Skip to main content

Overview of the \(H\rightarrow \textit{WW}\) Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discovery and Measurement of the Higgs Boson in the WW Decay Channel

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 345 Accesses

Abstract

The \(WW\) decay of the Higgs boson is a promising search channel as it has a large branching ratio (BR) for a wide range of \(m_H\). In fact, it is the most probable decay for \(m_H > 135\) GeV (see Fig. 1.5). This chapter will describe the experimental search for \(gg\rightarrow H \rightarrow WW \rightarrow \ell \nu \ell \nu \) (where \(\ell = { e}, \mu \)) using the 2012 dataset of \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = 8\)  TeV. The search strategy is optimised for a low mass Higgs boson, as favoured by electroweak fits, and thus accounts for off-shell \(W\) bosons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Events with one or two \(W \rightarrow \tau \nu \) decays can contribute to the dileptonic search when the \(\tau \) decays to an electron or muon. This contribution is small however, since \(\text {BR}({\tau \rightarrow \ell \nu _{\ell }\nu _{\tau }}) = 17.6\,\%\) [1]. Also, the kinematics of such events are different due to the additional decay(s) and neutrinos.

  2. 2.

    Each SCT module comprises two layers of silicon strips with a small stereo angle, enabling the three-dimensional coordinate to be precisely measured (see Sect. 3.3.1).

  3. 3.

    A variety of muon reconstruction strategies are available: stand-alone muons have only MS tracks, combined muons have both MS and ID tracks, segment-tagged muons have ID tracks that match to an MS track segment, and calorimeter-tagged muons have ID tracks matched to the calorimeter deposit of a minimum ionising particle (used to recover efficiency at \(\eta \approx 0\), where detector services reduce the MS coverage). This thesis uses combined muons, which offer the best performance.

  4. 4.

    Significant hadronic shower energy is lost through slow neutrons, nuclear excitations and neutrinos.

  5. 5.

    ATLAS good runs list:

    figure b
    figure c

    .

  6. 6.

    A prescaled trigger reduces the threshold \(p_{\mathrm{T}}\) by recording only 1 in N events passing the trigger, and weighting such events by a factor N. In doing so, statistical power is lost.

  7. 7.

    It follows that events featuring an electron with \(p_{\mathrm{T}} < 15\) GeV must fire a single-lepton trigger, and thus the leading lepton must have \(p_{\mathrm{T}} > 25\) GeV.

References

  1. Particle Data Group, Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D86, 010001 (2012), and 2013 partial update for the 2014 edn

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Cornelissen et al., The new ATLAS track reconstruction (NEWT). J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119, 032014 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. ATLAS Collaboration, Expected Performance of the ATLAS Experiment - Detector, Trigger and Physics, CERN-OPEN-2008-020 (2008), arXiv:0901.0512 [hep-ex]

  4. G. Piacquadio, K. Prokofiev, A. Wildauer, Primary vertex reconstruction in the ATLAS experiment at LHC. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 119, 032033 (2008)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Bouhova-Thacker et al., Expected Performance of Vertex Reconstruction in the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 57, 760 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. ATLAS Collaboration, Expected electron performance in the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-006 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ATLAS Collaboration, Improved electron reconstruction in ATLAS using the Gaussian Sum Filter-based model for bremsstrahlung, ATLAS-CONF-2012-047 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. ATLAS Collaboration, Electron performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2010 LHC proton-proton collision data, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1909 (2012), arXiv:1110.3174 [hep-ex]

  9. S. Laplace, J. de Vivie, Calorimeter isolation and pile-up. ATL-COM-PHYS-2012-467 (2012). (ATLAS internal)

    Google Scholar 

  10. ATLAS Collaboration, Electron Efficiency Measurements for 2012 and 2011 Data. ATL-COM-PHYS-2013-1287 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Nicolaidou et al., Muon identification procedure for the ATLAS detector at the LHC using Muonboy reconstruction package and tests of its performance using cosmic rays and single beam data. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 219, 032052 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. ATLAS Collaboration, Preliminary results on the muon reconstruction efficiency, momentum resolution, and momentum scale in ATLAS 2012 pp collision data. ATLAS-CONF-2013-088 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy measurement with the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2304 (2013), arXiv:1112.6426 [hep-ex]

  14. ATLAS Collaboration, Jet energy scale and its systematic uncertainty in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=7\) TeV with ATLAS 2011 data, ATLAS-CONF-2013-004 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. ATLAS Collaboration, Pile-up subtraction and suppression for jets in ATLAS, ATLAS-CONF-2013-083 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ATLAS Collaboration (2014), https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/JetEtmissApproved2013JESUncertainty. Accessed 21 May 2014

  17. ATLAS Collaboration, Selection of jets produced in proton-proton collisions with the ATLAS detector using 2011 data, ATLAS-CONF-2012-020 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ATLAS Collaboration, Commissioning of the ATLAS high-performance \(b\)-tagging algorithms in the 7 TeV collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2011-102 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. ATLAS Collaboration, Calibration of \(b\)-tagging using dileptonic top pair events in a combinatorial likelihood approach with the ATLAS experiment, ATLAS-CONF-2014-004 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of missing transverse momentum reconstruction in ATLAS studied in proton-proton collisions recorded in 2012 at 8 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2013-082 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ATLAS Collaboration, Measurements of the photon identification efficiency with the ATLAS detector using 4.9 fb\(^{-1}\) of pp collision data collected in 2011, ATLAS-CONF-2012-123 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ATLAS Collaboration, Determination of the tau energy scale and the associated systematic uncertainty in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}=8\) TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC in 2012, ATLAS-CONF-2013-044 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ATLAS Collaboration, https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/MuonTriggerPublicResults. Accessed 21 May 2014

  24. R.K. Ellis, I. Hinchliffe, M. Soldate, J.J. Van Der Bij, Higgs decay to \(\tau ^+\tau ^-\): a possible signature of intermediate mass Higgs bosons at high energy hadron colliders. Nucl. Phys. B 297, 221 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  25. A. Hoecker et al., TMVA: toolkit for multivariate data analysis. PoS ACAT, 040 (2007), arXiv:physics/0703039

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hall .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, D. (2015). Overview of the \(H\rightarrow \textit{WW}\) Analysis. In: Discovery and Measurement of the Higgs Boson in the WW Decay Channel. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19989-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics