Skip to main content

Environmental-Microbial Biotechnology Inside Mining Operations from an Engineering Viewpoint Based on LCA

  • Chapter
Environmental Microbial Biotechnology

Part of the book series: Soil Biology ((SOILBIOL,volume 45))

  • 2210 Accesses

Abstract

The relationship between the mining industry, society, and environment has been historically complex due to the number and scale of operational impacts. Today, the mining sector is at a tipping point to achieve equilibrium between high levels of production and minimizing environmental impacts. A feasible and novel approach to solve this need is the incorporation of concepts from industrial ecology to mining processes. Such approach could support an integrated management of materials available inside mine plants delivered by other industrial and depurative activities. Mining operations tend to be characterized as a conservative industry with few opportunities to innovate particularly with consideration to the application of microbial biotechnology at a large scale inside mineral processing plants, waste treatment, and ore recovery limited to bio-hydrometallurgical processing (e.g., Biolixiviation).

Several examples can be found inside mining operations where the application of microbial biotechnology has proven to improve the overall environmental impacts. One example is related to waste management in the mining industry; the main wastes are the solid deposits such as the tailings storage facilities, sterile piles, and lixiviation piles. Waste treatment has put focus on phytoremediation processes without the inclusion of environmental-microbial communities to complement phytoremediation treatment as recovering agents of ores.

Another environmental concern is the unseen pollution of small spills of oil that occur during the repair and maintenance of machinery, as well as accidents. Continuous fuel spills generally get absorbed by desert soils and sawdust as a low-cost and locally available sorbent material to control environmental pollution. This management strategy results in large amounts of fuel-contaminated materials. These materials have accumulated on hazardous waste landfills over time and require cleaning. In this case, bioremediation can potentially be a good approach to be applied as a sustainable remediation strategy. This method can be conducted through the direct action of microbial communities that use such organic compounds as an exogenous source of carbon and energy, converting them to more stable and innocuous forms benefitting the environment. This process has so far been proven at a lab scale under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, testing physical and chemical parameters, concentration, and quality of the contaminant. The difficulty of studies on oil spills is due to the high rates of uncertainty to determine kinetics of degradation and speeds of remediation as tools for the prediction of feasibility for treatment and the final residual concentration posttreatment.

To achieve a better understanding of the impact of the application of microbial biotechnologies for ore recovery, the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) will prove necessary. Our objective in this chapter is to make a conceptual model of environmental-microbial biotechnologies that can be applied to mining operations based on LCA methodology considering sustainable bioremediation processes and industrial ecology models as the main frameworks to innovate within industrial activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Daher R, Al-Awadhi N, Yateem A, Balba MT, ElNawawy A (2001) Compost soil piles for treatment of oil-contaminated soil. Soil Sediment Contam 10:197–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antizar-Ladislao B, Lopez-Real JM, Beck AJ (2004) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated waste using composting approaches. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 34:249–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antizar-Ladislao B, Lopez-Real J, Beck AJ (2006) Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in an aged coal-tar contaminated soil under in-vessel composting conditions. Environ Pollut 141:459–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arundel A, Rose A (1999) The diffusion of environmental biotechnology in Canada: adoption strategies and cost offsets. Technovation 19:551–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas R, Bartha R (1998) “Ecología microbiana y microbiología ambiental” 4ª Edición Cap13: Interacciones microbianas con contaminantes xenobióticos e inorgánicos Cap 14: Ensayos de biodegradabilidad y seguimiento de la bioremediación de contaminantes xenobióticos

    Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic A (2014) Sustainability considerations for integrated biorefineries. Trends Biotechnol 32(1):1–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balba MT, Al-Daher R, Al-Awadhi N, Chino H, Tsuji H (1998) Bioremediation of oil-contaminated desert soil: the Kuwaiti experience. Environ Int 24:163–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Tillman AM (2004) The Hitch Hiker’s guide to LCA: an orientation in life cycle assessment methodology and applications. Studentliettaratur AB, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer P, Finkel M (2006) Life cycle assessment of active and passive groundwater remediation technologies. J Contam Hydrol 83(3):171–199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beinat E, van Drunen MA, Janssen R, Nijboer MH, Koolenbrander JGM, Okx JP, Schütte AR (1997) REC: a methodology for comparing soil remedial alternatives based on the criteria of risk reduction, environmental merit and costs. CUR/Nobis report 95-10-3, Gouda, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK, Davenport WG (2002) Extractive metallurgy of copper, 4th edn. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc A, Métivier-Pignon H, Gourdon R, Rousseaux P (2004) Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur. Adv Environ Res 8:613–627

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley C, Brierley J (2013) Progress in bioleaching: part B: applications of microbial processes by the minerals industries. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:7543–7552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland GH, United Nations WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulatovic M (2007) Handbook of flotation reagents: chemistry, theory and practice: flotation of sulphides ores. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 446 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte M, Deschênes L, Samson R (2007) Selection of a remediation scenario for a diesel-contaminated site using LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(4):239–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai QY, Mo CH, Wu QT, Zeng QZ, Katsoyiannis A, Ferard JF (2007) Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)-contaminated sewage sludge by different composting processes. J Hazard Mater 142:535–542

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canet R, Birnstingl JG, Malcolm DG, Lopez-Real JM, Beck AJ (2001) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by native microflora and combinations of white-rot fungi in a coal-tar contaminated soil. Bioresour Technol 76:113–117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cochilco, Corporación Chilena del Cobre (2011) Yearbook: copper and other mineral statistics 1992–2011. Santiago, 172 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SD, Andersson TA, Schwab AP, Hsu FC (1996) Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Adv Agron 56:55–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dejonghe W, Boon N, Seghers D, Top EM, Verstraete W (2001) Bioaugmentation of soils by increasing microbial richness: missing links. Environ Microbiol 3(10):649–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond ML, Page CA, Campbell M, McKenna S, Lall R (1999) Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: method and generic survey. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(4):788–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dua M, Singh A, Sethunathan N, Johri A (2002) Biotechnology and bioremediation: successes and limitations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59:143–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dummet K (2006) Drivers for corporate environmental responsibility (CER). Environ Dev Sustain 8:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emtairah T, Jacobsson N, Kogg K, Lissinger L, Mont O (2002) Who creates the market for green products? An analysis of the role of different actors in relation to supply and demand of green products. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commissions (2014) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions towards a circular economy: a zero waste programme for Europe. /* COM/2014/0398 final */. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0398

  • Fonseca A, McAllister ML, Fitzpatrick P (2013) Sustainability reporting among mining corporations: a constructive critique of the GRI approach. J Clean Prod 46–47:180–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentina J, Acevedo F (2013) Application of bioleaching to copper mining in Chile. Electron J Biotechnol 16(3):1–16. doi:10.2225/vol16-issue3-fulltext-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin J, Menard JF, Hains S, Deschenes L, Samson R (2004) Combined use of life cycle assessment and groundwater transport modeling to support contaminated site management. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10(6):1099–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy-Faundez A, Antizar-Ladislao B, Reyes-Bozo L, Camaño A, Sáez-Navarrete C (2008) Bioremediation of contaminated mixtures of desert mining soil and sawdust with fuel oil by aerated in-vessel composting in the Atacama region (Chile). J Hazard Mater 151:649–657

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy-Faúndez A, Reyez-Bozo L, Sáez-Navarrete C, Antizar-Ladislao B (2008) Differential metabolic changes in microbial communities, explain the bioremediation of organic contaminants in the Atacama Desert (Chile). In: 4th European bioremediation conference, 3–6 Sept 2008, Chania, Crete, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  • GRI (2012) GRI sustainability disclosure database global reporting initiative (GRI), Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF (1999) Bioremediation of phenols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in creosote contaminated soil using ex-situ land treatment. J Hazard Mater 1999(65):305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin TF (2000) The differential removal of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from soil during bioremediation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 7:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICMM (2012) Our work: sustainable development framework international council on mining and metals, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Illinois EPA (2008) Illinois’ greener cleanups matrix: how to maximize the environmental benefits of site remediation, Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. Available from http://www.epastateilus/land/greener-cleanups/matrixpdf. Accessed 7 July 2010

  • ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DB (2013) Development and application of biotechnologies in the metal mining industry. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7768–7776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DB (2014) Biomining—biotechnologies for extracting and recovering metals from ores and waste materials. Curr Opin Biotechnol 30:24–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kechavarzi C, Pettersson K, Leeds-Harrison P, Ritchie L, Ledin S (2007) Root establishment of perennial ryegrass (L-perenne) in diesel contaminated subsurface soil layers. Environ Pollut 145:68–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lemming G, Hauschild M, Bjerg P (2010) Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:115–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren B, Tillman A, Rinde B (2011) Manufacturing actor’s LCA. J Clean Prod 19(17–18):2025–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAC Mining Association of Canada (2014) Towards sustainable mining. Available at http://www.mining.ca

  • Macek T, Mackova M, Kas J (2000) Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol Adv 18:23–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mader BT, UweGoss K, Eisenreich SJ (1997) Sorption of nonionic, hydrophobic organic chemicals to mineral surfaces. Environ Sci Technol 31:1079–1086

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan BC, Corder GD (2012) Risk reduction through early assessment and integration of sustainability in design in the minerals industry. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/jjclepro201202014

    Google Scholar 

  • Meller P (2013) Analysis of Chilean economic and development performance from the copper perspective. In: Copper conference, Santiago, 1–4 Dec 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Memary R, Giurco D, Mudd G, Mason L (2012) Life cycle assessment: a time-series analysis of copper. J Clean Prod 33:97–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Minera Escondida (2007) Minera Escondida, certified with ISO 14001 Atacama. www.escondidacl/Escondida/ingles/indexhtml

  • Ministry of Environment (1994) General baseline of environmental La N°19,300, Government of Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment (2012) National climate change action plan 2008–2012, Government of Chile. http://www.mmagobcl/1304/w3-article-54783html

  • Ministry of Health (2004) Decreto Supremo Nª148, Sanitary normative on handling hazardous wastes, Government of Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra D, Ha Rhee Y (2014) Microbial leaching of metals from solid industrial wastes. J Microbiol 52(1):1–7. doi:10.1007/s12275-014-3532-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moors EHM, Mulder KF, Vergragt PJ (2005) Towards cleaner production: barriers and strategies in the base metals producing industry. J Clean Prod 13:657–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrayyan B, Battikhi MN (2005) Biodegradation of total organic carbons (TOC) in Jordanian petroleum sludge. J Hazard Mater 120:127–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mudd GM (2010) The ultimate sustainability of mining: linking key mega-trends with 21st century challenges. In: Sustainable mining 2010 conference, AusIMM, Kalgoorlie, pp 351–373, August 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray A, Horvath A, Nelson KL (2008) Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios: a case study from China. Environ Sci Technol 42:3163–3169

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Norgate T, Haque N (2010) Energy and greenhouse gas impacts of mining and mineral processing operations. J Clean Prod 18:266–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Northey S, Haque N, Mudd G (2013) Using sustainability reporting to assess the environmental footprint of copper mining. J Clean Prod 40:118–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oyarzún J, Oyarzún R (2011) Sustainable development threats, inter-sector conflicts and environmental policy requirements in the arid, mining rich, northern Chile territory. Sustain Dev 19(4):263–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page CA, Diamond ML, Campbell M, McKenna S (1999) Life-cycle framework for assessment of site remediation options: case study. Environ Toxicol Chem 18(4):801–810

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings D (2002) Heavy metal mining using microbes. Annu Rev Microbiol 56:65–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Bozo L, Godoy-Faúndez A, Herrea-Urbina R, Higueras P, Salazar J, Valdés-Gonzalez H, Vhymeister E, Antizar-Ladislao B (2014) Greening Chilean copper mining operations through industrial ecology strategies. J Clean Prod 84:671–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ribbenhed M, Wolf-Watz C, Almemark M, Palm A, Sternbeck J (2002) Livscykelanalys av marksaneringstekniker fàr fàrorenad jord och sediment (Life cycle assessment of remediation technologies for contaminated soil and sediment). IVL Rapport/report B1476 IVL. Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • ScanRail Consult, HOH Water Technology A/S, NIRAS Consulting Engineers and Planners A/S, Revisorsamvirket/Pannell Kerr Forster (2000) Environmental/economic evaluation and optimising of contaminated sites remediation EU LIFE Project no 96ENV/DK/0016, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Hebbel K (2012) Fiscal policy for commodity exporting countries: Chile’s experience, Documentos de Trabajo 415, Instituto de Economia Pontificia, Universidad Católica de Chile

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple KT, Morriss AWJ, Paton GI (2003) Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils: fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis. Eur J Soil Sci 564:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Siliverstovs B, Herzer D (2005) Manufacturing exports, mining exports and growth: cointegration and causality analysis for Chile (1960–2001). Appl Econ 39(2):153–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toffoletto L, Deschênes L, Samson R (2005) LCA of ex-situ bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Int J LCA 10(6):406–416

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Application, performance, and costs of biotreatment technologies for contaminated soils, EPA/600/R-03/037. USEPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2005) SW846 Methods for evaluating solid wastes physical/chemical methods 8000 series: method 8260 B-method 8270 in agency, USEP (Ed)

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2008) Green remediation: incorporating sustainable environmental practices into remediation of contaminated sites. United States Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available from http://www.clu-in.org/download/remed/green-remediation-primer.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2010

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2010) Principles for greener cleanups [online]. Available from http://www.epa.gov/oswer/greencleanups/principles.html. Accessed 7 July 2010

  • USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2014) Clean up-information (CLU-IN), US Environmental Protection Agency. http://clu-in.org/contaminantfocus/defaultfocus/sec/Fractured_Rock/cat/Overview/

  • Vallejos JP (1994) Historia y minería en Chile: estudios y fuentes. América Latina en la Historia Económica 1:65–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkwein S, Hurtig HW, Klöpffer W (1999) LCA concepts and methods—life cycle assessment of contaminated sites remediation. Int J Life Cycle Assess 4(5):263–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young J, Septoff A (2002) Digging for change: towards a responsible minerals future. An NGO and community perspective, Mineral Policy Centre, Consejo Minero de Chile

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Water Research Center for Agriculture and Mining (WARCAM) supported by CONICYT/Chile in the framework of FONDAP 2013 (Fifth National Competition for Research Centers in Priorities Areas)—CRHIAM/CONICYT/FONDAP 15130015.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex Godoy-Faúndez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Godoy-Faúndez, A., Aitken, D., Reyes-Bozo, L., Rivera, D. (2015). Environmental-Microbial Biotechnology Inside Mining Operations from an Engineering Viewpoint Based on LCA. In: Sukla, L., Pradhan, N., Panda, S., Mishra, B. (eds) Environmental Microbial Biotechnology. Soil Biology, vol 45. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19018-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics