Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 1187 Accesses

Abstract

One way to improve manufacturing processes is to look at the data and information involved and how this information is put to use (Hicks et al. 2006). As stated by Albinoet al. (2002), the successful coordination of a manufacturing process is mostly based on a successful handling of information to support process management and other tasks involved. With today’s advanced ICT it becomes possible to process, transfer and store large amounts of data and information for a reasonable price (Krcmar 2005). But too much information can be a threat for improved process quality as it can e.g., distract from the main issues/causalities or lead to delayed or wrong conclusions about appropriate actions (Lang 2007). Jansen-Vullers et al. (2003) emphasize the importance of the availability of the right information for quality during manufacturing processes. Hence the question is: What is the right and relevant information in the case of distributed manufacturing process chains and high tech industrial products?

Manufacturing creates wealth

(Prof. Ronald G. Askin, Arizona State University (USA) during the INCOM 2012 Keynote speech Wednesday, May 23, 2012 in Bucharest, Romania).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albino, V., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2002). Analysis of information flows to enhance the coordination of production processes. International Journal of Production Economics, 75(2002), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinksmeier, E. (1991). Prozeß-und Werkstückqualität in der Feinbearbeitung. Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 2: Fertigungstechnik (p. 256). Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhr, A., Graf, W., Power, L. M. & Amthauer, K. (2005). Almatis global product concept for the refractory industry. Retrieved September 27, 2008, from http://www.almatis.com/download/technical-papers/UNITECR05-180.pdf.

  • Cassina, J., Cannata, A. & Taisch, M. (2009). Development of an extended product lifecycle management through service oriented architecture. In Proceedings of the 1st CIRP Industrial Product-Service Systems (IPS2) Conference (pp. 118–124). Cranfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhary, A. K., Harding, J. A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2009). Data mining in manufacturing: a review based on the kind of knowledge. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(5), 501–521. doi:10.1007/s10845-008-0145-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deja, M., & Siemiatkowski, M. S. (2012). Feature-based generation of machining process plans for optimised parts manufacture. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0633-x.

  • Denton, B., Gupta, D., & Jawahir, K. (2003). Managing increasing product variety at integrated steel mills. Interfaces, 33(2), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devadason, F. J., & Lingam, P. P. (1997). A methodology for indentification of information needs of users. IFLA Journal, 23(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellram, L., & Krause, D. (1994). Supplier partnerships in manufacturing versus non-manufacturing firms. International Journal of Logistics, 5(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enderwick, P. (2005). Globalization and Labor. New York: Chelsea House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. (2007). Rohstoffe als Beitrag zur Portfoliooptimierung. München: GRIN Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A. (1984). What does “product quality” really mean? MIT Sloan Management Review, 26(1), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamel, C. K., & Prahalad, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 61(3), 275–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., & McMahon, C. A. (2006). A study of issues relating to information management across engineering SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 267–289. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, J., & Petrick, K. (2007). Qualitätsmanagement und Normung. In R. Schmitt & T. Pfeifer (Eds.), Masing Handbuch Qualitätsmanagement (pp. 101–121). München: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen-Vullers, M. H., van Drop, C. A., & Beulens, A. J. M. (2003). Managing traceability information in manufacture. International Journal of Information Management, 23(2003), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpakjian, S., & Schmid, S. R. (2009). Manufacturing engineering and technology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kano, M., & Nakagawa, Y. (2008). Data-based process monitoring, process control, and quality improvement: Recent developments and applications in steel industry. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 32(1–2), 12–24. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2007.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovačič, M., & Šarler, B. (2009). Application of the genetic programming for increasing the soft annealing productivity in steel industry. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 24(3), 369–374. doi:10.1080/10426910802679634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köksal, G., Batmaz, İ., & Testik, M. C. (2011). A review of data mining applications for quality improvement in manufacturing industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(10), 13448–13467. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krcmar, H. (2005). Informationsmanagement. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreutzberg, J. (2000). Qualitätsmanagement auf dem Prüfstand, Analyse des Qualitätsmanagements von Informationssystemen. Dissertation, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, S. (2002). Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (pp. 1–20). Ranchi. Retrieved from http://pchats.tripod.com/int_manu.pdf.

  • Lang, S. (2007). Durchgängige Mitarbeiterinformation zur Steigerung von Effizienz und Prozesssicherheit in der Produktion. Dissertation, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Bamberg: Meisenbach Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, K. M. (2007). Duden Wirtschaft von A bis Z: Grundlagenwissen für Schule und Studium, Beruf und Alltag (Gebundene Ausgabe). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1993). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, May-June, 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linß, G. (2002). Qualitätsmanagement für Ingenieure. München/Wien: Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löhr-Richter, P. (1993). Zur Diskussion: Methodologie - Methodik—Methode. Was steckt dahinter? Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. - Lecture Notes in Informatics, 1(1993), 39–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, H. W. (1988). Strategische Rohstoffe—Risiken für die Wirtschaftliche Si-cherheit des Westens. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, P. P. (2004). An agent-oriented approach to resolve the production planning complexities for a modern steel manufacturing system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(3–4), 199–205. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1673-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • N.N., (2006). The problem with solid engineering. The Economist, 379(8478), 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance: With a new introduction. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2008). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puzzanghera, J. (2013). Manufacturing shows surprising strength. Los Angeles Times, October 2, 2013, p. B4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiersch, A. (2009). Inefficiency in the German Mechanical Engineering Sector 1–29. Berlin. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1514278.

  • Sitek, P., Seifert, M., & Thoben, K.-D. (2010). Towards an inter-organisational perspective for managing quality in virtual organisations. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 27(2), 231–246. doi:10.1108/02656711011014339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, D., & Braunisch, D. (2008). Sekundärrohstofflogistik—Konzepte und Anwendungen. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, 103(12), 875–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terzi, S., Panetto, H., Morel, G., & Garetti, M. (2007). A holonic metamodel for product traceabily in PLM. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 2(3), 253–289. doi:10.1504/IJPLM.2007.016292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thesing, G., Randow, J., Kirchfeld, A., Berberich, S., & Webb, A. (2010). New rules and old companies (how the mittelstand company approach in germany encourages and benefits from a strong sense of social responsibility). Bloomberg Businessweek, 4198, 72–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A. J., Byard, P., & Evans, R. (2012). Identifying the UK’s manufacturing challenges as a benchmark for future growth. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(2), 142–156. doi:10.1108/17410381211202160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tönshoff, H. K., & Denkena, B. (2013). Basics of cutting and abrasive processes. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33257-9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, H. A. (1998). Developmental neurotoxicology of endocrine disruptors and pesticides: identification of information gaps and research needs. Environmental Health Perspective, 3(106), 807–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Universität Bremen. (2007). Promotionsordnung der Universität Bremen für die mathematischen, natur- und ingenieurwissenschaftlichen Fachbereiche vom 14. März 2007. Retrieved August, 13 2013 from http://www.math.uni-bremen.de/cms/media.php/59/PromO%20FB%202-5%20_14%203%2007_6442.pdf.

  • Wuest, T., Klein, D., & Thoben, K.-D. (2011). State of steel products in industrial production processes. Procedia Engineering, 10(2011), 2220–2225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuest, T., & Thoben, K.-D. (2012). Exploitation of material property potentials to reduce rare raw material waste—a product state based concept for manufacturing process improvement. Journal of Mining World Express (MWE), 1(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wuest, T., Knoke, B., & Thoben, K.-D. (2014). Applying graph theory and the product state concept in manufacturing. Procedia Technology, 15(2014), 349–358. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yul, T. & Wang, G. (2009). The process quality control of single-piece and small-batch products in advanced manufacturing environment. In 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009. IE&EM ’09 (pp. 306–310). Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoch, H.-W. & Lübben, Th. (2011). Verzugsbeherrschung—Systemorientierter Ansatz als wesentliche Voraussetzung für den Erfolg. Stahl Strukturen. In Bleck, W. (Ed.) (2011). Industrie-, Forschungs-, Mikro- und Bauteilstrukturen—Tagungsband zum 26. Aachener Stahlkolloquium, 19./20.05.2011, Verlagshaus Mainz, ISBN 3-86130-258-6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Wuest .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wuest, T. (2015). Introduction. In: Identifying Product and Process State Drivers in Manufacturing Systems Using Supervised Machine Learning. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17611-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17611-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17610-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17611-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics