Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidimensional Risk Analysis

  • Chapter
Multicriteria and Multiobjective Models for Risk, Reliability and Maintenance Decision Analysis

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 231))

  • 1924 Accesses

Abstract:

Accidents involve critical consequences that require an appropriate and efficient form of risk management. A multidimensional risk analysis allows a broader view. MCDM/A approaches enable more consistent decision-making, taking into account the DM’s rationality (compensatory or non-compensatory), DM’s behavior regarding risk (prone, neutral or averse) and the uncertainties inherent in the risk context. This chapter presents numerical applications illustrating the use of multicriteria models in two different contexts: a natural gas pipeline and an underground electricity distribution system. Two different MCDM/A approaches are considered: MAUT (Multiattribute Utility Theory) and the ELECTRE TRI outranking method. In the numerical applications, MCDM/A approach steps for building decision models are presented: identifying hazard scenarios, estimating the set of payoffs, eliciting the MAU function (Multi-attribute Utility function), computing the probability function of consequences and estimating multidimensional risk. Loss functions are introduced in the models to calculate the probability distribution functions over the multiple criteria such as impact on humans, and environmental and financial losses. Therefore, Decision Theory concepts are applied to estimate risk in industrial plants and modes of transportation. Finally, other decision problems related to multidimensional risk analysis, using MCDM/A, are considered in different contexts, such as: power electricity systems, natural hazards, risk analysis on counter-terrorism, nuclear power plant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abella EAC, Van Westen CJ (2007) Generation of a landslide risk index map for Cuba using spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Landslides 4:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adey B, Hajdin R, Brühwiler E (2003) Risk-based approach to the determination of optimal interventions for bridges affected by multiple hazards. Eng Struct 25:903–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun I, Kandakoglu A, Ozok AF (2010) Fuzzy integrated vulnerability assessment model for critical facilities in combating the terrorism. Expert Syst Appl 37:3561–3573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alencar MH, Cavalcante CAV, de Almeida AT, Silva Neto CE (2010) Priorities assignment for actions in a transport system based on a multicriteria decision model. In: Bris R, Soares CG, Martorell S (eds) European safety and reliability conference, Prague, September 2009. Reliability, Risk, and Safety: Theory and Applications, Vol. 1–3. 2009. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, p 2480

    Google Scholar 

  • Alencar MH, de Almeida AT (2010) Assigning priorities to actions in a pipeline transporting hydrogen based on a multicriteria decision model. Int J Hydrogen Energy 35(8):3610–3619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alencar MH, Krym EM, Marsaro MF, de Almeida AT (2014) Multidimensional risk evaluation in natural gas pipelines: Environmental aspects observed through a multicriteria decision model. In: Steenbergen RDJM, VanGelder PHAJM, Miraglia S, Vrouwenvelder ACWMT (eds) 22nd Annual Conference on European Safety and Reliability (ESREL), Amsterdam, 2013. Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis: Beyond the Horizon. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, p 758

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida-Filho AT de, de Almeida AT (2010a) Cost-effectiveness analysis and multicriteria approaches: two irreplaceable paradigms for different problems in risk and safety problems. In: Proceedings of the European Safety and Reliability Annual Conference, Rhodes (2010) Reliability. Back to the Future, Risk and Safety, p 2293

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida-Filho AT, de Almeida AT (2010) Multiple dimension risk evaluation framework. In: Bris R, Soares CG, Martorell S (eds) European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), Prague, Czech Republic, 2009. Theory and Applications. CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Reliability, Risk and Safety, p 1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson G, Donalek P, Farmer R et al (2005) Causes of the 2003 major grid blackouts in North America and Europe, and recommended means to improve system dynamic performance. Power Syst IEEE Trans 20:1922–1928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apostolakis GE, Lemon DM (2005) A Screening Methodology for the Identification and Ranking of Infrastructure Vulnerabilities Due to Terrorism. Risk Anal 25:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arianoutsou M, Koukoulas S, Kazanis D (2011) Evaluating Post-Fire Forest Resilience Using GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis: An Example from Cape Sounion National Park, Greece. Environ Manage 47:384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaldos J, Casal J, Montiel H et al (1998) Design of a computer tool for the evaluation of the consequences of accidental natural gas releases in distribution pipes. J Loss Prev Process Ind 11:135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atmaca E, Basar HB (2012) Evaluation of power plants in Turkey using Analytic Network Process (ANP). Energy 44:555–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Renn O (2009) The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk. Risk Anal 29:587–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudouin F (2015) Implementing a Multiple Criteria Model to Debate About Nuclear Power Plants Safety Choices. Gr Decis Negot 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudouin F, Munier B (2009) A revision of industrial risk management: Decisions and experimental tools in risk business. Risk Decis Anal 1:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford T, Cooke R (2001) Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger JO (1985) Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berizzi A (2004) The Italian 2003 blackout. Power Eng Soc Gen Meet 2004 IEEE 1673–1679 Vol. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito AJ, de Almeida AT (2009) Multi-attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):187–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brito AJ, de Almeida AT, Mota CMM (2010) A multicriteria model for risk sorting of natural gas pipelines based on ELECTRE TRI integrating Utility Theory. Eur J Oper Res 200:812–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cailloux O, Mayag B, Meyer P, Mousseau V (2013) Operational tools to build a multicriteria territorial risk scale with multiple stakeholders. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 120:88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catrinu MD, Nordgård DE (2011) Integrating risk analysis and multi-criteria decision support under uncertainty in electricity distribution system asset management. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:663–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comes T, Wijngaards N, Hiete M et al (2011) A Distributed Scenario-Based Decision Support System for Robust Decision-Making in Complex Situations. Int J Inf Syst Cris Response Manag 3:17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox LA Jr (2009) Risk analysis of complex and uncertain systems. Springer Science & Busi-ness Media, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cox LA Jr (2012) Evaluating and Improving Risk Formulas for Allocating Limited Budgets to Expensive Risk-Reduction Opportunities. Risk Anal 32(7):1244–1252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowl DA, Jo Y-D (2007) The hazards and risks of hydrogen. J Loss Prev Process Ind 20:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida AT (2005) Multicriteria Modelling of Repair Contract Based on Utility and ELECTRE I Method with Dependability and Service Quality Criteria. Ann Oper Res 138:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida AT (2007) Multicriteria decision model for outsourcing contracts selection based on utility function and ELECTRE method. Comput Oper Res 34(12):3569–3574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida AT, Ferreira RJP, Cavalcante CAV (2015) A review of multicriteria and multi-objective models in maintenance and reliability problems. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong M, Lou C, Wong C (2008) Adaptive Under-Frequency Load Shedding. Tsinghua Sci Technol 13:823–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziubiński M, Frątczak M, Markowski AS (2006) Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failures of fuel pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19:399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erol İ, Sencer S, Özmen A, Searcy C (2014) Fuzzy MCDM framework for locating a nuclear power plant in Turkey. Energy Policy 67:186–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezell BC, Bennett SP, Von Winterfeldt D et al (2010) Probabilistic Risk Analysis and Terrorism Risk. Risk Anal 30(4):575–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faber MH, Stewart MG (2003) Risk assessment for civil engineering facilities: critical overview and discussion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 80:173–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer Verlag, Boston, Dordrecht, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcez TV, de Almeida AT (2012) Multiple Dimension Manhole Explosion in an Underground Electrical Distribution System. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference (2012) Curran Associates. Inc. Helsinki, Finland, pp 4893–4899

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcez TV, de Almeida AT (2014a) A risk measurement tool for an underground electricity distribution system considering the consequences and uncertainties of manhole events. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 124:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcez TV, de Almeida AT (2014b) Multidimensional Risk Assessment of Manhole Events as a Decision Tool for Ranking the Vaults of an Underground Electricity Distribution System. Power Deliv IEEE Trans 29:624–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcez TV, de Almeida AT (2014c) Multidimensional risk assessment of underground electricity distribution systems based on MAUT. In: Steenbergen RDJM, VanGelder PHAJM, Miraglia S, Vrouwenvelder ACWMT (eds) 22nd Annual Conference on European Safety and Reliability (ESREL), Amsterdam, 2013. Beyond the Horizon. CRC Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis, p 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcez TV, de Almeida-Filho AT, de Almeida AT, Alencar MH, (2010) Multicriteria risk analysis application in a distribution gas pipeline system in Sergipe. In: Bris R, Soares CG, Martorell S (eds) Reliability, risk and safety: theory and applications vols 1–3. European safety and reliability conference (ESREL, (2009) Prague, September 2009. Taylor and Francis 1043–1047

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldermann J, Bertsch V, Treitz M et al (2009) Multi-criteria decision support and evaluation of strategies for nuclear remediation management. Omega 37:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg M, Haas C, Cox LA Jr et al (2012) Ten Most Important Accomplishments in Risk Analysis, 1980–2010. Risk Anal 32(5):771–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guedes Soares CG, Teixeira AP (2001) Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 74(3):299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidar AMA, Mohamed A, Hussain A (2010) Vulnerability control of large scale interconnected power system using neuro-fuzzy load shedding approach. Expert Syst Appl 37:3171–3176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haphuriwat N, Bier VM (2011) Trade-offs between target hardening and overarching protection. Eur J Oper Res 213(1):320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henselwood F, Phillips G (2006) A matrix-based risk assessment approach for addressing linear hazards such as pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19:433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs BF, Meier P (2000) Energy Decisions and the Environment. A guide to the use of multicriteria methods (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong S, Bradshaw CJA, Brook BW (2013) Evaluating options for the future energy mix of Japan after the Fukushima nuclear crisis. Energy Policy 56:418–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEEE1584 (2002) IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Hazard Calculations. IEEE Std 1584-2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo Y-D, Ahn BJ (2002) Analysis of hazard areas associated with high-pressure natural-gas pipelines. 2 J Loss Prev Process Ind 15:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Jo Y-D, Ahn BJ (2005) A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. J Hazard Mater 123:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo Y-D, Crowl DA (2008) Individual risk analysis of high-pressure natural gas pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 21:589–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jozi A, Pouriyeh A (2011) Health-safety and environmental risk assessment of power plants using multi criteria decision making method. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 17:437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karvetski CW, Lambert JH, Keisler JM, Linkov I (2011) Integration of Decision Analysis and Scenario Planning for Coastal Engineering and Climate Change. Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Humans, IEEE Trans 41(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadam IM, Kaluarachchi JJ (2003) Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:683–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonce AM, Apostolakis GE, Cook BK (2008) Bulk power risk analysis: Ranking infrastructure elements according to their risk significance. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 30:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung M, Lambert JH, Mosenthal A (2004) A Risk-Based Approach to Setting Priorities in Protecting Bridges Against Terrorist Attacks. Risk Anal 24(4):963–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy J (2005) Multiple criteria decision making and decision support systems for flood risk management. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 19:438–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares P (2002) Multiple criteria decision making and risk analysis as risk management tools for power systems planning. Power Syst IEEE Trans 17:895–900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G et al (2006) From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: Recent developments and applications. Environ Int 32:1072–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Steevens J et al (2007) Multi-criteria decision analysis and environmental risk assessment for nanomaterials. J Nanoparticle Res 9:543–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lins PHC, de Almeida AT (2012) Multidimensional risk analysis of hydrogen pipelines. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:13545–13554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes YG, de Almeida AT, Alencar MH, Wolmer Filho LAF, Siqueira GBA (2010) A Decision Support System to Evaluate Gas Pipeline Risk in Multiple Dimensions. In: Bris R, Soares CG, Martorell S (eds) European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), Prague, Czech Republic, 2009. Theory and Applications. Crc Press-Taylor & Francis Group, Reliability, Risk and Safety, p 1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria P, Aspinall PA (2003) Evaluating a multi-criteria model for hazard assessment in urban design. The Porto Marghera case study. Environ Impact Assess Rev 23:625–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merad MM, Verdel T, Roy B, Kouniali S (2004) Use of multi-criteria decision-aids for risk zoning and management of large area subjected to mining-induced hazards. Tunn Undergr Sp Technol 19:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrick JRW, Leclerc P (2014) Modeling Adversaries in Counterterrorism Decisions Using Prospect Theory. Risk Anal. doi:10.1111/risa.12254

    Google Scholar 

  • Montiel LV, Bickel JE (2014) A Generalized Sampling Approach for Multilinear Utility Functions Given Partial Preference Information. Decis Anal 11(3):147–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MG, Florig HK, DeKay ML, Fischbeck P (2000) Categorizing Risks for Risk Ranking. Risk Anal 20:49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mousseau V, Slowinski R (1998) Inferring an ELECTRE TRI Model from Assignment Examples. J Glob Optim 12:157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nefeslioglu HA, Sezer EA, Gokceoglu C, Ayas Z (2013) A modified analytical hierarchy process (M-AHP) approach for decision support systems in natural hazard assessments. Comput Geosci 59:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nganje W, Bier V, Han H, Zack L (2008) Terrorist Threats to Food: Guidance for Establishing and Strengthening Prevention and Response Systems. Am J Agric Econ 90(5):1265–1271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papamichail KN, French S (2013) 25 Years of MCDA in nuclear emergency management. IMA J Manag Math pp 481–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlak AI, Lambert JH, Guterbock TM, Clements JL (2012) Population behavioral scenarios influencing radiological disaster preparedness and planning. Accid Anal Prev 48:353–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parnell GS, Smith CM, Moxley FI (2010) Intelligent Adversary Risk Analysis: A Bioterrorism Risk Management Model. Risk Anal 30:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson SA, Apostolakis GE (2007) Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:1183–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radeva A, Rudin C, Passonneau R, Isaac D (2009) Report Cards for Manholes: Eliciting Expert Feedback for a Learning Task. Mach Learn Appl 2009 ICMLA ’09 Int Conf 719–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa H (1968) Decision analysis: introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Addison-Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Regős G (2013) Comparison of power plants’ risks with multi criteria decision models. Cent Eur J Oper Res 21:845–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaian S, Jozi SA (2012) Health- Safety and Environmental Risk Assessment of Refineries Using of Multi Criteria Decision Making Method. APCBEE Procedia 3:235–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogner H-H (2013) World outlook for nuclear power. Energy Strateg Rev 1:291–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1996) Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. Springer US

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin C, Passonneau R, Radeva A et al (2010) A process for predicting manhole events in Manhattan. Mach Learn 80:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin C, Passonneau RJ, Radeva A et al (2011) 21st-century data miners meet 19th-century electrical cables. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 44:103–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudin C, Waltz D, Anderson RN et al (2012) Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid. Pattern Anal Mach Intell IEEE Trans 34:328–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvi O, Merad M, Rodrigues N (2005) Toward an integrative approach of the industrial risk management process in France. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18:414–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scawthorn C (2008) A Brief History of Seismic Risk Assessment. In: Bostrom A, French S, Gottlieb S (eds) Risk Assessment. Model. Decis. Support. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 5–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan X, Zhuang J (2014) Subsidizing to disrupt a terrorism supply chain-a four-player game. J Oper Res Soc 65(7):1108–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shetty NK, Chubb MS, Halden D (1997) An overall risk-based assessment procedure for substandard bridges. In: Das PC (ed) Saf. Bridg. Telford, London, Uk, pp 225–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H et al (2007) Laypeople’s and Experts’ Perception of Nano-technology Hazards. Risk Anal 27:59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sklavounos S, Rigas F (2006) Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sri Bhashyam S, Montibeller G (2012) Modeling State-Dependent Priorities of Malicious Agents. Decis Anal 9:172–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanidis S, Stathis D (2013) Assessment of flood hazard based on natural and anthropogenic factors using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Nat Hazards 68:569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura H, Yamamoto K, Tomiyama S, Hatono I (2000) Modeling and analysis of decision making problem for mitigating natural disaster risks. Eur J Oper Res 122:461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topuz E, Talinli I, Aydin E (2011) Integration of environmental and human health risk assessment for industries using hazardous materials: A quantitative multi criteria approach for environmental decision makers. Environ Int 37:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tweeddale M (2003) Managing Risk and Reliability of Process Plants. Gulf Professional Publishing, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Vadrevu K, Eaturu A, Badarinath KVS (2010) Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis—a case study. Environ Monit Assess 166:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vleuten E, Lagendijk V (2010) Transnational infrastructure vulnerability: The historical shaping of the 2006 European “Blackout.”. Energy Policy 38:2042–2052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincke P (1992) Multicriteria Decision-Aid. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi WK (2009) Valuing risks of death from terrorism and natural disasters. J Risk Uncertain 38:191–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh BP, Black WZ (2005) Thermodynamic and mechanical analysis of short circuit events in an underground vault. Power Deliv IEEE Trans 20:2235–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J (2006) Maritime Risk Assessment and its Current Status. Qual Reliab Eng Int 22(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y-M, Liu J, Elhag TMS (2008) An integrated AHP–DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Comput Ind Eng 54:513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis HH, DeKay ML, Fischhoff B, Morgan MG (2005) Aggregate, Disaggregate, and Hybrid Analyses of Ecological Risk Perceptions. Risk Anal 25:405–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoe C (2012) Principles of Risk Analysis – Decision Making under uncertainty. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil

    Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio Cavalcante, Marcelo Hazin Alencar, Rodrigo José Pires Ferreira, Adiel Teixeira de Almeida-Filho & Thalles Vitelli Garcez

Authors
  1. Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cristiano Alexandre Virgínio Cavalcante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcelo Hazin Alencar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rodrigo José Pires Ferreira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Adiel Teixeira de Almeida-Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thalles Vitelli Garcez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Almeida, A.T., Cavalcante, C.A.V., Alencar, M.H., Ferreira, R.J.P., de Almeida-Filho, A.T., Garcez, T.V. (2015). Multidimensional Risk Analysis. In: Multicriteria and Multiobjective Models for Risk, Reliability and Maintenance Decision Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17969-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation