Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science ((BRIEFSENVIRONMENTAL))

Abstract

This chapter explains the mechanism by means of which natural disasters and some past economic policy decisions have turned into hazards in Mexico. Natural disasters occurrence is increasingly producing severe damages to the so-called traditional agriculture, highly exposed to climatic events due to its predominating rainfed cropping practices as well as its high marginalization conditions, which together tend to amplify the negative effects from hazards. In the frame of the economic reforms implemented from the middle of the eighties, trade liberalization has led some economic sectors to increase more remarkably their exposure to international markets. The negative impact of trade liberalization on rural livelihoods has been evidenced over the past two decades through price drops of agricultural grains, the main crop of subsistence farmers. It has undermined their incomes given their limitations to increase neither productivity nor cropping land, as well as their inability to re-orientate production.

No cabe duda que es preciso superar el liberalismo del siglo XIX.

ORTEGA Y GASSET, La rebeliĆ³n de las masas

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is analyzed in more detail in Chapter 4, which models it with coping- and adaptability-related variables.

  2. 2.

    More deeply analyzed in Chapter 5.

  3. 3.

    Over 1,000 fatal victims in Central America.

  4. 4.

    The Southeast of Mexico shares with Central America and Caribbean countries not only the above presented high hurricanes and earthquakes affectation, but also the fact that disaster-vulnerable population is highly poor. Affected population in Mexico are usually located in southeast states, which, like in Central American and Caribbean countries, are subsistence farmers without access to credit, low crop insurance coverage, and work small farms. However, most the times these countries are hit by the same hurricane, relative higher economic losses and calamities occur in Central America and the Caribbean compared to Mexico. It is so particularly due to differences in coping and adaptive capacity among them. It suggests the potential applicability of this thesis approach of vulnerability reduction to these other countries.

  5. 5.

    However, losses in Mexico compared to national GDP are equivalent to 0.002%, while in Guatemala it reached 3.5% of GDP.

  6. 6.

    As in the arid region of Monterrey in 1998 (CENAPRED 2001).

  7. 7.

    With data from La Red.

  8. 8.

    In geomorphologic terms, the Trans-Mexico Volcanic Belt defines the boundary between the North American Rocky Mountains-Sierra Madre Occidental system, and the Mesoamerican Sierra Madre del Sur- Sierra Madre de Chiapas.

  9. 9.

    In large cities ā€“such as Puebla, Cuernavaca, and Mexico City, over 40 kilometers away from Popocatepetl-, the effects of an eruption are likely to be limited to falling volcanic ash.

  10. 10.

    This data basis has been created by Desinventar (DesenRedando, La Red 2004) by collecting reports from media, especially from three Newspapers for the Mexican case: El Universal, La Jornada, and Excelsior. Given that fact, data arising from Desinventar must to be carefully employed, since in detailed analysis some data may be incomplete, leading to either over- or underestimated losses due to its journalist nature. However, it is helpful to get general pictures of disasters. It also provides good approaches on magnitudes and disaster frequency. Amount of losses are still controversial, since they vary widely from observation to observation, and rarely coincide with other sources.

  11. 11.

    In fact, most of the increase in weather-related disasters may be linked to El NiƱo phenomena (Vatsa and Krimgold 2000: 131; CENAPRED 2001: 145)

  12. 12.

    Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica (INEGI), Aguascalientes, Mexico.

  13. 13.

    Country assistance strategy of the World Bank Group for the Mexican United States (World Bank 2002).

  14. 14.

    Losses reached 9.3% of Chiapas GDP in 1998.

  15. 15.

    Experts on demography used to name this socio-economic distribution as The Bell of Income, due to its geographic shape: poor from south-west to the north, each time narrower; rich from north to south-east, each time wider; and a mixture of middle, high and low income in the middle.

  16. 16.

    15.6 million people live alone in Distrito Federal, plus 5.1 in neighbour municipalities, which have been integrated into the metropolis. Sources: World Resources Institute 1996-1997: The urban environmental (New York: Oxford University Press) tab. 1.1; United Nations, World Urbanization Prospects. See Appendix B for income distribution.

  17. 17.

    A frequent questioning of globalization is about its innovation. Helleiner (1997) considers globalization to be not only a phenomenon of the modern age, but placed in the context of a secular trend of world historical development. So, one can find similar globalization patterns connecting the second half of the 19th century (Victorian era of the English empire, la belle epoche in France), with the Spanish colonialism in the centuries 17th and 18th (i.e. Galeon Manila-Acapulco-Cadiz) and even with the ancient Silk Route.

  18. 18.

    A conventionally admitted aspect of globalization is its growing magnitude or intensity of global flows such that states and societies become increasingly inserted in world systems and in networks of interaction based on continuously improving communications facilities.

  19. 19.

    In terms of flows of people (legal and illegal), the trend is very similar too. Unlike some negligible programs on temporary work, Mexico has not signed trans-boundary labor agreements with the USA, and despite that fact, over 90% of international emigration goes to that country.

  20. 20.

    Quiroz (2002) reckons that 60% of foreign direct investment in Mexico arose from the USA in 1995 ā€“the rest from Germany (5%), Japan (4.5%), etc. There is widespread criticism of the fact that most FDI in Mexico is comprised of investments of multinational companies in their existing branches in Mexico, rather than of new business implementation and incorporating new economic agents to the benefits of foreign trade (Dussel 2000). In addition, capital and exports concentration in very few hands is taking place following trade liberalization in this country (SaldaƱa-Zorrilla 2003).

  21. 21.

    Trade triangulation is considered a kind of documented smuggling, since it consists of importing merchandise from a non-NAFTA country, but presenting false purchase bills from a NAFTA area country in order to get the tariff exemption agreed in NAFTA.

  22. 22.

    More detailed discussion in Chapter 4 of this work

  23. 23.

    Subsistema de Informacion Agricola, Ministry of Agriculture.

  24. 24.

    Obtained by multiplying weighted production prices ($/ton) by weighted agricultural yield (ton/ha).

Chapter References

  • Acosta C (2006) Yo, el mĆ”s grande (I, the biggest one). Proceso Magazine. 30th Anniversary Special Issue, October-December 2006. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • AlbalĆ”-Bertrand JM (1993) The political economy of large natural disasters. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baffes J, Meerman J (1998) From Prices to Incomes: Agricultural Subsidization without Protection? World Bank Research Observer 13(2)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Benson C, Clay E (2002) Vulnerability and the Global Economy. In: The Future of Disaster Risk: Building Safer Cities, Conference Papers. Kreimer A, Arnold M, Carlin A (Ed) The World Bank. Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • BitrĆ”n D et al (2001) CaracterĆ­sticas del impacto socioeconĆ³mico de los principales desastres ocurridos en MĆ©xico en el periodo 1980-1999. Centro Nacional de PrevenciĆ³n de Desastres. SecretarĆ­a de GobernaciĆ³n, Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Briguglio L (2002) The Economic Vulnerability of Small Island Developing States. In: Sustainable Development for Island Societies: Taiwan and the World, Asia Pacific Research Program w/SARCS Secretariat Publication. Taiwan

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Burfisher M, Robinson S, Thierfelder K (1992) Agricultural and Food Policies in a United States-Mexico Free Trade Agreement. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 3:117ā€“139

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Butterfield G (1998) Workers World. Hurricane Georges: A tale of two systems. October

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CalderĆ³n E, CazĆ©s D (1991) Prontuario de Resultados. Elecciones Federales de 1988. FundaciĆ³n Arturo Rosenblueth. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Calva JL (2004) Ajuste Estructural y TLCAN: efectos en la agricultura mexicana y reflexiones sobre el ALCA. In: El Cotidiano No. 124. Universidad AutĆ³noma Metropolitana. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cannon T (1994) Vulnerability Analysis and the Explanation of ā€˜Naturalā€™ Disasters. In: Varley, Anne. Disasters, development and environment. Ed. John Willey & Sons. Chichester

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Castells M (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Castillo H (1985) Vivir el horror (Living the horror). In: Proceso No. 465, 28/sep/1985. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • CENAPRED (2001) DiagnĆ³stico de peligros e identificaciĆ³n de riesgos de desastres en MĆ©xico: Atlas Nacional de Riesgos de la RepĆŗblica Mexicana. Centro Nacional de PrevenciĆ³n de Desastres, Ministry of the Interior of Mexico, Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Center of Migration Studies of Washington (2003) Population Growth, Immigration, and the Problem of Sprawl. August 2003. By Roy Beck, Leon Kolankiewicz, and Steven A. Camarota http://www.cis.org/articles/2003/sprawlcoverage.html

  • CNA-Comision Nacional del Agua (1998) Reporte Anual de Actividades. Gobierno Federal Mexicano. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Conde C, SaldaƱa-Zorrilla SO (2008) Climate Change in Latin-America and Caribbean Countries: Impacts, Vulnerability and the need for Adaptation. In: Challenges on Climate Change in Latin-America. The International Development Research Centre (IDRC-Canada) and Department for international Development (DFID-UK). 17 pp. Enero 2008

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Currie C, Hyndman R, Wang K, Kostoglodov V (2002) Thermal models of the Mexico subduction zone: Implications for the megathrust seismogenic zone: Journal of Geophysical Research, 107 (B12), doi: 10.1029/2001JB000886, 15-1-15-13

  • Dussel E (2000) El Tratado de Libre Comercio de NorteamĆ©rica y el DesempeƱo de la EconomĆ­a en MĆ©xico. Naciones Unidas. ComisiĆ³n EconĆ³mica para AmĆ©rica Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL). Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ECLAC (2006) MĆ©xico: Crecimiento Agropecuario, TLCAN, Capital Humano y GestiĆ³n del Riesgo. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ECLAC (2003) Panorama Social de AmĆ©rica Latina 2002-2003. Pobreza y distribuciĆ³n del ingreso. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago de Chile

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ECLAC (2001) Instituciones y pobreza rurales en MĆ©xico y CentroamĆ©rica. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, Mexico City, p 30

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • ECLAC (1986) El terremoto de 1986 en San Salvador: daƱos, repercusiones y ayuda requerida. United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, , Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Frankel JA, Romer D (2000) Does Trade Cause Growth. American Economic Review 89(3):379ā€“399

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Freeman P, Mechler R (2001) Public sector risk management in Mexico for Natural Disaster Losses. Issues paper for a Wharton-World Bank Conference on ā€œInnovations in Managing Catastrophic Risks: how can they help the poor?ā€ Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • GarcĆ­a V, De la Parra M (2002) Desinventar y los registros sobre escasez de agua en MĆ©xico. 1970-2000. In Nueva Ć©poca. AƱo 7, septiembre-diciembre 2002. CIESA. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Guy Carpenter (2006) Tropical Cyclone Review 2005. Instrat Briefing. January 2006 http://gcportal.guycarp.com/portal/extranet/popup/pdf/GCBriefings/Tropical_Cyclone_Review_2005.pdf

  • Held D, McGrew A (2000) The great globalization debate: an introduction. In: Reader TGT (ed) An Introduction to the Globalization Debate. Polity Press, Oxford, UK, pp 1ā€“45

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Helleiner E (1997) Braudellian Reflections on Economic Globalization: the historian as pioneer. In: Gill S, Mittleman J (eds) Innovation and transformation in International Studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • INEGI (2006) National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics http://www.inegi.gob.mx Accessed 21 September 2006

  • INEGI (2005) National Institute of Statistics, Geography, and Informatics http://www.inegi.gob.mx Accessed 21 May 2005

  • La Red (2004) Social Studies Network for Disaster Prevention in Latin-America. Panama. www.desinventar.org Accessed 15 April 2004

  • Lederman D et al (2003) Lessons learned from NAFTA. NAFTAā€™s remaining trade barriers. The World Bank Group, Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Levy S, Van Wijnbergen S (1994) Labor Markets, Migration, and Welfare: agriculture in the North American Free Trade Agreement. Journal of Development Economics 43:73ā€“276

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Micco A, Perez N (2001) Maritime transport costs and port efficiency. Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • MonsivĆ”is C (1987) Los dĆ­as del temblor. In: Entrada libre: CrĆ³nicas de la sociedad que se organiza, Ed. Era, Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Munich Re (2005) Net Cat Service http://www.munichre.com/ Accessed 7 November 2005

  • Norris, FH, Stevens, SP, Pfefferbaum et al (2008) Community resilience as a Metaphor, Theory, Set of Capacities and Strategy for Disasters Readyness. American Journal of Community Psychology (41) 127-150

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Oā€™Brien K et al (2005) Hurricane Ktrina Reveals Challenges to Human Security. Aviso. Issue No. 14. October 2005. GECHS International Project Office. Oslo, Norway

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Prebisch R (1950) The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. United Nations, New York

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Quiroz S (2002) Competitividad e InversiĆ³n Extranjera Directa en MĆ©xico. In: AnĆ”lisis EconĆ³mico. No. 37, Vol. XVIII. Universidad AutĆ³noma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • RamĆ­rez CJ (2005) Cuando los ciudadanos tomaron la ciudad en sus manos. In: La Jornada, News. September 11, 2005. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Robinson S, Burfisher M, Thierfelder K (1995) The impact of the Mexican crisis on trade, agriculture, and migration. Trade and Macroeconomic Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • SaldaƱa-Zorrilla SO (2003) El Comercio MĆ©xico-UniĆ³n Europea. In: AnĆ”lisis EconĆ³mico No. 37., Vol. XVIII. 1er. Semestre 2003. Universidad AutĆ³noma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco. Mexico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • SIACON (2005) Sistema de InformaciĆ³n Agropecuaria de Consulta. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock http://www.siap.sagarpa.gob.mx/sistemas/siacon/SIACON.html Accessed 5 May 2005

  • Singer H (1950) The distribution of gains between borrowing and investing countries. American Economic Review 40:473ā€“485

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Singh MP, SuĆ”rez LE (1987) Seismic response analysis of structure-equipment systems with neoclassical damping effects. Earthquake Eng Structure Dyn 15:871ā€“888

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Todaro MP (2000) Urbanization and Rural-Urban Migration: Theory and Practice. In: Economic Development. Seventh Edition. Addison Wesley Longman. Essex

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • US Census Bureau (2002) http://www.census.gov/acs/www/ Accessed 2 August 2002

  • Vatsa KS, Krimgold F (2000) Financing Disaster Mitigation for the Poor. In: Managing Disaster Risk in Emerging Economies. The World Bank

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • World Bank (2002) Country assistance strategy of the World Bank Group for the Mexican United States, 2002. Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • World Bank (1994) Staff Appraisal Report of Rainfed Areas Development Project June 1994. Agriculture Operation Division. Country Department II. Latin-America and the Caribbean Regional Office

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • World Bank, Guy Carpenter, IIASA (2000) Managing the financial impacts of natural disaster losses in Mexico. Report prepared for the Government of Mexico

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • YĆŗnez-Naude A (2001) Mexican Agricultural Change and Mexico-US Inmigration. Issues paper presented at the Conference of the Project Changing Face of Rural California, University of California, Davis, Holtville, CA. Zambia and Zimbabwe, ed. Valdes, A. and Muir-Leresche, K., Washington, DC

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • YĆŗnez-Naude A, Barceinas F (2003) Los Impactos del TLCAN (NAFTA) en el sector agrĆ­cola de MĆ©xico. Mimeographed. Department of Economics. El Colegio de MĆ©xico, MĆ©xico City

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2015 The Author

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

SaldaƱa-Zorrilla, S.O. (2015). Natural hazards and economic stressors. In: Natural Disasters, Foreign Trade and Agriculture in Mexico. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17359-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics