Skip to main content

Clinical Assessment and Other Instrumental Examinations

  • Chapter
Male Stress Urinary Incontinence

Abstract

The aetiology of male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) may be partly associated with demographic factors, for example aging and obesity [1], but it is also linked to the growing common treatment of prostate diseases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Stothers L, Thom D, Calhoun E (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: urinary incontinence in males – demographics and economic burden. J Urol 173(4):1302–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003) Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations. AUA Practice Guidelines Committee. J Urol 170 (2 Pt 1):530–547

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R (2006) Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 50(5):969–979

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Augustin H, Pummer K, Daghofer F, Habermann H, Primus G, Hubmer G (2002) Patient self-reporting questionnaire on urological morbidity and bother after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 42:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burkhard FC, Kessler TM, Fleischmann A, Thalmann GN, Schumacher M, Studer UE (2006) Nerve-sparing open radical retropubic prostatectomy—does it have an impact on urinary continence? J Urol 176:189–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z et al (2005) Five-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol 173:1701–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rudy DC, Woodside JR, Crawford ED (1984) Urodynamic evaluation of incontinence in patients undergoing modified Campbell radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study. J Urol 132:708–712

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ficazzola MA, Nitti VW (1998) The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol 180:1317–1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chao R, Mayo ME (1995) Incontinence after radical prostatectomy:detrusor or sphincteric causes. J Urol 154:16–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dasautel MG, Kappor R, Balani GH (1997) Sphincteric incontinence: the primary cause of post-prostatectomy incontinence in patients with prostate cancer. Neurourol Urodynam 16:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammerer P, Huland H (1997) Urodynamic evaluation of changes of urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 157:233–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goluboff ET, Chang DT, Olsson CA et al (1995) Urodynamics and the etiology of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. The initial Columbia experience. J Urol 153:1034–1037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kleinhans B, Gerharz E, Melekos M et al (1999) Changes of urodynamic findings after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 35:217–222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Winters JC, Appell RA, Rackley RR (1998) Urodynamic findings in post-prostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodynam 17:493–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Khan Z, Mieza M, Starer P et al (1991) Post-prostatectomy incontinence: a urodynamic and fluoroscopic point of view. Urology 38:483–488

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Foote J, Yun S, Leach GE (1991) Post-prostatectomy incontinence. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Urol Clin North Am 18:229–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Carlson KV, Nitti VW (2001) Prevention and management of incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28:595–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC, Weiss JP, Verhaaren M (2000) The pathophysiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: a clinical and video urodynamic study. J Urol 163:1767–1770

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Noguchi M, Shimada A, Nakashima O, Kojiro M, Matsuoka K (2006) Urodynamic evaluation of a suspension technique for rapid recovery of continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 13:373–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, Levin H (1994) Impact of bladderneck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology 44:883–887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wille S, Varga Z, von Knobloch R, Hofmann R (2005) Intussusception of bladder neck improves early continence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective trial. Urology 65:524–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poon M, Ruckle H, Bamshad BR, Tsai C, Webster R, Lui P (2000) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder-neck preservation versus reconstruction. J Urol 163:194–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Brasa KG, Petsch M, Lim A, Civantos F, Soloway MS (1995) Bladder neck preservation following radical prostatectomy: continence and margins. Eur Urol 28:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ravery V (2005) How to preserve continence after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol Suppl 4(4):8–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hellstrom P, Lukkarinen O, Kontturi M (1989) Urodynamics in radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 23:21–24

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Saad K, Alan W (2013) Incontinence 5th Edition. ICUD-EAU

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agarwal P, Rosenberg ML (2003) Neurological evaluation of urinary incontinence in the female patient. Neurologist 9:110–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Winters JC, Appell RA, Rackley RR (1998) Urodynamic findings in postprostatectomy incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 17(5):493–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21(2):167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):4–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Brown JS, McNaughton KS, Wyman JF et al (2003) Measurement characteristics of a voiding diary for use by men and women with overactive bladder. Urology 61(4):802–809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nygaard I, Holcomb R (2000) Reproducibility of the seven-day voiding diary in women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11(1):15–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Groutz A, Blaivas JG, Chaikin DC et al (2000) Non invasive outcome measures of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms a multicenter study of micturition diary and pad tests. J Urol 184:698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abrams P, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL, Andersen JL (1990) Standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Quantification of urinary loss. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97(Suppl 6):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  35. Krhut J, Zachoval R, Smith PP, Rosier PFWM, Valansky L, Martan A, Zvara P (2014) Pad Weight Testing in the Evaluation of urinary Incontinnece. Neurourology and Urodynamics 33:507–510

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brandes SB, Bullock AD (2007) Update on male urinary stress incontinence. Missouri Med 104:425–429

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Machold S, Olbert PJ, Hegele A, Kleinhans G, Hofmann R, Schrader AJ (2009) Comparison of a 20-min pad test with the 1-hour pad test of international continence society to evaluate post prostatectomy incontinence. Urol Int 83:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gerber GS, Goldfischer ER, Karrison TG, Bales GT (1997) Serum creatinine measurements in men with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 49:697–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roehrborn CG, Bartsch G, Kirby R et al (2001) Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a comparative, international overview. Urology 58:642–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rule AD, Jacobson DJ, Roberts RO, Girman CJ et al (2005) The association between benign prostatic hyperplasia and chronic kidney disease in community-dwelling men. Kidney Int 67:2376–2382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McConnell J, Roehrborn C, Bautista OM et al (2003) The long term effects of doxazosin, finasteride and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. New Engl J Med 349:2387–2398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Goode PS, Locher JL, Bryant RL et al (2000) Measurement of postvoid residual urine with portable transabdominal bladder ultrasound scanner and urethral catheterization. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11(5):296–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Griffiths DJ, Harrison G, Moore K et al (1996) Variability of post-void residual urine volume in the elderly. Urol Res 24(1):23–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Marks LS, Dorey FJ, Macairan ML et al (1997) Three-dimensional ultrasound device for rapid determination of bladder volume. Urology 50(3):341–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nygaard IE (1996) Postvoid residual volume cannot be accurately estimated by bimanual examination. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7(2):74–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ouslander JG, Simmons S, Tuico E et al (1994) Use of a portable ultrasound device to measure post-void residual volume among incontinent nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 42(11):1189–1192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stoller ML, Millard RJ (1989) The accuracy of a catheterized residual urine. J Urol 141(1):15–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chatelain C, Denis L, Foo K, Khoury S, McConnell J (2001) The urodynamic assessment of lower urinary tract symptoms. In: Abrams P, Griffiths D, Hoefner K, Liao L, Schafer W, Tubaro A, Zimmern P (eds) Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Health Publication Ltd., Plymouth, pp 227–281

    Google Scholar 

  49. Samplaski MK, Jones JS (2009) Two centuries of cystoscopy: the development of imaging, instrumentation and synergistic technologies. BJU Int 103(2):154–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stoker J, Rociu E, Zwamborn AW, Schouten WR, Lameris JS (1999) Endoluminal MR imaging of the rectum and anus: technique, applications, and pitfalls. Radiographics 19:383–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Guo M, Li D (2007) Pelvic floor images: anatomy of the levator ani muscle. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1647–1655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hsu Y, Fenner DE, Weadock WJ, DeLancey JO (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and 3-dimensional analysis of external anal sphincter anatomy. Obstet Gynecol 106:1259–1265

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bauer RM, Mayer EM, Gratzke C, Soljanik I, Buchner A, Bastian PJ, Stief CJ, Gozzi C (2009) Prospective evaluation of the functional sling suspension for male postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: results after 1 year. Eu Urol 56:928–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Comiter CV, Sullivan MP, Yalla SV (1997) Retrograde leak point pressure for evaluating postradical prostatectomy incontinence. Urology 49(2):231–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Comiter CV, Nitti V, Elliot C, Rhee E (2012) A new quadratic sling for male stress incontinence: retrograde leak point pressure as a measure of urethral resistance. J Urol 187(2):563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Burden H, Warren K, Abrams P (2013) Diagnosis of male incontinence. Curr Opin Urol 23(6):509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lockhart ME, Fielding JR, Richter HE et al (2008) Reproducibility of dynamic MR imaging pelvic measurements: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 249(2):534–540

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Woodfield CA, Krishnamoorthy S, Hampton BS et al (2010) Imaging pelvic floor disorders: trend toward comprehensive MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194(6):1640–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Coakley FV, Eberhardt S, Kattan MW, Wei DC, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2002) Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 168:1032–1035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Song C, Doo CK, Hong JH, Choo MS, Kim CS, Ahn H (2007) Relationship between the integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and early recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 178:208–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lee SE, Hong SK, Han JH et al (2007) Significance of neurovascular bundle formation observed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging regarding postoperative erectile function after nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 69:510–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Morgan DM, Umek W, Guire K et al (2009) Urethral sphincter morphology and function with and without stress incontinence. J Urol 182(1):203–209

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Digesu GA, Robinson D, Cardozo L et al (2009) Three-dimensional ultrasound of the urethral sphincter predicts continence surgery outcome. Neurourol Urodyn 28(1):90–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Nguyen L, Jhaveri J, Tewari A (2008) Surgical technique to overcome anatomical shortcoming: balancing post-prostatectomy continence outcomes of urethral sphincter lengths on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 179(5):1907–1911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mikuma N, Tamagawa M, Morita K, Tsukamoto T (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging of the male pelvic floor: the anatomical configuration and dynamic movement in healthy men. Neurourol Urodyn 17(6):591–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Suskind AM, DeLancey JO, Hussain HK, Montgomery JS, Latini JM, Cameron AP (2014) Dynamic MRI evaluation of urethral hypermobility post-radical prostatectomy. Neurourol Urodyn 33(3):312–315

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pistolesi D, Zampa V, Gozzi C, Mariani C, Santarsieri M, Faggioni L, Bartolozzi C, Selli C (2014) Could the sling position influence the clinical outcome in male patients treated for urinary incontinence? A magnetic resonance imaging study with a 3 Tesla system. Urology 83(2):471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Soljanik I, Bauer RM, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Gozzi C, Soljanik O, Kirchhoff SM (2013) Morphology and dynamics of the male pelvic floor before and after retrourethral transobturator sling placement: first insight using MRI. World J Urol 31(3):629–638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Shek KL, Chantarasorn V, Dietz HP (2010) The urethral motion profile before and after suburethral sling placement. J Urol 183(4):1450–1454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Chantarasorn V, Shek KL, Dietz HP (2011) Sonographic appearance of transobturator slings: implications for function and dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 22(4):493–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Papin G, Tissot V, Le Penndu H, Nonent H, Fournier G (2012) Evaluation du positionnement de la bandelette retro-urètrale transobturatrice par IRM pelvienne statique et dynamique. Progr Urol 22:602–609

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Soljanik I, Becker AJ, Stief CG, Gozzi C, Bauer RM (2010) Repeat retrourethral transobturator sling in the management of recurrent postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence after failed first male sling. Eur Urol 58:767–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. White RD, McQuown D, McCarthy TA, Ostergard DR (1980) Realtime ultrasonography in the evaluation of urinary stress incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138(2):235–237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Athanasiou S, Khullar V, Boos K, Salvatore S, Cardozo L (1999) Imaging the urethral sphincter with three-dimensional ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol 94(2):295–301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Kirschner-Hermanns R, Najjari L, Brehmer B, Blum R, Zeuch V, Maass N, Heidenreich A (2012) Two- and three-/four dimensional perineal ultrasonography in men with urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 109(1):46–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Chan L, Tse V (2012) 1355 Dynamic compression of the urethra – the role of US imaging in understanding how the male transobturator sling works. J Urol 187(4 Suppl), e550

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Mariani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pistolesi, D., Mariani, C., Selli, C. (2015). Clinical Assessment and Other Instrumental Examinations. In: Del Popolo, G., Pistolesi, D., Li Marzi, V. (eds) Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19252-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19252-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19251-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19252-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics