Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Recognition and Family Life: Recognition Mechanisms in the Biparental Burying Beetle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Recognition in Invertebrates

Abstract

Burying beetles (genus Nicrophorus) are one of the few insect taxa that provide elaborate prehatching and posthatching biparental care. They reproduce on dead vertebrates and both parents are known to feed and defend their young. In this chapter, I will show that both of their key characteristics, their extended biparental care as well as their reproduction on a valuable and sought-after resource gave rise to the evolution of sophisticated recognition mechanisms. They are able to recognize the sex of a conspecific, their previous mating partner, their breeding partner including its reproductive sate and—using temporal cues—their offspring. I will provide an overview of the recent advances in elucidating the recognition processes of burying beetles and will demonstrate that most of the recognition mechanisms are mediated by chemical cues and signals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler NT (1978) On the mechanisms of sexual behavior and their evolutionary constraints. In: Hutchinson JB (ed) Biological determinants of sexual behavior. Wiley, New York, pp 655–695

    Google Scholar 

  • Arce AN, Johnston PR, Smiseth PT, Rozen DE (2012) Mechanisms and fitness effects of antibacterial defences in a carrion beetle. J Evol Biol 25(5):930–937. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02486.x

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud L, Haubruge E (1999) Mating behaviour and male mate choice in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Behaviour 136(1):67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett J (1987) Filial cannibalism in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21(3):179–183. doi:10.1007/bf00303208

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett J (1988) Male mating success and paternal care in Nicrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 23(5):297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeler AE, Rauter CM, Moore AJ (1999) Pheromonally mediated mate attraction by males of the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis: alternative calling tactics conditional on both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Behav Ecol 10(5):578–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Beeler AE, Rauter CM, Moore AJ (2002) Mate discrimination by females in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis: the influence of male size on attractiveness to females. Ecol Entomol 27(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • BellĂ©s X, Martin D, Piulachs MD (2005) The mevalonate pathway and the synthesis of juvenile hormone in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 50:181–199

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotter SC, Kilner RM (2009) Sexual division of antibacterial resource defence in breeding burying beetles Nicrophorus vespilloides. J Anim Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01593.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotter SC, Topham E, Price AJP, Kilner RM (2010) Fitness costs associated with mounting a social immune response. Ecol Lett 13(9):1114–1123. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01500.x

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke MDL, Kacelnik A (1996) Recognition errors and probability of parasitism determine whether reed warblers should accept or reject mimetic cuckoo eggs. Proc R Soc B—Biol Sci 263(1372):925–931

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Boer SPA, Duchateau M (2006) A larval hunger signal in the bumblebee Bombus terrestris. Insectes Soc 53(3):369–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewsbury DA (1981) Effects of novelty on copulatory-behavior—the coolidge effect and related phenomena. Psychol Bull 89(3):464–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan A, Verrell PA (1991) The effect of partner familiarity on courtship success in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. J Herpetol 25(1):93–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert AK (1990) Chemische Kommunikation beim Totengräber Necrophorus vespilloides Herbst (Coleoptera: Silphidae): Pheromonabgabe als alternative Fortpflanzungstaktik der Männchen. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert AK, MĂĽller JK (1989a) Mating success of pheromone-emitting Necrophorus males: do attracted females discriminate against resource owners? Behaviour 110(1–4):248–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert AK, MĂĽller JK (1989b) Pheromone-mediated attraction in burying beetles. Ecol Entomol 14(2):235–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, MĂĽller JK (1992) Joint breeding in female burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31(4):237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, MĂĽller JK (1997) Biparental care and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, pp 216–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, MĂĽller JK (2011) Timing of oviposition enables dominant female burying beetles to destroy brood-parasitic young. Animal Behaviour 82(6):1227–1233. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.001

  • Eggert AK, Otte T, MĂĽller JK (2008) Starving the competition: a proximate cause of reproductive skew in burying beetles (Nicrophorus vespilloides). Proc R Soc B 275(1650):2521–2528. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0661

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elwood RW (1994) Temporal-based kinship recognition: a switch in time saves mine. Behav Process 33:15–24. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(94)90057-4

  • Endler A, Liebig J, Schmitt T, Parker JE, Jones GR, Schreier P, Hölldobler B (2004) Surface hydrocarbons of queen eggs regulate worker reproduction in a social insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(9):2945–2950

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Engel KC, von Hoermann C, Eggert A-K, MĂĽller JK, Steiger S (2014) When males stop having sex: adaptive insect mating tactics during parental care. Anim Behav 90(0):245–253. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.006

  • Engel K, Männer L, Ayasse M, Steiger S (2015) Acceptance threshold theory can explain occurrence of homosexual behaviour. Biol Lett 11:20140603 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0603

  • Fabre JH (1899) Souvenirs Entomologiques, vol 6. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston IA, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1990) Parental care in burying beetles: the organization of male and female brood-care behavior. Ethology 85(3):177–190. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1990.tb00398.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershman SN, Sakaluk SK (2009) No coolidge effect in decorated crickets. Ethology 115(8):774–780. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01663.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F, Aquiloni L, Tricarico E (2012) Revisiting social recognition systems in invertebrates. Animal cognition 15(5):745–762

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haberer W, Schmitt T, Peschke K, Schreier P, MĂĽller JK (2008) Ethyl 4-methyl heptanoate: a male-produced pheromone of Nicrophorus vespilloides. J Chem Ecol 34(1):94–98

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haberer W, Steiger S, MĂĽller JK (2010) (E)-Methylgeranate, a chemical signal of juvenile hormone titre and its role in the partner recognition system of burying beetles. Anim Behav 79(1):17–24. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.09.019

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberer W, Schmitt T, Schreier P, Muller JK (2011) Intended and unintended receivers of the male pheromones of the burying beetles Nicrophorus humator and Nicrophorus vespilloides. Entomol Exp Appl 140(2):122–126. doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01143.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Häderer IK, Werminghausen J, Michiels NK, Timmermeyer N, Anthes N (2009) No effect of mate novelty on sexual motivation in the freshwater snail Biomphalaria glabrata. Front Zool 6:23

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CL, Wadsworth NK, Howard DR, Jennings EM, Farrell LD, Magnuson TS, Smith RJ (2011) Inhibition of microorganisms on a carrion breeding resource: the antimicrobial peptide activity of burying beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae) oral and anal secretions. Environ Entomol 40(3):669–678

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Sherman PW (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci 24(10):609–616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Moskat C, Ban M (2006) Experimental shift in hosts’ acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett 2(2):177–180. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0438

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta C, Halffter G, Fresneau D (1992) Inhibition of stridulation in Nicrophorus (Coleoptera: Silphidae): consequences for reproduction. Elytron 6:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivy TM, Weddle CB, Sakaluk SK (2005) Females use self-referent cues to avoid mating with previous mates. Proc R Soc B 272(1580):2475–2478

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley JL, Graves JA, Magurran AE (1999) Familiarity breeds contempt in guppies. Nature 401(6754):661–662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM, Langmore NE (2011) Cuckoos versus hosts in insects and birds: adaptations, counter-adaptations and outcomes. Biol Rev 86(4):836–852. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00173.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koene JM, Ter Maat A (2007) Coolidge effect in pond snails: male motivation in a simultaneous hermaphrodite. BMC Evol Biol 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulianos S, Schwarz HH (2000) Probability of intra- and interspecific encounters, and the duration of parental care in Nicrophorus investigator (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 93(4):836–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebert AE, Starks PT (2004) The action component of recognition systems: a focus on the response. Ann Zool Fennici 41(6):747–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas F, Haynes KF, Kölliker M (2009) A chemical signal of offspring quality affects maternal care in a social insect. Proc R Soc B 276(1668):2847–2853. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0498

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK (1987) Replacement of a lost clutch—a strategy for optimal resource utilization in Necrophorus vespilloides (Coleoptera, Silphidae). Ethology 76(1):74–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK, Eggert A-K (1987) Effects of carrion-independent pheromone emission by male burying beetles (Silphidae: Necrophorus). Ethology 76:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK, Eggert AK (1990) Time-dependent shifts between infanticidal and parental behavior in female burying beetles a mechanism of indirect mother-offspring recognition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27(1):11–16

    Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK, Eggert AK, Dressel J (1990) Intraspecific brood parasitism in the burying beetle Necrophorus vespilloides Coleoptera Silphidae. Anim Behav 40(3):491–499

    Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK, Eggert A-K, Sakaluk SK (1998) Carcass maintenance and biparental brood care in burying beetles: are males redundant? Ecol Entomol 23(2):195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK, Eggert A-K, Elsner T (2003) Nestmate recognition in burying beetles: the “breeder’s badge” as a cue used by females to distinguish their mates from male intruders. Behav Ecol 14:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  • MĂĽller JK, Braunisch V, Hwang WB, Eggert AK (2007) Alternative tactics and individual reproductive success in natural associations of the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides. Behav Ecol 18(1):196–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemitz C, Krampe A (1972) Untersuchungen zum Orientierungsverhalten der Larven von Necrophorus vespillo F. (Silphidae Coleoptera). Zeitschrift fĂĽr Tierpsychologie 30(5):456–463

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldekop JA, Smiseth PT, Piggins HD, Moore AJ (2007) Adaptive switch from infanticide to parental care: how do beetles time their behaviour? J Evol Biol 20(5):1998–2004

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Panaitof SC, Scott MP, Borst DW (2004) Plasticity in juvenile hormone in male burying beetles during breeding: physiological consequences of the loss of a mate. J Insect Physiol 50(8):715–724

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peck S, Kaulbars M (1987) A synopsis of the distribution and bionomics of the carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) of the conterminous United States. Proc Entomol Soc Ontario 118:47–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzari T, Cornwallis CK, Lovlie H, Jakobsson S, Birkhead TR (2003) Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426(6962):70–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pukowski E (1933) Ă–kologische Untersuchungen an Necrophorus F. Z Morphol Ă–kol Tiere 27:518–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauter CM, Moore AJ (1999) Do honest signalling models of offspring solicitation apply to insects? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266(1429):1691–1696. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0833

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve HK (1989) The evolution of conspecific acceptance thresholds. Am Nat 133(3):407–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson IC (1993) Nest intrusions, infanticide, and parental care in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis (Coleoptera: Silphidae). J Zool 231(4):583–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Manzo G (1999) Blockade of the establishment of the sexual inhibition resulting from sexual exhaustion by the Coolidge effect. Behav Brain Res 100(1–2):245–254

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Royle NJ, Hopwood PE, Head ML (2013) Burying beetles. Curr Biol 23(20):R907–R909. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.066

  • Scott MP (1989) Male parental care and reproductive success in the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis. J Insect Behav 2(1):133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1990) Brood guarding and the evolution of male parental care in burying beetles. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26(1):31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1994) The benefit of paternal assistance in intra- and interspecific competition for the burying beetle Nicrophorus defodiens. Ethol Ecol Evol 6(4):537–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1997) Reproductive dominance and differential ovicide in the communally breeding burying beetle Nicrophorus tomentosus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 40(5):313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP (1998) The ecology and behavior of burying beetles. Annu Rev Entomol 43:595–618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Panaitof SC (2004) Social stimuli affect juvenile hormone during breeding in biparental burying beetles (Silphidae: Nicrophorus). Horm Behav 45(3):159–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1990) Behavioral and ecological correlates of male and female parental care and reproductive success in burying beetles Nicrophorus spp. Anim Behav 39(2):274–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Williams SM (1993) Comparative reproductive success of communally breeding burying beetles as assessed by PCR with randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90(6):2242–2245

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Trumbo ST, Neese PA, Bailey WD, Roe RM (2001) Changes in biosynthesis and degradation of juvenile hormone during breeding by burying beetles: a reproductive or social role? J Insect Physiol 47(3):295–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Lee WJ, van der Reijden ED (2007) The frequency and fitness consequences of communal breeding in a natural population of burying beetles: a test of reproductive skew. Ecol Entomol 32(6):651–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott MP, Madjid K, Orians CM (2008) Breeding alters cuticular hydrocarbons and mediates partner recognition by burying beetles. Anim Behav 76:507–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach, 4th edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikes DS, Venables C (2013) Molecular phylogeny of the burying beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae: Nicrophorinae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 69(3):552–565. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.022

  • Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2002) Does resource availability affect offspring begging and parental provisioning in a partially begging species? Anim Behav 63(3):577–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2004) Signalling of hunger when offspring forage by both begging and self-feeding. Anim Behav 67:1083–1088. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.012

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2007) Signalling of hunger by senior and junior larvae in asynchronous broods of a burying beetle. Anim Behav 74(4):699–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2008) Parental distribution of resources in relation to larval hunger and size rank in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Ethology 114(8):789–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Parker HJ (2008) Is there a cost to larval begging in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides? Behav Ecol 19(6):1111–1115. doi:10.1093/beheco/arn101

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Darwell CT, Moore AJ (2003) Partial begging: an empirical model for the early evolution of offspring signalling. Proc R Soc B 270(1526):1773–1777

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smiseth PT, Andrews C, Brown E, Prentice PM (2010) Chemical stimuli from parents trigger larval begging in burying beetles. Behav Ecol 21(3):526–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S (2013) Bigger mothers are better mothers: disentangling size-related prenatal and postnatal maternal effects. Proc R Soc B 280:20131225. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1225

  • Steiger S, MĂĽller JK (2010) From class-specific to individual discrimination: acceptance threshold changes with risk in the partner recognition system of the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Anim Behav 80(4):607–613. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.06.018

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Peschke K, Francke W, MĂĽller JK (2007) The smell of parents: breeding status influences cuticular hydrocarbon pattern in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Proc R Soc B 274:2211–2220

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Franz R, Eggert A-K, MĂĽller JK (2008a) The Coolidge effect, individual recognition and selection for distinctive cuticular signatures in a burying beetle. Proc R Soc B 275(1645):1831–1838

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Peschke K, MĂĽller JK (2008b) Correlated changes in breeding status and polyunsaturated cuticular hydrocarbons: the chemical basis of nestmate recognition in the burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1053–1060

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Whitlow S, Peschke K, MĂĽller JK (2009) Surface chemicals inform about sex and breeding status in the biparental burying beetle Nicrophorus vespilloides. Ethology 115(2):178–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Gershman SN, Pettinger AM, Eggert A-K, Sakaluk SK (2011a) Sex differences in immunity and rapid upregulation of immune defence during parental care in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus orbicollis. Funct Ecol 25:1368–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Haberer W, MĂĽller JK (2011b) Social environment determines degree of chemical signalling. Biol Lett 7:822–824. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2011.0457

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiger S, Schmitt T, Schaefer HM (2011c) The origin and dynamic evolution of chemical information transfer. Proc R Soc B 278(1708):970–979. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2285

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S (2001) Suppression of fungal development on carcasses by the burying beetle Nicrophorus quadripunctatus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Entomol Sci 4:403–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki S, Nagano M (2009) To compensate or not? Caring parents respond differentially to mate removal and mate handicapping in the burying beetle Nicrophorus quadripunctatus. Ethology 115(1):1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01598.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokarz RR (1992) Male mating preference for unfamiliar females in the lizard Anolis sagrei. Anim Behav 44(5):843–849

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1990a) Interference competition among burying beetles (Silphidae, Nicrophorus). Ecol Entomol 15(3):347–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1990b) Regulation of brood size in a burying beetle Nicrophorus tomentosus Silphidae. J Insect Behav 3(4):491–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1990c) Reproductive benefits of infanticide in a biparental burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27(4):269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1991) Reproductive benefits and the duration of paternal care in a biparental burying beetle Necrophorus orbicollis. Behaviour 117(1–2):82–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1992) Monogamy to communal breeding: exploitation of a broad resource base by burying beetles (Nicrophorus). Ecol Entomol 17(3):289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1994) Interspecific competition, brood parasitism, and the evolution of biparental cooperation in burying beetles. Oikos 69(2):241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (1997) Juvenile hormone-mediated reproduction in burying beetles: from behavior to physiology. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 35(4):479–490

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST (2006) Infanticide, sexual selection and task specialization in a biparental burying beetle. Anim Behav 72:1159–1167

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Robinson GE (2004) Nutrition, hormones and life history in burying beetles. J Insect Physiol 50(5):383–391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Valletta RC (2007) The costs of confronting infanticidal intruders in a burying beetle. Ethology 113(4):386–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Wilson DS (1993) Brood discrimination, nest mate discrimination, and determinants of social behavior in facultatively quasisocial beetles (Nicrophorus spp.). Behav Ecol 4(4):332–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Borst DW, Robinson GE (1995) Rapid elevation of juvenile hormone titer during behavioral assessment of the breeding resource by the burying beetle Nicrophorus orbicollis. J Insect Physiol 41(6):535–543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo ST, Kon M, Sikes D (2001) The reproductive biology of Ptomascopus morio, a brood parasite of Nicrophorus. J Zool 255(4):543–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling CA, Stamper CE, Smiseth PT, Moore AJ (2008) The quantitative genetics of sex differences in parenting. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105(47):18430–18435. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803146105

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weddle CB, Steiger S, Hamaker CG, Ower GD, Mitchell C, Sakaluk SK, Hunt J (2013) Cuticular hydrocarbons as a basis for chemosensory self-referencing in crickets: a potentially universal mechanism facilitating polyandry in insects. Ecol Lett 16(3):346–353. doi:10.1111/ele.12046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Gage MJG, Parker GA (2002) Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol Evol 17(7):313–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JR, Kuehn RE, Beach FA (1963) Modification in sexual behavior of male rats produced by changing stimulus female. J Comp Physiol Psychol 56(3):636–644

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am very thankful to Johannes Stökl and Josef K. Müller for valuable comments on the manuscript. S.S. was supported by a DFG grant (STE 1874/3-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Evolutionary Ecology and Conservation Genomics, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081, Ulm, Germany

    Sandra Steiger

Authors
  1. Sandra Steiger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Steiger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Laura Aquiloni

  2. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Elena Tricarico

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Steiger, S. (2015). Recognition and Family Life: Recognition Mechanisms in the Biparental Burying Beetle. In: Aquiloni, L., Tricarico, E. (eds) Social Recognition in Invertebrates. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17599-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation