debat over synthetische biologie ontleed. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Stemerding D, Rerimassie V, Messer P (2013) Het Bericht. Synthetische biologie vereist samenspraak. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Swierstra T, Boenink M, Walhout B, Van Est R (2009a) Leven als bouwpakket. Ethisch verkennen van een nieuwe technologische golf. Klement, Zoetermeer
Swierstra T, Van Est R, Boenink M (2009b) Taking care of the symbolic order. How converging technologies challenge our concepts. Nanoethics 3(3):269–280
Synenergene (2014) What is Synenergene? http://synenergene.eu/information/what-synenergene. Accessed 14 Dec 2014
Van Est R (2013) Political TA: opening up the political debate. Stimulating early engagement of parliamentarians and policy makers on emerging technologies—Attempts by the Rathenau Instituut. In: Doorn N, Schuurbiers D, van de Poel I et al (eds) Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–153
Van Est R, Stemerding D (2012) European governance challenges in 21st century bio-engineering. European Parliament, Brussels
Van Est R, De Vriend H, Walhout B (eds) (2007) Bericht aan het Parlement. Synthetische biologie: nieuw leven in het biodebat. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague
Van Est R, Walhout B, Rerimassie V, Stemerding D, Hanssen L (2012) Governance of nanotechnology in the Netherlands: informing and engaging in different social spheres. Int J Emerg Technol Soc (iJETS) 10:6–26
Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Heintz M, Bessant J (eds) Responsible innovation. Wiley, London, pp 51–74
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Dirk Stemerding, Rinie van Est, Marieke Ruitenburg, Pol Maclaine Pont and the organizers and participants of the TA summer school ‘Analyzing the Societal Dimensions of Synthetic Biology’ for informing and engaging with me on the content and structure of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rerimassie, V. (2016). Early Engagement with Synthetic Biology in the Netherlands—Initiatives by the Rathenau Instituut. In: Hagen, K., Engelhard, M., Toepfer, G. (eds) Ambivalences of Creating Life. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21087-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21088-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)