Abstract
Many of today’s infrastructures, such as railways and electricity utilities, originate from the 1800s and evolved into public services with centralized bureaucratic operations subject to government regulation, termed large-scale technical systems (LTS). In contrast, inverse infrastructures are user-driven, self-organizing infrastructures with decentralized governance where development is influenced from the bottom-up. In this chapter, a longitudinal review of peer-reviewed SDI research is presented in search of signs of inverse infrastructures in SDIs and SDI research. The quantitative review showed that SDI research publications increased dramatically during the last decade. Predominantly, SDIs are researched empirically and the majority of publications focus on technology prototypes and proof-of-concept implementations. Research on “soft” aspects of SDIs and case study approaches are much less well represented, and conceptual and theoretical studies receive the least attention. Publications about SDI initiatives spanning multiple countries have increased, while the number of publications from the local or municipal perspective is converging to zero. The last few years have also seen a huge increase in SDI literature in the earth observation domain. A qualitative review of the literature further shows that SDIs are evolving from top-down, centralized government funded initiatives into decentralized and bottom-up initiatives, but most SDIs are not yet self-organizing and user-driven systems. The findings suggest that cartographers and researchers concerned with SDI should pay more attention to the development of standards and software tools in support of self-organizing and user-driven SDIs, as well as appropriate governance mechanisms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alavi M, Carlson P (1992) A review of MIS research and disciplinary development. J Manage Inf Syst 8(4):45–62
Béjar R, Latre MÁ, Nogueras-Iso J, Muro-Medrano PR, Zarazaga-Soria FJ (2009) Systems of systems as a conceptual framework for spatial data infrastructures. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4:201–217
Bennett R, Wallace J, Williamson IP (2008) A toolbox for mapping and managing new interests over land. Survey Rev 40(307):43–53
Borzacchiello MT, Craglia M (2012) Estimating benefits of spatial data infrastructures: a case study on e-cadastres. Comput Environ Urban Syst 41:276–288
Çaǧdaş V, Stubkjær E (2011) Design research for cadastral systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 35(1):77–87
Cartographic perspectives: bulletin of the North American cartographic information society (1989) 1/1(4)
Cetl V, Roic M, Ivic SM (2008) Cost-benefit analysis of the improvement of spatial data infrsastructure—case study Croatia. Geodetski Vestnik 52(3):475–486
Coetzee S, Harvey F, Iwaniak A, Cooper AK (2013) Sharing and coordinating SDIs in the age of crowdsourcing and mobile technologies. In: 26th international cartographic conference, Dresden
Craglia M, de Bie K, Jackson D et al (2012) Digital earth 2020: towards the vision for the next decade. Int J Digital Earth 5(1):4–21
De Man E (2011) Spatial data infrastructuring: praxis between dilemmas. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 6:261–289
De Man WHE (2007) Beyond spatial data infrastructures there are no SDIs—so what? Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 2:1–23
Dessers E, Crompvoets J, Janssen K, Vancauwenberghe G, Vandenbroucke D, Vanhaverbeke L, Van Hootegem G (2012) A multidisciplinary research framework for analysing the spatial enablement of public sector processes. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 7:125–150
Diaz L, Remke A, Kauppinene T et al. (20120) Future SDI—impulses from geoinformatics research and IT trends. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 7:378–410
Egyedi TM, Mehos DC, Vree WG (2012) Introducing inverse infrastructures. In: Egyedi TM, Mehos DC (eds) Inverse infrastructures. Disrupting networks from below. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Elwood S (2010) Geographic information science: emerging research on the societal implications of the geospatial web. Prog Hum Geogr 34(3):349–357
Genovese E, Cotteret G, Roche S, Caron C (2009) Evaluating the socio-economic impact of geographic information: a classification of the literature. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4:218–238
Georgiadou Y, Puri SK Sahay S (2005) Towards a potential research agenda to guide the implementation of spatial data infrastructures—a case study from India. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 19(10):1113–1130
Giff G, Crompvoets J (2008) Performance indicators a tool to support spatial data infrastructure assessment. Comput Environ Urban Syst 32(5):365–376
Giff G, Van Loenen B, Zevenbergen J (2008) PSGI policies in Norway and England: are they within the spirit of recent EU directives? Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 3:118–145
Goodchild M (2000) Communicating geographic information in a digital age. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90(2):344–355
Grus L, Crompvoets J, Bregt AK (2010) Spatial data infrastructures as complex adaptive systems. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 24(3):439–463
Grus L, Crompvoets J, Bregt AK (2007) Multi-view SDI assessment framework. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 2:33–53
Harley J (1989) Deconstructing the map. Cartographica 26(2):1–20
Hendriks PHJ, Dessers E, Van Hootegem G (2012) Reconsidering the definition of a spatial data infrastructure. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26(8):1479–1494
Hjelmager J, Moellering H, Cooper AK et al. (2008) An initial formal model for spatial data infrastructures. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(11–12):1295–1309
Kulk S, Van Loenen B (2012) Brave new open data world? Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 7:196–206
Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW (2009) Comparisons of citations in web of science. J Am Medial Assoc 302(10):1092–1096
Mäkelä J (2011) Aspects of a licensing and pricing model for a multi- producer pan-European data product. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 6:344–364
Mansourian A, Abdolmajidi E (2011) Investigating the system dynamics technique for the modeling and simulation of the development of spatial data infrastructures. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 25(12):2001–2023
Mansourian A, Rajabifard A, Valadan Zoej MJ, Williamson I (2006) Using SDI and web-based system to facilitate disaster management. Comput Geosci 32(3):303–315
Masser I, Campbell H (1991) Conditions for the effective utilisation of computers in urban planning in developing countries. Comput Environ Urban Syst 15(1–2):55–67
Onsrud H, Campbell J, Van Loenen B (2010) Towards voluntary interoperable open access licenses for the global earth observation system of systems (GEOSS). Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 5:194–215
Rajabifard A, Binns, A, Masser I, Williamson I (2006) The role of sub‐national government and the private sector in future spatial data infrastructures. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):727–741
Rajabifard A, Feeney M-EF, Williamson IP (2002) Future directions for SDI development. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 4(1):11–22
Rajabifard A, Williamson I, Steudler D, Binns A, King M (2007) Assessing the worldwide comparison of cadastral systems. Land Use Policy 24(1):275–288
Richter C, Miscione G, Georgiadou Y (2010) Conceptualizing people in SDI literature: implications for SDI research and development. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 5:286–325
Rydzak F, Obersteiner M, Kraxner F (2010) Impact of global earth observation—systemic view across GEOSS societal benefit areas. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 5:216–243
Singh PK (2009) Spatial data infrastructure in India: status, governance challenges, and strategies for effective functioning. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 4:359–388
Testa J (n.d.) The Thomson Reuters journal selection process. http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-selection-process/. Accessed 2 Oct 2014
Toomanian A, Mansourian A, Harrie L, Rydan A (2011) Using balanced scorecard for evaluation of spatial data infrastructures: a swedish case study in accordance with. Int J Spat Data Infrastruct Res 6:311–343
Van Loenen B, Zevenbergen J (2010) Assessing geographic information enhancement. Int J Spatial Data Infrastruct Res 5:244–266
Vree WG (2003) Internet en Rijkswaterstraat: een ICT-infrastructuur langs water en wegen. Inaugural speech, Delft: Delft University of Technology
Warnest M (2005) A collaboration model for national spatial data infrastructure in federated countries. Philosophy. University of Melbourne, Australia
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the DST/NRF sponsored intern, Teboho Mokono, who assisted with the literature search, wordless, and density maps.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coetzee, S., Wolff-Piggott, B. (2015). A Review of SDI Literature: Searching for Signs of Inverse Infrastructures. In: Robbi Sluter, C., Madureira Cruz, C., Leal de Menezes, P. (eds) Cartography - Maps Connecting the World. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17738-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)