Abstract
Pictographic symbols are used on many kinds of maps because they are able to convey information efficiently. There is still little research on the factors that affect the comprehension of map symbols. In this paper, we analyze the semantic contents of map symbols designed by university students from different countries to study how (1) the concepts to be depicted and (2) the differences in the cultural backgrounds of designers affect the design of the symbols. The results suggest that cultural conventions strongly affect the design and interpretation of map symbols. For some concepts, it is difficult to design an intuitive symbol, even for a user group with a homogeneous cultural background, because of the broadness of the concept or the lack of a logical representation strategy for the concept. In practice, easily interpretable symbols can be achieved by involving a representative set of intended users in creating ideas for the symbols.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akella MK (2009) First responders and crisis map symbols: clarifying communication. Cartography Geogr Inf Sci 36(1):19–28
Ben-Bassat T, Shinar D (2006) Ergonomic guidelines for traffic sign design increase sign comprehension. Hum Factors 48(1):182–195
Blees GJ, Mak WM (2012) Comprehension of disaster pictorials across cultures. J Multilingual Multicultural Dev 33(7):699–716
Böcker M (1996) A multiple index approach for the evaluation of pictograms and icons. Comput Stand Interfaces 18:107–115
Chan AH, Chan KW (2013) Effects of prospective-user factors and sign design features on guessability of pharmaceutical pictograms. Patient Educ Couns 90:268–275
de Saussure F (1959) Course in general linguistics. Philosophical Library, New York
Forrest D, Castner HW (1985) The design and perception of point symbols for tourist maps. Cartographic J 22(1):11–19
Hicks KE, Bell JL, Wogalter MS (2003) On the prediction of pictorial comprehension. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting (1735–1739), Denver, Co.
Isherwood SJ, McDougall SJ, Curry MB (2007) Icon identification in context: the changing role of icon characteristics with user experience. Hum Factors 49(3):465–476
Korpi J, Ahonen-Rainio P (2010) Cultural constraints in the design of pictographic symbols. Cartographic J 47(4):351–359
Kostelnick JC, Dobson JE, Egbert SL, Dunbar MD (2008) Cartographic symbols for humanitarian demining. Cartographic J 45(1):18–31
Lesch M, Rau P-LP, Zhao Z, Liu C (2009) A cross-cultural comparison of perceived hazard in response to warning components and configurations: US vs. China. Int J Ind Ergon 40:953–961
MacEachren AM (1995) How maps work: representation, visualization, and design. The Guilford Press, New York
McDougall SJ, Curry MB, de Bruijn O (1999) Measuring symbol and icon characteristics: norms for concreteness, complexity, meaningfulness, familiarity, and semantic distance for 239 symbols. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 31(3):487–519
Nakamura C, Zeng-Treitler Q (2012) A taxonomy of representation strategies in iconic communication. Int J Hum Comput Stud 70:535–551
Ng AW, Siu KW, Chan CC (2012) The effects of user factors and symbol referents on public symbol design using the stereotype production method. Appl Ergon 43:230–238
Oh K, Rogoff A, Smith-Jackson T (2013) The effects of sign design features on bicycle pictorial symbols for bicycling facility signs. Appl Ergon 44:990–995
Peirce CS (1935) Collected papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, CA
Purchase H (1998) Defining multimedia. IEEE Multimedia 5(1):8–15
Schröder S, Ziefle M (2008) Making a completely icon-based menu in mobile devices to become true: a user-centered design approach for its development. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services, pp 137–146. ACM, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Korpi, J., Ahonen-Rainio, P. (2015). Effect of Cultural Differences and Referent Characteristics on the Design of Pictographic Map Symbols. In: Robbi Sluter, C., Madureira Cruz, C., Leal de Menezes, P. (eds) Cartography - Maps Connecting the World. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17738-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17738-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)