Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constrictive Devices

  • Chapter
Male Stress Urinary Incontinence

Part of the book series: Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions ((UNPFD))

  • 829 Accesses

Abstract

Male stress urinary incontinence has been a difficult challenge for the urologist. The proper patient’s selection for surgery and the choice of the most appropriate surgical options have been reported.

Literature results of various surgical procedures, from the gold standard, to the newest emerging techniques have been accurately described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abrams P, Anderson KE, Birder L et al (2009) Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 3rd international consultation on incontinence. Health Publications Ltd, Paris, pp 1767–1820

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaufman JJ (1970) A new operation for male incontinence. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131(2):295–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer RM, Gozzi C, Hübner W et al (2011) Contemporary management of post prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 59(6):985–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Scott FB, Bradley WE, Timm GW (1974) Treatment of urinary incontinence by an implantable prosthetic urinary sphincter. J Urol 112(1):75–80

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schroder A, Abrams P, Andersson KE et al (2010) Guidelines on urinary incontinence. In: rnheim AG (ed) EAU Guidelines. European Association of Urology, Arnheim, pp 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  6. Imamoglu MA, Tuygun C, Bakirtas H et al (2005) The comparison of artificial urinary sphincter implantation and endourethral macroplastique injection for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 47:209–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva LA, Andriolo RB, Atallah ÁN et al (2014) Surgery for stress urinary incontinence due to presumed sphincter deficiency after prostate surgery (Review). Issue 9. The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by JohnWiley & Sons, Ltd. www.cochranelibrary.com/

  8. Lucas MG, Bosch JLHR, Cruz F et al (2012) Guidelines on urinary incontinence. European Association of Urology Web site. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/18_Urinary_Incontinence_LR_1%20October%202012

  9. Stoffel JT, Barrett DM (2008) The artificial genitourinary sphincter. BJU Int 102(5):644–658

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Savage C et al (2012) Surgical practice patterns for male urinary incontinence: analysis of case logs from certifying American urologists. J Urol 188(1):205–210

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarvis TR, Sandhu JS (2014) Management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 15(7):421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gousse AE, Madjar S, Lambert MM et al (2001) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-radical prostatectomy urinary incontinence: long-term subjective results. J Urol 166(5):1755–1758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR et al (2013) Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol 63(4):681–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Herschorn S, Bruschini H, Comiter C et al (2010) Committee of the International Consultation on Incontinence. Surgical treatment of stress incontinence in men. Neurourol Urodyn 29(1):179–190, Review

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Kampen M, De Weerdt W, Van Poppel H et al (2000) Effect of pelvic-floor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 355(9198):98–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G et al (2005) Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 48(5):734–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fantl JA, Newman D, Colling J et al (1996) Urinary incontinence in adults: acute and chronic management. Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 2. Rockport: U.S. Department of Health and Human; Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication No. 96–0682

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foote J, Yun S, Leach GE (1991) Postprostatectomy incontinence. Pathophysiology, evaluation, and management. Urol Clin North Am 18(2):229–241

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Leach GE, Yip CM (1986) Urologic and urodynamic evaluation of the elderly population. Clin Geriatr Med 2(4):731–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hubner WA, Schlarp OM (2007) Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): Evolution of the surgical technique and comparison of the original 50 patients with the most recent 50 patients at a single centre. Eur Urol 52(3):680–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thiel DD, Young PR, Broderick GA et al (2007) Do clinical or urodynamic parameters predict artificial urinary sphincter outcome in post-radical prostatectomy incontinence? Urology 69(2):315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lai HH, Boone TB (2011) Implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence, and preoperative overactive bladder and mixed symptoms. J Urol 185(6):2254–2259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Magera JS Jr, Inman BA, Elliott DS (2007) Does preoperative topical antimicrobial scrub reduce positive surgical site culture rates in men undergoing artificial urinary sphincter placement? J Urol 178(4 Pt 1):1328–1332, discussion 1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeung LL, Grewal S, Bullock A et al (2013) A comparison of chlorhexidine-alcohol versus povidone-iodine for eliminating skin flora before genitourinary prosthetic surgery: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol 189(1):136–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Guralnick ML, Miller E, Toh KL et al (2002) Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter cuff placement in cases requiring revision for erosion and urethral atrophy. J Urol 167(5):2075–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sotelo TM, Westney OL (2008) Outcomes related to placing an artificial urinary sphincter using a single-incision, transverse-scrotal technique in high-risk patients. BJU Int 101(9):1124–1127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. DiMarco DS, Elliott DS (2003) Tandem cuff artificial urinary sphincter as a salvage procedure following failed primary sphincter placement for the treatment of post-prostatectomy incontinence. J Urol 170(4 Pt 1):1252–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilson S, Delk J, Henr G et al (2003) New surgical technique for sphincter urinary control system using upper transverse scrotal incision. J Urol 169(1):261–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Aaronson DS, Elliott SP, McAninch JW (2008) Transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter placement for incontinence in high-risk patients after treatment of prostate cancer. Urology 72(4):825–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yates DR, Phé V, Rouprêt M et al (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic artificial urinary sphincter insertion in men with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 111(7):1175–1179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rouprêt M, Misraï V, Vaessen C et al (2010) Laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: a single-centre preliminary experience. Eur Urol 57(3):499–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Trolliet S, Mandron E, Lang H et al (2013) Laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with severe urinary stress incontinence. Prog Urol 23(10):877–883

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lai HH, Hsu EI, Teh BS et al (2007) 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol 177((3):1021–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Raj GV, Peterson AC, Webster GD (2006) Outcomes following erosions of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 175(6):2186–2190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Cógáin M, Elliott D (2013) The impact of InhibiZone® on artificial urinary sphincter infection rate. Abstract 1373. In: Paper presented at AUA annual meeting 2013

    Google Scholar 

  36. de Cógáin MR, Elliott DS (2013) The impact of an antibiotic coating on the artificial urinary sphincter infection rate. J Urol 190(1):113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sandhu J (2014) Management of complications and residual symptoms in men with an artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol 192(2):303–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Linder BJ, de Cogain M, Elliott DS (2014) Long-term device outcomes for artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection. J Urol 191(3):734–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Simhan J, Allen F, Morey AF, Lee C et al (2014) Decreasing need for artificial urinary sphincter revision surgery by precise cuff sizing in men with spongiosal atrophy. J Urol 192(3):798–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Simhan J, Morey AF, Singla N et al (2015) 3.5 cm artificial urinary sphincter cuff erosion occurs predominantly in irradiated patients. J Urol 193(2):593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McGeady JB, McAninch JW, Truesdale MD et al (2014) Artificial urinary sphincter placement in compromised urethras and survival: a comparison of virgin, radiated and reoperative cases. J Urol 192(6):1756–1761

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kowalczyk JJ, Spicer DL, Mulcahy JJ (1996) Long-term experience with the double-cuff AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter. Urology 47(6):895–897

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brucker BM, Demirtas A, Fong E et al (2013) Artificial urinary sphincter revision: the role of ultrasound. Urology 82(6):1424–1428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sandhu JS, Maschino AC, Vickers AJ (2011) The surgical learning curve for artificial urinary sphincter procedures compared to typical surgeon experience. Eur Urol 60(6):1285–1290

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weissbart SJ, Chughtai B, Elterman D et al (2013) Management of anastomotic stricture after artificial urinary sphincter placement in patients who underwent salvage prostatectomy. Urology 82(2):476–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lucas MG, Bedretdinova D, Bosch JLHR (2014) EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/20%20Urinary%20Incontinence

  47. Léon P, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprêt M (2014) Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in men with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/bju.12848. [Epub ahead of print]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Segal RL, Cabrini MR, Harris ED et al (2013) Combined inflatable penile prosthesis-artificial urinary sphincter implantation: no increased risk of adverse events compared to single or staged device implantation. J Urol 190(6):2183–2188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wyndaele JJ et al (2005) Neurologic urinary and faecal incontinence: chap 17. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 3rd international consultation on incontinence. Health Publications Ltd, Paris, pp 1059–1162

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hussain M, Greenwell TJ, Venn SN et al (2005) The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of urinary incontinence. J Urol 174(2):418–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lopez Pereira P, Somoza Ariba I, Martınez Urrutia MJ et al (2006) Artificial urinary sphincter: 11-year experience in adolescents with congenital neuropathic bladder. Eur Urol 50(5):1096–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bersch U, Gocking K, Pannek J (2009) The artificial urinary sphincter in patients with spinal cord lesion: description of a modified technique and clinical results. Eur Urol 55(3):687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Farag F, Koens M, Sievert KD et al (2014) Treatment of neurogenic stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of quality assessment and surgical outcomes. Neurourol Urodyn. doi:10.1002/nau.22682. [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  54. Gregori A, Romanò AL, Scieri F et al (2010) Transrectal ultrasound-guided implantation of adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): surgical technique and clinical results after a mean follow-up of 2 years. Eur Urol 57(3):430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Crivellaro S, Tosco L, Palazzetti A et al (2012) Geometrical stepper-guided navigation system for ProACT implant under transrectal ultrasound control: preliminary data. Urol Int 89(4):473–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Lebret T, Cour F, Benchetrit J et al (2008) Treatment of postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence using a minimally invasive adjustable continence balloon device, ProACT: results of a preliminary, multicenter, pilot study. Urology 71(2):256–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Kocjancic E, Crivellaro S, Ranzoni S et al (2007) Adjustable continence therapy for the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence: a single-centre study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41(4):324–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Crivellaro S, Singla A, Aggarwal N et al (2008) Adjustable continence therapy (ProACT) and bone anchored male sling: comparison of two new treatments of post prostatectomy incontinence. Int J Urol 15(10):910–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chung E, Ranaweera M, Cartmill R (2012) Newer and novel artificial urinary sphincters (AUS): the development of alternatives to the current AUS device. BJU Int 2012(Suppl 4):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Knight SL, Susser J, Greenwell T et al (2006) A new artificial urinary sphincter with conditional occlusion for stress urinary incontinence: preliminary clinical results. Eur Urol 50(3):574–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vallejo JEB, Montes FG, Rosell LC et al (2009) Implantation technique of the artificial urinary sphincter flow secure™ in the bulbar urethra. Arch Esp de Urol 62(3):195–200

    Google Scholar 

  62. Alonso Rodriguez D et al (2001) One hundred FlowSecure artificial urinary sphincters. In: Paper presented ta EAU annual congress 2011 (Abstract). http://www.uroweb.org/events/abstracts-online/?id=108&no_cache=1&AID=32356

  63. Schiavini JL, Damião R, de Resende Júnior JA et al (2010) Treatment of post-prostate surgery urinary incontinence with the periurethral constrictor: a retrospective analysis. Urology 75(6):1488–1492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Introini C, Naselli A, Zaninetta G et al (2012) Safety and efficacy of periurethral constrictor implantation for the treatment of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence. Urology 79(5):1175–1178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Staerman F, G-Llorens C, Leon P et al (2013) ZSI 375 artificial urinary sphincter for male urinary incontinence: a preliminary study. BJU Int 111(4 Pt B):E202–E206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Kim SP, Sarmast Z, Daignault S et al (2008) Long-term durability and functional outcomes among patients with artificial urinary sphincters: a 10-year retrospective review from the University of Michigan. J Urol 179(5):1912–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Pérez LM, Webster GD (1992) Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation feature. J Urol 148(4):1166–1170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Montague DK (1992) The artificial urinary sphincter (AS 800): experience in 166 consecutive patients. J Urol 147(2):380–382

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD et al (1996) Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol 156(6):1975–1980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Haab F, Trockman BA, Zimmern PE et al (1997) Quality of life and continence assessment of the artificial urinary sphincter in men with minimum 3.5 years of followup. J Urol 158(2):435–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Mottet N, Boyer C, Chartier-Kastler E et al (1998) Artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: the French experience. Urol Int 60(Suppl 2):25–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Gomes CM, Broderick GA, Sánchez-Ortiz RF et al (2000) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence: impact of prior collagen injection on cost and clinical outcome. J Urol 163(1):87–90

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Montague DK, Angermeier KW, Paolone DR (2001) Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. J Urol 166(2):547–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Gomha MA, Boone TB (2002) Artificial urinary sphincter for post-prostatectomy incontinence in men who had prior radiotherapy: a risk and outcome analysis. J Urol 167(2 Pt 1):591–596

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gülpınar O, Süer E, Gökce MI et al (2013) Functional outcomes and long-term durability of artificial urinary sphincter application: review of 56 patients with long-term follow-up. Korean J Urol 54(6):373–376

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G (2009) Editorial comment on: the artificial urinary sphincter in patients with spinal cord lesion: description of a modified technique and clinical results. Eur Urol 55(3):694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    Vincenzo Li Marzi, Chiara Cini & Sergio Serni

  2. Neurourology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    Giulio Del Popolo

Authors
  1. Vincenzo Li Marzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chiara Cini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergio Serni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giulio Del Popolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Li Marzi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. AOU Careggi Univ Hospital Neuro-Urology dept, Firenze, Italy

    Giulio Del Popolo

  2. Urology Department, AOU Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy

    Donatella Pistolesi

  3. Department of Urology, AOU Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy

    Vincenzo Li Marzi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li Marzi, V., Cini, C., Serni, S., Del Popolo, G. (2015). Constrictive Devices. In: Del Popolo, G., Pistolesi, D., Li Marzi, V. (eds) Male Stress Urinary Incontinence. Urodynamics, Neurourology and Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19252-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19252-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19251-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19252-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation