Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education ((LAAE,volume 17))

  • 983 Accesses

Abstract

Beginning with a desire to develop an aesthetic model for curriculum and teaching in the arts, the author was challenged by an awakening of her moral concerns within arts education. First considering multiple sources who found a connection between morality and art or the aesthetic dimension, she finds limitations to each of their arguments, realizing further exploration of both the moral dimension and the aesthetic dimension was called for. The work of Martin Buber, Carol Gilligan, and James Macdonald is used to illuminate the significance of relationship as central to understanding the moral dimension. In probing the significance of relationship to the aesthetic dimension, the author identifies three particular views of relationship in art, each with quite different implications when applied to curriculum. Finding moral limitations to the first two (the objectivist approach emphasizing relationships within the work of art, and a second emphasizing relationship between the perceiver and the art work), the author proposes a third. An emphasis on the relationship between the perceiver and the larger world, with the aesthetic object as the lens through which we see/make sense of the reality of being a person-in-the-world, is suggested as the only kind of aesthetic model which sufficiently responds to moral concerns in curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beardsley, M. C. (1958). Aesthetics: Problems in the philosophy of criticism. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1955). Between man and man (M. Friedman, Trans.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou (2nd ed.) (R. G. Smith, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Minton Balch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, E. W. (1979). The educational imagination. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, E. (1969). The body is a clear place. In M. Gray (Ed.), Focus on dance V: Composition (pp. 34–39). Washington, DC: American Association for Health, Physical Education & Recreation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, J. (1978). Aesthetic experience and moral education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 12(3), 13–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. B. (1974). A transcendental developmental ideology of education. In W. Pinar (Ed.), Heightened consciousness, cultural revolution, and curriculum theory (pp. 85–116). Berkeley: McCutchan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. B. (1977). Value bases and issues for curriculum. In A. Molnar & J. Zahorik (Eds.), Curriculum theory (pp. 10–21). Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. B., & Purpel, D. E. (1983). Curriculum planning: Visions and metaphors. In Z. Lamm (Ed.), New trends in education. Tel Aviv: Yachdar United.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, H. (1978). The aesthetic dimension: Toward a critique of Marxist aesthetics. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A. J. (1980). Aesthetic sensitizing and moral education. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 14(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfern, B. (1983). Dance, art and aesthetics. London: Dance Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M. (1981). You are the music. In M. Ross (Ed.), The aesthetic imperative: Relevance and responsibility in arts education (pp. 147–172). Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stinson, S.W. (2016). Curriculum and the Morality of Aesthetics (1985). In: Embodied Curriculum Theory and Research in Arts Education. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20786-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20786-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20785-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20786-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics