Skip to main content

Copulatory and Post-copulatory Sexual Selection in Haplogyne Spiders, with Emphasis on Pholcidae and Oonopidae

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cryptic Female Choice in Arthropods

Abstract

Cryptic female choice (CFC) in spiders may involve several mechanisms to bias paternity including early termination of copulation, remating likelihood, and sperm dumping . In Pholcidae , these mechanisms seem to be very common and will be examined in the present chapter. In the Pholcidae Physocyclus globosus , sperm dumping involves an active role of the female. In contrast, in the Pholcidae Holocnemus pluchei , sperm mass ejection during copulation is mainly under male control. In another haplogyne spider, the Oonopidae Opopaea fosuma , females are able to influence male’s chances of rearing their offspring by also exerting CFC by sperm dumping. Among pholcids, rhythmic genitalic movements of the pedipalps (squeezes ) during copulation have been interpreted as genitalic copulatory courtship . Additionally, recent studies have evaluated the possibility that the outcome of male–female copulatory communication affects paternity. Future attention to the behavior of both female and male, and to the possible dialogues during copulation, promises to be a valuable tool in understanding sexual interactions in these spiders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberti G, Michalik P (2004) Feinstrukturelle Aspekte der Fortpflanzungssysteme von Spinnentieren (Arachnida). In: Thaler K (ed) Diversit¨at und Biologie von Webspinnen, Skorpionen und anderen Spinnentieren, vol 12. Denisia, pp 1–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1994) Post-insemination associations between male and female insects: the mate guarding hypothesis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander RD, Marshall D, Cooley J (1997) Evolutionary perspectives on insect mating. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 4–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Simmons L (2006) Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 21(6):296–302

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrés J, Cordero Rivera A (2000) Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice? Anim Behav 59:695–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G (2014) Cryptic female choice. In: Shuker DM, Simmons LW (eds) The evolution of insect mating systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (1995) Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 261:123–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2002) Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects. Nature 415:787–789

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Jones T, Elgar M (2003) Reversal of sex roles in nuptial feeding. Nature 424:387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austad S (1984) Evolution of sperm priority patterns in spiders. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 223–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Baena ML, Eberhard WG (2007) Appearances deceive: female “resistance” in a sepsid fly is not a test of male ability to hold on. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:27–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa F (2009) Cryptic female choice by female control of oviposition timing in a soldier fly. Behav Ecol 20:957–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker DM (1994) Copulatory plugs and paternity assurance in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Anim Behav 48:147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrantes G, Ramírez MJ (2013) Courtship, egg sac construction, and maternal care in Kukulcania hibernalis, with information on the courtship of Misionella mendensis (Araneae, Filistatidae). Arachnology 16(2):72–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1992) Sperm competition in birds: evolutionary causes and consequences. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Møller AP (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanckenhorn WU, Muhlhauser C, Morf C, Reusch T, Reuter M (2000) Female choice, female reluctance to mate and sexual selection on body size in the dung fly Sepsis cynipsea. Ethology 95:466–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Brignoli PM (1978) Some remarks on the relationships between the Haplogynae, the Semientelegynae and the Cribellatae (Araneae). Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski TC, Christenson TE (1997) Mating in the orbweaving spider Micrathena gracilis—II. Factors influencing copulation and sperm release and storage. Anim Behav 53:381–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M (2007) Sperm dumping in a haplogyne spider. J Zool 273:74–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M (2008) Functional genital morphology of armored spiders (Arachnida: Araneae: Tetrablemmidae). J Morphol 269:1073–1094

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M (2009) Female genitalia of goblin spiders (Arachnida: Araneae: Oonopidae): a morphological study with functional implications. Invertebr Biol 128:340–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M (2010) Complex female genitalia indicate sperm dumping in armored goblin spiders (Arachnida, Araneae, Oonopidae). Zoology 113:19–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Kropf C (2007) Genital morphology of the haplogyne spider Harpactea lepida (Arachnida, Araneae, Dysderidae). Zoomorphology 126:45–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Nentwig W, Kropf C (2002) Opopaea fosuma, n. sp. from Sumatra, Indonesia (Araneae, Oonopidae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc 12:244–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Nentwig W, Kropf C (2003) Complex genital structures indicate cryptic female choice in a haplogyne spider (Arachnida, Araneae, Oonopidae, Gamasomorphinae). J Morphol 255:80–93

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Jacob A, Kropf C (2006a) Copulatory behavior and web of Indicoblemma lannaianum from Thailand (Arachnida, Araneae, Tetrablemmidae). J Arachnol 34:176–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Graber W, Michalik P, Kropf C (2006b) Silhouettella loricatula (Arachnida, Araneae, Oonopidae): a haplogyne spider with complex female genitalia. J Morphol 267:663–677

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Michalik P, Graber W, Jacob A, Nentwig W, Kropf C (2006c) Complex genital system of a haplogyne spider (Arachnida, Araneae, Tetrablemmidae) indicates internal fertilization and full female control over transferred sperm. J Morphol 267:166–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burger M, Izquierdo M, Carrera P (2010) Female genital morphology and mating behavior of Orchestina (Arachnida: Araneae: Oonopidae). Zoology 113:100–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calbacho-Rosa L (2012) L. Calbacho-Rosa, PhD Dissertation Thesis: Patrones de Selección Sexual en arañas Pholcidae: comportamiento sexual y procesos asociados. Tesis doctoral. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina

    Google Scholar 

  • Calbacho-Rosa L, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Peretti A (2010) Occurrence and duration of post-copulatory mate guarding in a spider with last sperm precedence. Behaviour 147:1267–1283

    Google Scholar 

  • Calbacho-Rosa L, Galicia-Mendoza I, Dutto MS, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Peretti AV (2013) Copulatory behavior in a pholcid spider: males use specialized genitalic movements for sperm removal and copulatory courtship. Naturwissenschaften 100:407–416

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carazo P, Font E (2010) Putting information back into biological communication. J Evol Biol 23:661–669

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T (2006) Evolutionary conflicts of interest between males and females. Curr Biol 16:744–754

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T, Arnquist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003) Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18:41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng LI, Howard RW, Campbell JG, Charlton RE, Nechols JR, Ramaswamy SB (2004) Mating behavior of Cephalonomia tarsalis (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) and the effect of female mating frequency on offspring production. J Insect Behav 17:227–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero C, Eberhard WG (2003) Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a critical review of some current research. J Evol Biol 16:1–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cordero C, Eberhard WG (2005) Interaction between sexually antagonistic selection and mate choice in the evolution of female response to male traits. Evol Ecol 19:111–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A (1999) Male copulatory sensory stimulation induces female ejection of rival sperm in a damselfly. Proc R Soc Lond 266:779–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A (2006) Sperm ejection as a possible cryptic female choice mechanism in Odonata (Insecta). Physiol Entomol 31:146–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba-Aguilar A, Uhía E, Cordero Rivera A (2003) Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals’ sperm displacement. J Zool Lond 261:381–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan D (1991) The solitary and presocial Vespidae. In: Ross KG, Matthews RW (eds) The social biology of wasps. Comstock, Ithaca, pp 33–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Crudgington HS, Siva-Jothy MT (2000) Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407:855–856

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex (reprinted). Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov D, Hormiga G (2009) Revision and cladistic analysis of the orbweaving spider genus Cyrtognatha Keyserling, 1881 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 317:1–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov D, Alvarez-Padilla F, Hormiga G (2007) The female genital morphology of the orb weaving spider genus Agriognatha (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). J Morphol 268:758–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drengsgaard IL, Toft S (1999) Sperm competition in a nuptial feeding spider, Pisaura mirabilis. Behaviour 136:877–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutto MS (2006) Análisis funcional del comportamiento de estridulación en Holocnemus pluchei (Scopoldi) (Araneae: Pholcidae) femenino. Graduation thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina, p 56

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutto MS, Calbacho-Rosa L, Peretti A (2011) Signalling and sexual conflict: female spiders use stridulation to inform males of sexual receptivity. Ethology 117:1040–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W (2001) Species-specific genitalic copulatory courtship in sepsid flies (Diptera, Sepsidae, Microsepsis) and theories of genitalic evolution. Evolution 55(1):93−102

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1985) Sexual selection and animal genitalia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1991) Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in insects. Biol Rev 66:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1994) Evidence for widespread courtship during copulation in 131 species of insects and spiders, and implications for cryptic female choice. Evolution 48:711–733

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2002) The function of female resistance behavior: intromission by male coercion vs. female cooperation in sepsid flies (Diptera: Sepsidae). Rev Biol Trop 50:485–505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2004) Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution 58:1947–1970

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2005) Sexually reversed copulatory courtship roles and possible nuptial feeding in the soldier beetle Ditemnus acantholabus (Coleoptera, Cantharidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 79:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2006) Sexually antagonistic coevolution in insects is associated with only limited morphological diversity. J Evol Biol 19:657–681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2009) Post-copulatory sexual selection: Darwin’s omission and its consequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10025–10032

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (2011) Experiments with genitalia: a commentary. Trends Ecol Evol 26:17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Cordero C (1995) Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products—a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends Ecol Evol 10:493–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Huber BA (2010) Spider genitalia: precise maneuvers with a numb structure in a complex lock.In: Leonard JL, Cordoba-Aguilar A (eds) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 249–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Guzmán-Gómez S, Catley KM (1993) Correlation between spermathecal morphology and mating systems in spiders. Biol J Linn Soc 50:197–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Bernhard B, Huber BA, Rodríguez R, Briceno D, Salas I, Rodríguez V (1998) One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52:415–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard W, Rodríguez RL, Polihronakis M (2009) Pitfalls in understanding the functional significance of genital allometry. J Evol Biol 22:435–445

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson M, Arnqvist G (2000) Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:559–563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1995) Copulation duration in spiders: comparative patterns. Rec. WA Mus 51:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgar MA (1998) Sperm competition and sexual selection in spiders and other arachnids. In: Birkhead TR, Møller AP (eds) Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, London, pp 307–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt U (1921) Vergleichende Studien über die Morphologie des männlichen Tasters und die Biologie der Kopulation der Spinnen. Arch. Naturgesc 87(A, 4):78–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt U (1923) Weitere sexualbiologische Untersuchungen an Spinnen. Arch. Naturgesellschaft 90:85–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt U (1924) Weitere Studien über die Biologie der Spinnen. Archiv für. Naturgeschichte 90:85–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt U (1927) Neue biologische Untersuchungen an einheimischen und ausländischen Spinnen. Z Morphol Oekol Tiere 8:96–186

    Google Scholar 

  • González M, Costa F (2008) Persistence of sexual reluctance in mated females and the importance of regular copulation in a wolf spider. Ethol Ecol Evol 20:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Gónzalez-Soriano E, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2003) Sexual behaviour in Paraphlebia quinta Calvert: male dimorphism and a possible example of female control (Zygoptera: Megapodagrionidae). Odonatologica 32:345–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold CE, Coddington JA, Hormiga G, Scharff N (1998) Phylogeny of the orb web building spiders (Araneomorphae, Orbiculariae: Deinopoidea, Araneoidea). Zool J Linn Soc 123:1–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass B (1990) A quantitative study of insemination and gamete efficiency in different species of the Rhabditis strongyloides group (Nematoda). Invertebr Reprod Dev 18:205–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellriegel B, Ward PI (1998) Complex female reproductive tract morphology: its possible use in postcopulatory female choice. J Theor Biol 190:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoikkala A, Crossley S (2000) Copulatory courtship in Drosophila: behavior and songs of D. birchii and D. serrata. J Insect Behav 13:71–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland B, Rice WR (1999) Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic coevolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 96:5083–5088

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hosken D, Stockley P (2003) Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:87–93

    Google Scholar 

  • House CM, Simmons LW (2003) Genital morphology and fertilization success in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus: an example of sexually selected male genitalia. Proc Roy Soc B 278:447–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1993a) Genital mechanics and sexual selection in the spider Nesticus cellulanus (Araneae: Nesticidae). Can J Zool 71:2437–2447

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1993b) Female choice and spider genitalia. Bolletino dell’ Accademia Gioenia di Scienze Naturali (Catania) 26:209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1994) Genital morphology, copulatory mechanism and reproductive biology in Psilochorus simoni (Berland, 1911) (Pholcidae; Araneae). Neth J Zool 44:85–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1995) Copulatory mechanism in Holocnemus pluchei and Pholcus opilionoides, with notes on male cheliceral apophyses and stridulatory organs in Pholcidae (Araneae). Acta Zool. Stockholm 76:291–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1996) Genitalia, fluctuating asymmetry, and patterns of sexual selection in Physocyclus globosus (Araneae, Pholcidae). Rev Suisse Zool (Suppl.):289–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1997) Evidence for gustatorial courtship in a haplogyne spider (Hedypsilus culicinus: Pholcidae: Araneae). Neth J Zool 47(1):95–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1998a) Spider reproductive behaviour: a review of Gerhardt’s work from 1911-1933, with implications for sexual selection. Bull Br arachnol Soc 11(3):81–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1998b) Genital mechanics in some Neotropical pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae), with implications for systematics. J Zool London 244:587–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (1999) Sexual selection in pholcid spiders (Araneae, Pholcidae): artful chelicerae and forceful genitalia. J Arachnol 27:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2000) New World pholcid spiders (Araneae: Pholcidae): a revision at generic level. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 254:1–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2002a) Functional morphology of the genitalia in the spider Spermophora senoculata (Pholcidae, Araneae). Zool Anz 241:105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2002b) Functional Morphology of the Genitalia in the Spider Spermophora senoculata (Pholcidae, Araneae). Zool Anz 241:105–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2003a) Rapid evolution and species-specificity of arthropod genitalia: fact or artifact? Org Divers Evol 3:63–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2003b) Southern African pholcid spiders: revision and cladistic analysis of Quamtana gen. Nov. and Spermophora Hentz (Araneae: Pholcidae), with notes on male-female covariation. Zool J Linn Soc 139:477–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2004) Evidence for functional segregation in the directionally asymmetric male genitalia of the spider Metagonia mariguitarensis (González-Sponga) (Pholcidae: Araneae). J Zool Lond 262:317–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2005) Sexual selection research on spiders: progress and biases. Biol Rev 80:363–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA (2006) Cryptic female exaggeration: the asymmetric female internal genitalia of Kaliana yuruani (Araneae: Pholcidae). J Morphol 267:705–712

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA, Eberhard WG (1997) Courtship, copulation, and genital mechanics in Physocyclus globosus (Araneae, Pholcidae). Can J Zool 75:905–918

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber BA, Brescovit AD, Rheims CA (2005) Exaggerated female genitalia in two new spider species (Araneae: Pholcidae), with comments on genital evolution by female choice versus antagonistic coevolution. Insect Syst Evol 36:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries DA (1967) The mating of the hen flea Certophyllus gallinae (Schrank) (Siphonaptera: Insecta). Anim Behav 15:82–90

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamimura Y (2000) Possible removal of rival sperm by the elongated genitalia of the earwig, Euborellia plebeja. Zool Sci 17:667–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamimura Y (2005) Last-male paternity of Euborellia plebeja, an earwig with elongated genitalia and sperm removal behavior. J Ethol 23:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaster JL, Jakob EM (1997) Last-male sperm priority in a haplogyne spider (Araneae: Pholcidae): correlations between female morphology and patterns of sperm usage. Ann Entomol Soc Am 90:254–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CD, Jennions MD (2011) Sexual selection and sperm quantity: meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation. Biol Rev 86:863–884

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King BH, Fischer CR (2005) Males mate guard in absentia through extended effects of postcopulatory courtship in a parasitoid wasp Spalangia endius (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J Insect Physiol 51:1340–1345

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knoflach B, van Harten A (2000) Palpal loss, single palp copulation and obligatory mate consumption in Tidarren cuneolatum(Tullgren, 1910) (Araneae, Theridiidae). J Nat Hist 34:1639–1659

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotrba M (1996) Sperm transfer by spermatophore in Diptera: new results from the Diopsidae. Zool J Linn Soc 117:305–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus O (1984) Male spider genitalia: evolutionary changes in structure and function. Verh Naturwiss Ver Hamburg 27:373–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre R (1963) L’audition et l’e’mision de sons chez les Araneides. Ann Biol 2:371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard J, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2010) The evolution of primary characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi HW (1967) Predatory and sexual behavior of the spider Sicarius (Araneae: Sicariidae). Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Canbridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Manrique G, Lazzari CR (1994) Sexual behaviour and stridulation during mating in Triatoma infestans (Hemiptera: Reduviidae). Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 89:629–633

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcotte M, Delisle J, McNeil JN (2005) Impact of male mating history on the temporal sperm dynamics of Choristoneura rosaceana and C. fumiferana females. J Insect Physiol 51:537–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin OY, Hosken DJ (2004) Copulation reduces male but not female longevity in Saltella sphondylli (Diptera: Sepsidae). J Evol Biol 17:357–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masumoto T (1993) The effect of the copulatory plug in the funnel-web spider, Agelena limbata (Araneae: Agelenidae). J Arachnol 21:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalik P, Reiher W, Tintelnot-Suhm M, Coyle FA, Alberti G (2005) Female genital system of the folding trapdoor spider Antrodiaetus unicolor (Hentz, 1842) (Antrodiaetidae, Araneae): ultrastructural study of form and function with notes on reproductive biology of spiders. J Morphol 263:284–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Michiels NK (1989) Morphology of male and female genitalia in Sympetrum danae (Sulzer), with special reference to the mechanism of sperm removal during copulation (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 18:21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery TH (1903) Studies on the habits of spiders, particularly those of the mating period. Proc Acad Nat Sci Phila 55:59–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Naud MJ, Hanlon RT, Hall KC, Shaw PW, Havenhand JN (2004) Behavioural and genetic assessment of reproductive success in a spawning aggregation of the Australian giant cuttlefish, Sepia apama. Anim Behav 67:1043–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill K (2001) Solitary wasps behavior and natural history. Comstock, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono T, Siva-Jothy MT, Kato A (1989) Removal and subsequent ingestion of rivals’ semen during copulation in a tree cricket. Physiol Entomol 14:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Otronen M (1990) Mating behavior and sperm competition in the fly, Dryomyza anilis. Behav Ecol Socbiol 26:349–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Otronen M (1997) Variation in sperm precedence during mating in male flies, Dryomyza anilis. Anim Behav 53:1233–1240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otronen M, Siva-Jothy MT (1991) The effect of postcopulatory male behaviour on ejaculate distribution with in the female sperm storage organs of the fly, Dryomyza anilis (Diptera: Dryomyzidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 29:33–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1984) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, London, pp 1–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (2006) Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361:235–259

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peretti AV, Aisenberg A (2011) Communication under sexual selection hypotheses: challenging prospects for future studies under extreme sexual conflict. Acta ethol. doi:10.1007/s10211-011-0099-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretti AV, Córdoba-Aguilar A (2007) Sexual conflict over mating: on the value of fine-scaled behavioral observations for studies on sexual coercion. Ethol Ecol Evol 19:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretti AV, Eberhard WG (2010) Cryptic female choice via sperm dumping favours male copulatory courtship in a spider. J Evol Biol 23:271–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peretti AV, Willemart RH (2007) Sexual coercion does not exclude luring behavior in the climbing camel-spider Oltacola chacoensis (Arachnida, Solifugae, Ammotrechidae). J Ethol 25:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretti AV, Eberhard WG, Briceño D (2006) Copulatory dialogue: female spiders sing during copulation to influence male genitalic movements. Anim Behav 72:413–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilastro A, Scaggiante M, Rasotto MB (2002) Individual adjustment of sperm expenditure accords with sperm competition theory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:9913–9915

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T, Birkhead TR (2000) Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature 405:787–789

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Platnick NI, Forster RR (1989) A revision of the South American and Australasian spiders of the family Anapidae (Araneae, Araneoidea). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 190:1–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehfeld VK, Sudhaus W (1985) Comparative studies of sexual behavior of two sibling species of Rhabditis (Nematoda). Zool Jb Syst 112:435–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendall D, Owren MJ, Ryan MJ (2009) What do animal signals mean? Anim Behav 78:233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezác M (2008) Description of Harpactea sadistica n. sp. (Araneae: Dysderidae) a haplogyne spider with reduced female genitalia. Zootaxa 1698:65–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezác M (2014) The spider Harpactea sadistica: co-evolution of traumatic insemination and complex female genital morphology in spiders. Proc R Soc B 276:2697–2701

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley M (1989) The incidence of sperm displacement in insects: four conjectures, one corroboration. Biol J Linn Soc 30:349–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridsdill Smith TJ (1970) The behaviour of Hemithynnus hyalinatus (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae), with notes on some other Thynnine. J Aust Entomol Soc 9:196–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez V (1995) Relation of flagellum length to reproductive success in male Chelymorpha alternans Boheman (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cassidinae). Coleopt Bull 49(3):201–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez RL (1998) Possible female choice during copulation in Ozophora baranowskii (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae): female behavior, multiple copulations, and sperm transfer. J Insect Behav 11:725–741

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez V, Windsor DM, Eberhard WG (2004) Tortoise beetle genitalia and demonstration of a sexually selected advantage for flagellum length in Chelymorpha alternans (Chrysomelidae, Cassidini, Stolaini). In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay JA, Schmitt M (eds) New developments in the biology of chrysomelidae. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 739–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Márquez I, Peretti AV (2010) Intersexual cooperation during male clasping of external female genitalia in the spider Physocyclus dugesi (Araneae, Pholcidae). J Ethol 28:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe L (1992) Convenience polyandry in a water strider: foraging conflicts and female control of copulation frequency and guarding duration. Anim Behav 44:189–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer MA, Uhl G (2002) Determinants of paternity success in the spider Pholcus phalangioides (Pholcidae: Araneae): the role of male and female mating behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:368–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer MA, Misof B, Uhl G (2008) Effects of body size of both sexes and female mating history on male behaviour and paternity success in a spider. Anim Behav 76:75–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JM, Lubin Y (1998) Intersexual conflict in spiders. Oikos 83:496–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JM, Thomas ML, Elgar MA (2001) Ectomised conductors in the golden orb-web spider, Nephila plumipes (Araneoidea): a male adaptation to sexual conflict? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:410–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Bergman T, Fischer J, Zuberbühler K, Hammerschmidt K (2010) The central importance of information in studies of animal communication. Anim Behav 80:3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Shillington C, Verrell P (1997) Sexual strategies of a North American ‘tarantula’ (Araneae: Theraphosidae). Ethology 103:588–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon E (1893) Histoire Naturelledes Araigne’ es, vol.1, part 2. Roret, Paris, pp 257–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RL (1984) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snook RR, Hosken DJ (2004) Sperm death and dumping in Drosophila. Nature 428:939–941

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snow LSE, Andrade MCB (2005) Multiple sperm storage organs facilitate female control of paternity. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:1139–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Solensky MJ, Oberhauser KS (2009) Male monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, adjust ejaculates in response to intensity of sperm competition. Anim Behav 77:465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefania V, Garciaa K, Vecchiaa C, Silva LA, Guimarãesa B, Tizo-Pedrosoc E, Machado de EO, Brescovit AD, Del-Clarof K (2012) Mating behaviour, nympho-imaginal development and description of a new Mesabolivar species (Araneae: Pholcidae) from the Brazilian dry forest. J Nat Hist 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallamy DW, Darlington MB, Pesk JP, Powell BE (2003) Copulatory courtship signals male genetic quality in cucumber beetles. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:77–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Hylobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765–788

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Alcock J (1983) The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, Stratton GE (1982) Acoustic communication and reproductive isolation in spiders. In: Witt PN, Rovner JS (eds) Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 123–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G (1993) Mating behaviour and female sperm storage in Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin) (Araneae). Mem Queens Mus 33:667–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G (1994) Genital morphology and sperm storage in Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) (Pholcidae; Araneae). Acta Zool Stockholm 75:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G (2000) Two distinctly different sperm storage organs in female Dysdera erythrina (Araneae: Dysderidae). Arthropod Struct Dev 29:163–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G (2002) Female genital morphology and sperm priority patterns in spiders (Araneae). In: Toft S, Scharff N (eds) European arachnology 2000. Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, pp 145–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Schimtt M (1996) Stridulation in Palpimanus gibbulus Dufour (Araneae: Palpimanidae). Rev Suisse Zool (Suppl):649–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Schmitt S, Schäfer M (2005) Fitness benefits of multiple mating versus female mate choice in the cellar spider (Pholcus phalangioides). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 59:69–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Vollrath F (1998) Genital morphology of Nephila edulis: implications for sperm competition in spiders. Can J Zool 76:39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl G, Huber BA, Rose W (1995) Male pedipalp morphology and copulatory mechanism in Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) (Araneae, Pholcidae). Bull Br Arachnol Soc 10:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • van Helsdingen PJ (1969) A reclassification of the species of Linyphia Latreille based on the functioning of the genitalia (Araneida, Linyphiidae). Part I. Linyphia Latreille and Neriene Blackwell. Zool Verh 105:1–303

    Google Scholar 

  • van Helsdingen PJ (1972) The function of genitalia as a useful taxonomic character. Arachn Congr Int V Brno 1971:123–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage JK (1979) Dual function of the damselfly penis: sperm removal and transfer. Science 203:916–918

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wada T, Takegaki T, Mori T, Natsukari Y (2006) Reproductive behavior of the Japanese spineless cuttlefish Sepiella japonica. Venus 65:221–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada T, Takegaki T, Mori T, Natsukari Y (2010) Sperm removal, ejaculation and their behavioral interaction in male cuttlefish in response to female mating history. Anim Behav 79:613–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker WF (1980) Sperm utilization strategies in nonsocial insects. Am Nat 115:78–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1990) Female-enhanced male competition determines the first mate and principal sire in the spider Linyphia litigiosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson PJ (1991) Multiple paternity as genetic bet-hedging in female sierra dome spiders, Linyphia litigiosa (Linyphiidae). Anim Behav 41:343–360

    Google Scholar 

  • West HP, Toft S (1999) Last-male sperm priority and the mating system of the haplogyne spider Tetragnatha extensa (Araneae: Tetragnathidae). J Insect Behav 12:433–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiehle H (1967) Metaeine semi entelegyne Gattung der Araneae. Senckenbergiana Biol 48:183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuk M, Simmons LW (1997) Reproductive strategies of the crickets (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of mating strategies in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 89–109

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Bernhard Huber and Mathias Burger for photographs, Anita Aisenberg, Ignacio Escalante, and Fernando G. Costa for useful suggestions on the manuscript, and the Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), FONCYT, and SECYT-UNC for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucía Calbacho-Rosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Calbacho-Rosa, L., Peretti, A.V. (2015). Copulatory and Post-copulatory Sexual Selection in Haplogyne Spiders, with Emphasis on Pholcidae and Oonopidae. In: Peretti, A., Aisenberg, A. (eds) Cryptic Female Choice in Arthropods. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17894-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics