Skip to main content

The Modified Schocket Procedure

  • Chapter
Advanced Glaucoma Surgery

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

  • 1023 Accesses

Abstract

Glaucoma is not infrequently encountered after retinal detachment surgery. Surgical management of glaucoma in eyes with preexisting scleral buckles can be challenging. Trabeculectomy has a high failure rate because poor conjunctival health limits bleb survival, and glaucoma drainage devices have large-sized plates and their implantation is often difficult if a scleral buckle is present. The modification to the original Schocket procedure described by Sidoti and colleagues in which a silicone tube is inserted into the capsule of a preexisting scleral buckle is a good surgical option. This anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band (ACTSEB) is a safe and effective option to control intraocular pressure (IOP) in these cases. Reported success in lowering IOP ranges between 80 and 90 % in published retrospective case series. Reported complications include immediate postoperative hypotony, serous choroidal detachments, conjunctival wound leak, hyphema, and tube obstruction. The use of current glaucoma drainage devices in eyes with preexisting scleral buckles has also been described with comparable outcome and complication rates. The modified Schocket procedure is particularly useful when significant conjunctival and subconjunctival scarring is present in eyes with preexisting scleral buckles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beasley H, Fraunfelder FT. Retinal detachments and topical ocular miotics. Ophthalmology. 1979;86(1):95–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker B, Podos SM. Krukenberg’s spindles and primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;76(5):635–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pape LG, Forbes M. Retinal detachment and miotic therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1978;85(4):558–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Podos SM, Becker B, Morton WR. High myopia and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1966;62(6):1038–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheie HG, Cameron JD. Pigment dispersion syndrome: a clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65(4):264–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barile GR, Chang S, Horowitz JD, Reppucci VS, Schiff WM, Wong DT. Neovascular complications associated with rubeosis iridis and peripheral retinal detachment after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(3):379–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuo N, Takabatake M, Ueno H, Nakayama T, Matsuo T. Photoreceptor outer segments in the aqueous humor in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(6):673–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Meurs JC, Bolt BJ, Mertens DA, Peperkamp E, De Waard P. Rubeosis of the iris in proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Retina. 1996;16(4):292–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang S. LXII Edward Jackson lecture: open angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(6):1033–43. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.02.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Govetto A, Dominguez R, Landaluce ML, Alves MT, Lorente R. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma in vitrectomized eyes: a cross-sectional study. Retina. 2014;34(8):1623–9. doi:10.1097/IAE.0000000000000107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koreen L, Yoshida N, Escariao P, Niziol LM, Koreen IV, Musch DC, Chang S. Incidence of, risk factors for, and combined mechanism of late-onset open-angle glaucoma after vitrectomy. Retina. 2012;32(1):160–7. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e318217fffb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gedde SJ. Management of glaucoma after retinal detachment surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2002;13(2):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bloome MA. Transient angle-closure glaucoma in central retinal vein occlusion. Ann Ophthalmol. 1977;9(1):44–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grant WM. Shallowing of the anterior chamber following occlusion of the central retinal vein. Am J Ophthalmol. 1973;75(3):384–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hook SR, Holladay JT, Prager TC, Goosey JD. Transient myopia induced by sulfonamides. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101(4):495–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hwang JC, Khine KT, Lee JC, Boyer DS, Francis BA. Methyl-sulfonyl-methane (MSM)-induced acute angle closure. J Glaucoma. 2013. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000027.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liang JC, Huamonte FU. Reduction of immediate complications after panretinal photocoagulation. Retina. 1984;4(3):166–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonald PR, Delapaz Jr V, Sarin LK. Nonrhegmatogenous retinal separation with choroidal detachment (uveal effusion). Am J Ophthalmol. 1965;59:820–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mensher JH. Anterior chamber depth alteration after retinal photocoagulation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95(1):113–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryan SJ, Goldberg MF. Anterior segment ischemia following scleral buckling in sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1971;72(1):35–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL. Treatment outcomes in the tube versus trabeculectomy study after one year of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;143(1):9–22. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.07.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Three-year follow-up of the tube versus trabeculectomy study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148(5):670–84. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.06.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gedde SJ, Schiffman JC, Feuer WJ, Herndon LW, Brandt JD, Budenz DL, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Treatment outcomes in the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study after five years of follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(5):789–803. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.10.026. e782.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sidoti PA, Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, Lee PP, Heuer DK. Aqueous tube shunt to a preexisting episcleral encircling element in the treatment of complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(6):1036–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schocket SS, Lakhanpal V, Richards RD. Anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1982;89(10):1188–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schocket SS, Nirankari VS, Lakhanpal V, Richards RD, Lerner BC. Anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma and other refractory glaucomas. A long-term study. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(4):553–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee KS, Sung KR, Na JH, Lee Y, Lee JY, Kim JG, Yoon YH. Clinical results of modified anterior chamber tube shunt to an encircling band surgery for uncontrolled intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 2013;22(2):140–4. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318225b428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Omi CA, De Almeida GV, Cohen R, Mandia Jr C, Kwitko S. Modified Schocket implant for refractory glaucoma. Experience of 55 cases. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(2):211–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sherwood MB, Joseph NH, Hitchings RA. Surgery for refractory glaucoma. Results and complications with a modified Schocket technique. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105(4):562–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Scott IU, Gedde SJ, Budenz DL, Greenfield DS, Flynn Jr HW, Feuer WJ, Mello Jr MO, Krishna R, Godfrey DG. Baerveldt drainage implants in eyes with a preexisting scleral buckle. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(11):1509–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L, Blachley TS, Weizer JS. Baerveldt 250 mm2 glaucoma drainage devices in eyes with preexisting scleral buckles. J Glaucoma. 2014. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000095.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Smith MF, Sherwood MB, McGorray SP. Comparison of the double-plate Molteno drainage implant with the Schocket procedure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110(9):1246–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Luis E. Vazquez and Steven J. Gedde declare that they have no conflict of interest. No human or animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis E. Vazquez M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

12.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Modified Schocket Procedure; Ahmad A. Aref, MD (MPG 75,510 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vazquez, L.E., Gedde, S.J. (2015). The Modified Schocket Procedure. In: Aref, A., Varma, R. (eds) Advanced Glaucoma Surgery. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18060-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18060-1_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18059-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18060-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics