Skip to main content

Seeking a Feminist Pedagogy for Children’s Dance (1998, Revised)

  • Chapter
Embodied Curriculum Theory and Research in Arts Education

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 17))

Abstract

The author narrates her own journey of becoming, and continuing to become, a dance educator and a feminist, weaving in theory which illuminates the changes in her thinking over time. In the discussion of multiple versions of feminism, she places herself in a category of socialist feminism. At the same time, she notes that deciding on basic positions of belief and value doesn’t necessarily offer clear guidance for personal and professional decision-making, because “most of us have a great deal of inconsistency between what we say we believe and what we do, a conflict we are able to maintain only by not thinking about it too much.” Engaging in a reflective process brings these conflicts to the forefront, the painful process that is necessary to generate growth. To that end, the author critically examines several approaches to teaching dance (traditional dance pedagogy, critical pedagogy, and gender models for pedagogy/creative dance), and their relationship to feminist pedagogies. She then describes and critiques her own developing vision, identifying three key points related to feminist pedagogies:

  • Finding one’s own voice and inner authority,

  • Cultivating awareness of relationship (with others in class, with one’s own body, between self and world), and

  • Responsibility and power for change.

She concludes with the acknowledgement that her goal is not to persuade her students or others to teach as she does, but for educators to engage in ongoing reflection about what they believe and why, and about the consequences of choices they make as persons and as educators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alter, J. (1986). A field study of an advanced dance class in a private studio setting. Dance Studies, 10, 49–97. Published by Center for Dance Studies, Les Bois, St. Peter, Jersey, Channel Islands, Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anijar, K. (1992). Listening in liberty. Paper presented to the International Human Science Research Conference, Oakland, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (1984). Teaching and “women’s work”: A comparative historical and ideological analysis. In E. B. Gumbert (Ed.), Expressions of power in education: Studies of class, gender and race (pp. 29–49). Atlanta: Center for Cross-cultural Education, Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberg, N. R., & Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J. (1982). The unmaking of a dancer: An unconventional life. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1955). Between man and man (M. Friedman, Trans.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou (2nd ed.) (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1970). Experience and education: Traditional vs. progressive education. In J. W. Noll & S. P. Kelly (Eds.), Foundations of education in America: An anthology of major thoughts and significant actions (pp. 340–344). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellsworth, E. (1992). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 90–119). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1983). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P., & Macedo, D. (1987). Literacy: Reading the word and the world. South Hadley: Bergin & Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedan, B. (1963). The feminine mystique. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froebel, F. (1970). The education of man: The law of self activity. In J. W. Noll & S. P. Kelly (Eds.), Foundations of education in America: An anthology of major thoughts and significant actions (pp. 196–199). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. (1991). Modernism, postmodernism, and feminism: Rethinking the boundaries of educational discourse. In H. Giroux (Ed.), Postmodernism, feminism and cultural politics: Redrawing educational boundaries (pp. 1–59). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, S. (1983). Off-balance: The real world of ballet. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1973). Teacher as stranger. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grumet, M. R. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • H’Doubler, M. N. (1977). Dance: A creative art experience. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, S. (1988). The teaching of ballet. Writings on Dance, 3(Winter), 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. M. (1983). Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa: Rowman & Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J., & Modra, H. (1992). Feminist pedagogy and emancipatory possibilities. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 138–166). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, G., with Lawrence, G. (1986). Dancing on my grave. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. B. (1977). Value bases and issues for curriculum. In A. Molnar & J. Zahorik (Eds.), Curriculum theory (pp. 10–21). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, F. A. (1987). Toward a richer theory of feminist pedagogy: A comparison of “liberation” and “gender” models for teaching and learning. Journal of Education, 169(3), 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, I. A. (1995). A partnership toward art in education: Approaching a relationship between theory and practice. Impulse: The International Journal of Dance Science, Medicine, and Education, 3(2), 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, I. A. (1997). Context-based dance education. In E. Anttila (Ed.), The 7th International Dance and the Child Conference Proceedings. Kuopio: daCi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, I. A. (1998). Dance education in/and the postmodern. In S. Shapiro (Ed.), Dance, power, and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives in dance education (pp. 171–185). Champaign: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. L. (1985, April). Body metaphors and dance instruction. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, Cincinnati.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, R. A. (1981). A statement of belief. In G. Fleming (Ed.). Children’s dance (rev. ed.) (pp. 5–22). Reston: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orner, M. (1992). Interrupting the calls for the student voice in “liberatory” education: A feminist poststructuralist perspective. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 74–89). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestalozzi, J. H. (1970). How Gertrude teaches her children and the method. In J. W. Noll & S. P. Kelly (Eds.), Foundations of education in America: An anthology of major thoughts and significant actions (pp. 189–195). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinar, W. (1988). “Whole, bright, deep with understanding”: Issues in qualitative research and autobiographical method. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Contemporary curriculum discourses (pp. 134–153). Scottsdale: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S. B. (1996). Toward transformative teachers: Critical and feminist perspectives in dance education. Impulse: The International Journal of Dance Science, Medicine, and Education, 4(1), 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrewsbury, C. (1987). What is feminist pedagogy? Women’s Studies Quarterly, XV(3&4), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1984). Reflections and visions: A hermeneutic study of dangers and possibilities in dance education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of North Carolina, Greensboro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1985). Piaget for dance educators: A theoretical study. Dance Research Journal, 17(1), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1992). Reflections on student experience in dance education. Design for Arts in Education, 93(5), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1993a). Journey toward a feminist pedagogy for dance. Women in Performance, 6(1), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1993b). Meaning and value: Reflecting on what students say about school. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 8(3), 216–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W. (1993c). A place called dance in school: Reflecting on what the students say. Impulse: The International Journal for Dance Science, Medicine, and Education, 1(2), 90–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinson, S. W., Blumenfeld-Jones, D., & Van Dyke, J. (1990). Voices of young women dance students: An interpretive study of meaning in dance. Dance Research Journal, 22(2), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, V. (1981). Thoughts on the creative process. In N. McCaslin (Ed.), Children and drama (2nd ed., pp. 30–47). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, J. E. (1992). Modern dance in a postmodern world: An analysis of federal arts funding and its impact on the field of modern dance. Reston: National Dance Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, L. M. (1979). Competing with the sylph: Dancers and the pursuit of the ideal body form. Kansas City: Andrews & McMeel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1992). Progressive pedagogy and political struggle. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy (pp. 15–24). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stinson, S.W. (2016). Seeking a Feminist Pedagogy for Children’s Dance (1998, Revised). In: Embodied Curriculum Theory and Research in Arts Education. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20786-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20786-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20785-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20786-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics