Skip to main content

Complications in Biliary Surgery: Tips and Tricks

  • Chapter
Complications in Laparoscopic Surgery

Abstract

Despite all “calls for attention” and many papers published alerting to the importance and high rates of iatrogenic lesions of the biliary tract, these lesions continue to happen, with unreasonable frequency.

This chapter approaches the incidences reported and the possible causes for it and presents “tips” on how to have it minimised. These “tips” go to present some technical details that may be of importance for all those who perform, regularly this kind of surgery. As the other chapters, some video clips showing examples of the problems are attached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Morgenstern L, Berci G (1992) Twelve hundred open cholecystectomies before the laparoscopic era a standard for comparison leon. Arch Surg 127(4):400–403

    Google Scholar 

  2. Castelo B et al (1998) Portug Soc Surg. Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chapman WC et al (1995) Postcholecystectomy bile duct strictures. Management and outcome in 130 patients. Arch Surg 130(6):597–602; discussion 602–604

    Google Scholar 

  4. Maetani Y, Itoh K et al (1998) Portal vein anomaly associated with deviation of the ligamentum teres to the right and malposition of the gallbladder. Radiology 207(3):723–728

    Google Scholar 

  5. Voitk AJ, Tsao SG et al (2001) The tail of the learning curve for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 182(3):250–253

    Google Scholar 

  6. Morgenstern L. McGrath MF et al (1995) Continuing hazards of the learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 61(10):914–918

    Google Scholar 

  7. Calvete J, Sabater L et al (2000) Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: myth or reality of the learning curve? Surg Endosc 14(7):608–611

    Google Scholar 

  8. Way LW et al (2003) Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective. Ann Surg 237(4):460–469

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fullum TM et al (2013) Is Laparoscopy a Risk Factor for Bile Duct Injury During Cholecystectomy?. JSLS 17(3):365–370

    Google Scholar 

  10. Buddingh KT et al (2012) Documenting correct assessment of biliary anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 26(1):79–85

    Google Scholar 

  11. McPartland KJ, Pomposelli JJ (2008) Iatrogenic biliary injuries: classification, identification, and management. Surg Clin North Am 88(6):1329–1343; ix. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2008.07.006

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nuzzo G (2009) Treatment of biliary lesions due to cholecystectomy. Chir Ital 61(5–6):519–521

    Google Scholar 

  13. Slim K, Martin G (2013) Does routine intra-operative cholangiography reduce the risk of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? An evidence-based approach. J Visc Surg 150(5):321–324

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter JG (1991) Avoidance of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 162(1):71–76

    Google Scholar 

  15. Strasberg SM, Hertl M et al (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101–125

    Google Scholar 

  16. Buddingh TK et al (2011) Intraoperative assessment of biliary anatomy for prevention of bile duct injury: a review of current and future patient safety interventions. Surg Endosc 25:2449–2461

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rawlings A et al (2010) Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Initial Experience with Critical View of Safety Dissection and Routine Intraoperative Cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 211(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Strasberg SM (2013) A teaching program for the “culture of safety in cholecystectomy” and avoidance of bile duct injury. J Am Coll Surg 217(4):751

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davidoff AM, Pappas TN et al (1992) Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 215(3):196–202

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davidoff AM, Branum GD et al (1993) Clinical features and mechanisms of major laparoscopic biliary injury. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 14(5):338–345

    Google Scholar 

  21. Richardson MC, Bell G et al (1996) Incidence and nature of bile duct injuries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 5913 cases. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group. Br J Surg 83(10):1356–1360

    Google Scholar 

  22. McMahon AJ, Baxter JN et al (1993) Preventing complications of laparoscopy. Br J Surg 80(12):1593–1594

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Schiappa MD, FACS, PhD (Hon) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

2.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Video 2.1

Demonstration of the movement done with the “flag” manoeuvre and the way it allows to obtain the Critical View of Safety (MP4 11419 kb)

Video 2.2

“Classical” iatrogenic lesion of the CBD. Improper view, without having obtained CVS. The cystic duct is short and narrow and too much traction gives raise to “camel hump” of the CBD (at 01:58). Intraoperative cholangiography does not help avoiding the lesion; it only shows that it has been produced (MP4 59698 kb)

Video 2.3

An “almost” correct view of CVS has been obtained but it is not enough; it lacks freeing of the lower third of the gallbladder from its bed. There is a “camel hump” and the surgeon cuts a tubular structure without proper identification or control. The hepatic artery is well visualised, pulsating. Cystic duct arises from the right hepatic duct (MP4 62096 kb)

Video 2.4

Many wrong technical steps in this cholecystectomy: gallbladder wrongly grasped and wrongly positioned. Lack of vision at the infundibulum. Aggressive and not appropriate forceps. Cutting structures without proper dissection, without proper identification and following cutting with aggressive cautery (MP4 39121 kb)

Video 2.5

The use of electrosurgery, specially using the hook, can be extremely dangerous as, sometimes, there is a lack of control of the instrument. In this video, the hook, while dissecting the hilum of the gallbladder, “jumps” without being controlled, to the anterior surface of the duodenum. It was still active and burned the duodenum. The surgeon saw it but thought it would be a minimal problem. First day post-op, there was a duodenal perforation (MP4 7012 kb)

Video 2.6

Acute situations can be complex and inflammation makes strong alterations in local anatomy. Acute cholecystitis can be accompanied by local abscesses (MP4 13069 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schiappa, J.M. (2016). Complications in Biliary Surgery: Tips and Tricks. In: Avci, C., Schiappa, J. (eds) Complications in Laparoscopic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19623-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19623-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19622-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19623-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics