Abstract
Assessing and reporting students’ performance is an important part of every-day teaching. Doing so without focusing on marks but instead on supporting students in further learning by giving individual, process-oriented and task-related feedback to them is a central idea of formative assessment. Within a teacher-training-study as part of the research project Conditions and Consequences of Classroom Assessment (Co2CA), a special in-service teacher training has been developed to foster teachers’ knowledge about formative assessment when dealing with modelling tasks. A test on teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK-test) has been used to evaluate the trainings. Quantitative results point out that teachers having taken part in the trainings outperform teachers not having been trained in formative assessment if dealing with modelling tasks within the PCK-test.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Conditions and Consequences of Classroom Assessment. Research project supported by the German Research Society (DFG) as part of the current priority programme “Kompetenzmodelle zur Erfassung individueller Lernergebnisse und zur Bilanzierung von Bildungsprozessen” (SPP 1293); principal researchers: E. Klieme, K. Rakoczy (both Frankfurt), W. Blum (Kassel), D. Leiss (Lüeneburg). KL 1057/10–3, BL 275/16–3, LE 2619/1–3.
References
Baker, E. L. (2007). The end(s) of testing. Educational Researcher, 36, 309–317.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213–238.
Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47(1), 133–180.
Besser, M., & Blum, W. (2012). Competency-oriented written feedback in every-day mathematics teaching: How to report on students’ solutions or modelling tasks and how to assess the quality of these reports? In The 12th international congress on mathematical education (Pre-Proceedings ) (pp. 3188–3195). Retrieved from http://www.icme12.org
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31.
Blomhoj, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2007). What’s all the fuss about competencies? Experiences with using a competence perspective on mathematics education to develop the teaching of mathematical modelling. In W. Blum, P. L. Galbraith, H. W. Henn, & M. Niss (Eds.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education. The 14th ICMI study (pp. 45–56). New York: Springer.
Blum, W. (2011). Can modelling be taught and learnt? Some answers from empirical research. In G. Kaiser, W. Blum, R. Borromeo Ferri, & G. Stillman (Eds.), Trends in teaching and learning mathematical modelling (pp. 15–30). Dordrecht: Springer.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
Döhrmann, M., Kaiser, G., & Blömeke, S. (2012). The conceptualisation of mathematics competencies in the international teacher education study TEDS-M. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 325–340.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284.
Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 716–725.
Maaß, K. (2010). Classification scheme for modelling tasks. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31, 285–311.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In A. Gagatsis & S. Papastavridis (Eds.), Mediterranean conference on mathematical education (pp. 115–124). Athens: 3rd Hellenic Mathematical Society and Cyprus Mathematical Society.
Pittman, T. S., Davey, M. E., Alafat, K. A., Wetherill, K. V., & Kramer, N. (1980). Informational versus controlling verbal rewards. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 228–233.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Besser, M., Blum, W., Leiss, D. (2015). How to Support Teachers to Give Feedback to Modelling Tasks Effectively? Results from a Teacher-Training-Study in the Co2CA Project. In: Stillman, G., Blum, W., Salett Biembengut, M. (eds) Mathematical Modelling in Education Research and Practice. International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Modelling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18272-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18272-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18271-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18272-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)