Skip to main content

Decision-Making and Planning Framework to Improve the Deployment Success of Decentralized Rural Electrification in India

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Access to Energy in the Global South
  • 1053 Accesses

Abstract

300 million people in India lack access to electricity. More than 90 % of them live in rural areas. The low electrification rate of around 55 % among rural households and the lack of electrification infrastructure in remote areas are major challenges. Decentralized rural electrification has emerged as an alternative approach to electrifying remote rural areas; but an increasing number of commissioned projects are failing to stand the test of time. The present research identifies what factors were crucial in successfully translating off-grid technologies into sustainable solutions. The findings indicate that in addition to appropriate technology adoption, the success of decentralized rural electrification depends on proper management of socioeconomic, operational, environmental, and economic challenges. This includes adequate needs assessment, awareness raising, tariff sensitivity to socioeconomic conditions, demand management, capacity building, access to patient capital, a high capacity utilization level, and sensitivity toward the local environment. The transition from few success stories to scaling up calls for standardizing the planning approach while customizing the solutions. Based on these findings, we developed a multi-tier decision-making framework to assist the planning and management of decentralized rural electrification and enhance the sustainability of projects. The framework systematically captures the complexity of factors that need to be considered for effective decision-making and planning of decentralized rural electrification. We anticipate that implementation of the proposed framework will improve the success rate of projects, enabling decentralized rural electrification to be scaled-up as a sustainable electrification solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Under the XI Plan (2007–2012), the Government of India allocated 265 billion INR (4.4 billion USD) to RGGVY. Out of this, only 5.4 billion INR (90 million USD) were allocated to a DRE scheme called DDG. Similarly, under the XII and XIII plans, 354 billion INR were allocated to RGGVY, including only 9 billion INR for DDG.

References

  • Ballesteros, A., Norford, E., Nagle, T., Yonavjak, L., & Alzner, S. (2012). Implementation strategies for renewable energy services in low-income, rural areas. Washington, D.C.: World Resource Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkat, A., Khan, S., Rahman, M., & Zaman, S. (2002). Economic and social impact evaluation study of the rural electrification program in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Human Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastakoti, B. P. (2006). The electricity-livelihood nexus: Some highlights from the Andhikhola Hydroelectric and Rural Electrification Centre (AHREC). Energy for Sustainable Development, 10(3), 26–35. doi:10.1016/S0973-0826(08)60541-4

  • Bhattacharyya, S. C. (2012). Review of alternative methodologies for analysing off-grid electricity supply. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 677–694. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.033

  • Chakrabarti, S., & Chakrabarti, S. (2002). Rural electrification programme with solar energy in remote region—a case study in an island. Energy Policy, 30(1), 33–42. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(01)00057-X

  • Department for International Development [DfID]. (2002). Energy for the poor: Underpinning the millennium development goals. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ete, M., & Prochaska, F. (2009). Determinants of success and failure of community based micro hydro project. In Proceedings of the Seminar—Energy and Climate Change in Cold Regions of Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambhir, A., Toro, V., & Ganapathy, M. (2012). Decentralised renewable energy (DRE) micro-grids in India—a review of recent literatue. Pune: Prayas Energy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grameen Shakti. (2012). Grameen Shakti makes a world record in non-grid power generation. http://gshakti.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=54&Itemid=78. Accessed 3 March 2014.

  • International Energy Agency [IEA]. (2012). World energy outlook. Paris: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. (2013). Development of decision analysis framework to assist decentralized electrification in rural India. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmler, A. (2006). Regional disparities in electrification of India—do geographic factors matter? Zurich: Centre for Energy Policy and Economics (CEPE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnaswamy, S. (2010). Shifting of goal posts—rural electrification in India: A progress report. Bangalore: Vasudha Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A., Mohanty, P., Palit, D., & Chaurey, A. (2009). Approach for standardization of off-grid electrification projects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(8), 1946–1956. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.03.008

  • Mehta, C., & Mehta, K. (2011). A design space and business strategy exploration tool for infrastructure-based ventures in developing communities. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, 6(2), 30–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palit, D. (2003). Renewable energy in Northeast India: Issues and prospects. In P. Upender & M. P. Poonia (Eds.), Energy technologies for sustainable development (pp. 85–93). Ghaziabad: Prime Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palit, D., & Chaurey, A. (2011). Off-grid rural electrification experiences from South Asia: Status and best practices. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(3), 266–276. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2011.07.004

  • Palit, D., & Hazarika, N. (2002). Performance and impact of solar photovoltaic devices disseminated for village electrification in Northeast India. In A. K. M. Sadrul Islam & D. G. Infield (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Renewable Energy for Rural Development, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka (pp. 13–18).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palit, D., Sovacool, B. K., Cooper, C., Zoppo, D., Eidsness, J., Crafton, M., et al. (2013). The trials and tribulations of the Village Energy Security Programme (VESP) in India. Energy Policy, 57, 407–417. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.02.006

  • Pareek, L., & Ladakh Ecological Development Group. (2007). A study on micro hydro units in Ladakh to analyse their feasibility using quantitative & qualitative tools, institutional arrangements, and costing methods (First). Dehra Dun: Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokhrel, A. K., Bates, M. N., Verma, S. C., Joshi, H. S., Sreeramareddy, C. T., & Smith, K. R. (2010). Tuberculosis and indoor biomass and kerosene use in Nepal: A case-control study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(4), 558–564. doi:10.1289/ehp.0901032

  • REC India. (2014). Status of sanctioned DDG projects. Rural Electrification Corporation. http://www.recindia.nic.in/download/DDG_MIS%2031.01.2014%20.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2014.

  • Rolland, S., & Giana, G. (2011). Hybrid mini-grids for rural electrification: Lessons learned. Brussels: Alliance for Rural Electrification.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEVEA. (2013). Case study: Husk power system—power to empower. Les marches, France: Synergie pour l’Echange et la Valorisation des Entrepreneurs d’Avenir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Drupady, I. M. (2011). Summoning earth and fire: The energy development implications of Grameen Shakti (GS) in Bangladesh. Energy, 36(7), 4445–4459. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.077

  • Sovacool, B. K., & Drupady, I. M. (2012). Energy access, poverty, and development: The Governance of small-scale renewable energy in developing Asia (p. 306). New York: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748

  • United Nations Development Programme [UNDP]. (2005). Energizing the millennium development goals. A guide to energy’s role in reducing poverty. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP-APRC. (2012). Energy to move rural Nepal out of poverty: The rural energy development programme model in Nepal. Bangkok: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). Designing sustainable off-grid rural electrification projects: Principles and practices. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhishek Jain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jain, A., Kattuman, P. (2015). Decision-Making and Planning Framework to Improve the Deployment Success of Decentralized Rural Electrification in India. In: Hostettler, S., Gadgil, A., Hazboun, E. (eds) Sustainable Access to Energy in the Global South. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20209-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20209-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20208-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20209-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics