Skip to main content

Early Engagement with Synthetic Biology in the Netherlands—Initiatives by the Rathenau Instituut

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ambivalences of Creating Life

Part of the book series: Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment ((ETHICSSCI,volume 45))

Abstract

Synthetic biology is developing at rapid speed. On the one hand the field is expected to contribute to greening the economy, sustainable energy and public health, for example. On the other hand, synthetic biology brings about risks and also raises tough ethical and societal issues. In order to facilitate timely dialogue on how synthetic biology should develop and what conditions should be taken into account, several organizations involved in technology assessment started working on synthetic biology early on in its development. The Rathenau Instituut, based in the Netherlands, is one of these organizations. The following chapter will describe and reflect on initiatives of the institute to facilitate early engagement with synthetic biology. An analytical framework is used to better understand and distinguish these activities. Public engagement activities will be divided into three categories which relate to different spheres of the science and technology governance landscape: the political sphere, the science and technology sphere and the societal sphere. The analysis also distinguishes between informing and engaging activities. The chapter then demonstrates how interaction between the different spheres is facilitated by the Rathenau Instituut.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    One of the coordinators of the Rathenau Instituut.

  2. 2.

    See for example the recent petition “Synthetic is not natural”, launched by a number of NGOs, including the ETC Group and Friends of the Earth, urging the company Ecover to ‘keep extreme genetic engineering out of “natural” products’ (ETC Group et al. 2014). This firm announced plans to shift from palm kernel oil to an algal oil as a basic ingredient for their soap products. To this end, the algae would be modified by means of synthetic biology. In contrast to the aforementioned NGOs, for Ecover the oil represents a ‘natural’ and sustainable alternative for the unsustainable palm kernel oil (Stemerding and Jochemsen 2014).

  3. 3.

    For more information and examples see: www.rathenau.nl/SynBio. Accessed 14 Dec 2014.

References

  • Betten AW, Rerimassie V (2015) “Eindelijk iets dat wel betekenis heeft”. Over morele reflectie bij toekomstige synthetische biologen. Podium voor Bio-ethiek, 22 (1):18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • BWM (2014) Synthetische biologie. Creatief met cellen. Cahier Biowetenschappen en Maatschappij 33(4):59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • COGEM (2013) Synthetic biology update 2013. Anticipating developments in synthetic biology. COGEM, Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vriend H (2006) Constructing life. Early social reflections on the emerging field of synthetic biology. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vriend H, Van Est R, Walhout B (2007) Leven maken. Maatschappelijke reflectie op de opkomst van synthetische biologie. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • DWARS (2011) Visiestuk Synthetische Biologie. Een DWARSe visie op de toekomst van synthetische biologie, DWARS, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • ERASynBio (2014) Next steps for European synthetic biology: a strategic vision from ERASynBio. European research area network for the development and coordination of synthetic biology in Europe. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • ETC Group, Friends of the Earth, Organic Consumers Association et al (2014) Synthetic is not natural. Keep extreme genetic engineering out of “natural” products. http://www.syntheticisnotnatural.com/. Accessed 28 May 2015

  • European Commission (2010) Special Eurobarometer 340: Science and technology. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganzevles J, van Est R, Nentwich M (2014) Embracing variety: introducing the inclusive modelling of (Parliamentary) technology assessment. J Responsible Innovation 1(3):292–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson D, Glass GI, Lartigue C et al (2010) Creation of a bacterial cell controlled by a chemically synthesized genome. Science 329(5987):52–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • iGEM TU Delft (2010) Workshop on synthetic biology. http://2010.igem.org/Team:TU_Delft#page=Education/Workshop_on_synthetic_biology. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • iGEM (2011) Teams registered for iGEM 2011. http://igem.org/Team_List?year=2011. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • iGEM TU/e (2014) Introduction SYNENERGENE. http://2014.igem.org/Team:TU_Eindhoven/Synergene/Introduction. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • Kennislink (2014) Thema: synthetische biologie. http://www.kennislink.nl/thema/synthetische-biologie. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • Levidow L, Carr S (2010) GM food on trial. Testing European democracy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucivero F (2012) Too good to be true? Appraising expectations for ethical technology assessment. Ph.D thesis, University of Twente

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschap (1984) Beleidsnota integratie van wetenschap en technologie in de samenleving. Ministerie van Onderwijs en Wetenschap, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • NBV (2012) Chemistry of life. http://nbv.kncv.nl/chemistry-of-life-engineering-biology/parallel-session-8.127157.lynkx. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • NBV (2015) Biotech @Work. http://nbv.kncv.nl/biotech-a-work-2015.176259.lynkx. Accessed 13 Mar 2015

  • NEST High Level Expert Group (2005) Synthetic biology: applying engineering to biology. Report of a NEST High-Level Expert Group. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • OCW (2009) Instellingsbesluit Rathenau Instituut. Staatscourant, nr. 11024, 22 juli

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliamentary Papers (2007) Annex to Papers of the Parliament of the Netherlands, Aanhangsel Handelingen II 2007/2008, nr. 2070800670. http://parlis.nl/kvr29998. Accessed 3 April 2015

  • Pauwels E (2013) Public Understanding of synthetic biology. Bioscience 63(2):79–89. doi:10.1525/bio.2013.63.2.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathenau Instituut (2014) Meeting of young minds 2012 http://www.rathenau.nl/themas/thema/project/synthetische-biologie/meeting-of-young-minds-2012.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • Rerimassie V, Stemerding D (2013) Politiek over leven: in debat over synthetische biologie. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Rerimassie V, Stemerding D (2014) SynBio politics: bringing synthetic biology into debate. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Rerimassie V, Stemerding D, Zhang W, Srinivas KR (2015) Discourses on synthetic biology in Europe, India and China. In: Ladikas M, Chaturvedi S, Zhao Y, Stemerding D (eds) Science and technology governance and ethics. A global perspective from Europe, India and China. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • RIVM (2014a) Synthetische biologie http://www.rivm.nl/Onderwerpen/S/Synthetische_biologie. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • RIVM (2014b) Verslag debat Verantwoord omgaan met synthetische biologie. RIVM, Bilthoven

    Google Scholar 

  • SB 3.0 (2007) Synthetic Biology 3.0 Conference Proceedings. ETH Zürich, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Schot J, Rip A (1997) The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 54:251–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemerding D (2014) iGEM as laboratory in responsible research and innovation. J Res Res Innovation 2(1):140–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemerding D, Jochemsen H (2014) Niet natuurlijk? Cahier Biowetenschappen en Maatschappij 33(4):56–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemerding D, Rerimassie V (2013) Discourses on synthetic biology in Europe. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemerding D, Van Est R (2013) Geen debat zonder publiek. Het opkomende debat over synthetische biologie ontleed. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemerding D, Rerimassie V, Messer P (2013) Het Bericht. Synthetische biologie vereist samenspraak. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra T, Boenink M, Walhout B, Van Est R (2009a) Leven als bouwpakket. Ethisch verkennen van een nieuwe technologische golf. Klement, Zoetermeer

    Google Scholar 

  • Swierstra T, Van Est R, Boenink M (2009b) Taking care of the symbolic order. How converging technologies challenge our concepts. Nanoethics 3(3):269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synenergene (2014) What is Synenergene? http://synenergene.eu/information/what-synenergene. Accessed 14 Dec 2014

  • Van Est R (2013) Political TA: opening up the political debate. Stimulating early engagement of parliamentarians and policy makers on emerging technologies—Attempts by the Rathenau Instituut. In: Doorn N, Schuurbiers D, van de Poel I et al (eds) Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory, Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Est R, Stemerding D (2012) European governance challenges in 21st century bio-engineering. European Parliament, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Est R, De Vriend H, Walhout B (eds) (2007) Bericht aan het Parlement. Synthetische biologie: nieuw leven in het biodebat. Rathenau Instituut, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Est R, Walhout B, Rerimassie V, Stemerding D, Hanssen L (2012) Governance of nanotechnology in the Netherlands: informing and engaging in different social spheres. Int J Emerg Technol Soc (iJETS) 10:6–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Schomberg R (2013) A vision of responsible innovation. In: Owen R, Heintz M, Bessant J (eds) Responsible innovation. Wiley, London, pp 51–74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dirk Stemerding, Rinie van Est, Marieke Ruitenburg, Pol Maclaine Pont and the organizers and participants of the TA summer school ‘Analyzing the Societal Dimensions of Synthetic Biology’ for informing and engaging with me on the content and structure of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Virgil Rerimassie .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rerimassie, V. (2016). Early Engagement with Synthetic Biology in the Netherlands—Initiatives by the Rathenau Instituut. In: Hagen, K., Engelhard, M., Toepfer, G. (eds) Ambivalences of Creating Life. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21088-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-21087-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-21088-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics