Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

DSM-5: A Bioethical Overview

  • Chapter
Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update

  • 1420 Accesses

Abstract

The presentation of the new version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), in May 2013 during the annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association held in San Francisco, California, was preceded by a strong controversy, where not only the scientific community intervened, but so did the printed and digital media outlets. Through these media, the general public also witnessed an unprecedented situation in the development of psychiatry: not only was the public being informed, but they also had the opportunity to express their points of view through social media, web pages of specialized publications, and digital journals or newspapers. The controversy was initially focused on how the process of constructing the manual was conducted. However, this was not the only point that was being questioned: in addition to the positive aspects of the fifth version of the DSM (DSM-5), various opinions, more or less illustrated, were being made public about the limitations of the instrument. The approaches being presented herein lead us to watch more carefully how the DSM-5 should be applied, because an increasing number of authors recommended caution and care in the use of the manual. From a bioethical perspective, these positive and negative points are presented and discussed to then offer some conclusions and recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Del Barrio V. Roots and evolution of the DSM. Hist Psychol. 2009;30(2–3):81–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hymann SE. Grouping diagnoses of mental disorders by their common risk factor. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168(1):1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kupfer DJ, Kuhl EA, Regier DA. DSM 5 the future arrived. JAMA. 2013;309(16):1691–2. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.2298.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kupfer DJ, First MB, Regier DA, editors. A research agenda for DSM-V. Washington, DC: APA; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tomes N. Perspectives on women and mental illness. In: Apple R, editor. Women, health, and medicine in America: a historical handbook. New York: Garland; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tomes N. Feminist histories of psychiatry. In: Micale M, Porter R, editors. Discovering the history of psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernardi R. DSM-5, OPD-2 y PDM: similarities and differences between the new psychiatric and psychoanalytic diagnostic systems. RevPsiquiatrUrug. 2010;74(2):179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  8. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-5 Table of Contents [Internet]. 31 May 2013 Available from http://www.psychiatry.org/DSM 5. Cited 9 Dec 2013

  9. Dimsdale JE, Xin Y, Kleinman A, et al. Somatic manifestations of mental disorders. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Reed G. ICD (CIE)-11 or DSM-V. Which should be used? Infocop [Internet]. 11 Apr 2012. Available from http://www.infocop.es/view_article.asp?id=3922. Cited 10 Dec 2013.

  11. Block JJ. Issues for DSM-V: internet addiction. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(3):306–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eddy KT, Dorer DJ, Franko DL, Tahilani K, Thompson-Brenner H, Herzog DB. Diagnostic crossover in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: implications for DSM-V. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):245–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruipérez MA, Heimann C, Belloch A. The Spanish version of the DSN IV: translation or adaptation? J Psychopathol Clin Psychol. 1996;I(2):115–22.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrews G, Slade T, Sunderland M, Anderson T. Issues for DSM-V to enhance utility: the case of major depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2007;164(12):1784–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kupfer D, Regie D. To the DSM-5 User Community. APA DSM 5 Development [Internet]. 2013. Available from http://www.DSM5.org/Pages/Default.aspx. Cited 11 Dec 2013.

  16. Caplan A. Viewpoint: stop critiquing the DSM 5. Time [Internet]. 21 May 2013. Available from http://ideas.time.com/2013/05/21/viewpoint-stop-critiquing-the-dsm-5/. Cited 11 Dec 2013.

  17. Kupfer DJ, Regier DA. DSM-5 development. Research background DSM-5 field trials. American Psychiatric Association [Internet]. 2010. Available from http://www.DSM5.org/Research/Pages/DSM-5FieldTrials.aspx. Cited 11 Dec 2013.

  18. Frances A. DSM 5 is guide not Bible—ignore its ten worst changes. Psychiatric Times [Internet]. 5 Dec 2012. Available from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/login?referrer=http%3A//www.psychiatrictimes.com%2Fdsm-5-guide-not-bible%E2%80%94simply-ignore-its-10-worst-changes-0. Cited 14 Dec 2013.

  19. Frances A. Saving normal: an insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. New York: Harper Collins; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Carney J. The DSM-5 field trials: inter-rater reliability ratings take a nose dive [Internet]. 26 Mar 2013. Available from http://www.madinamerica.com/2013/03/the-dsm-5-field-trials-inter-rater-reliability-ratings-take-a-nose-dive/. Cited 14 Dec 2013.

  21. Kraemer H. Field trial results guide DSM recommendations [Internet]. 11 July 2012. Available from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-j-kupfer-md/dsm-5_b_2083092.html. Cited 12 Dec 2012.

  22. Freedman R, Lewis DA, Michels R, Pine DS, Schultz SK, Tamminga CA. The initial field trials of DSM-5: new blooms and old thorns. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170(1):1–5. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12091189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Frances A, Spitzer R. Letter to APA Trustees [Internet]. 20 Oct 2012. Available from http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/DSM5-in-distress/201012/spitzerfrances-letter-apa-trustees. Cited 12 Dec 2013.

  24. Greenberg G. The book of woe: the DSM and the unmaking of psychiatry. New York: Blue Rider; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Spitzer R. DSM-V: Open and transparent? Pychiatric News. 10 October 2014. Available from http://psychnews.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.1176/pn.43.14.0026. Cited 10 Dec 2014.

  26. Bonilla-Cortés C. DSM-5: College of Psychologists of Rosario warns “business behind new diseases”. Number of disorders listed [Internet]. 1 Ago 2014. Available from http://i0.wp.com/www.psicologosencostarica.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Graph_DSM5_Sick.jpg. Cited 25 May 2014.

  27. Rosenberg RS. Abnormal is the new normal: why will half of the U.S. population have a diagnosable mental disorder? Slate [Internet] 12 Apr 2013. Available from http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001456. Cited 28 May 2013.

  28. Lobo-Polidano E. On DSM, and its concept of disorder. Nodus. 2008;XXIX(3):34–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. American Psychiatric Publishing. Books [Internet]. 31 May 2013. Available from http://www.appi.org/SearchCenter/Pages/default.aspx?k=%20+MAINCATEGORY:%22DSM%22. Cited 2 June 2013.

  30. Reed GM, Mendonça Correia J, Esparza P, Saxena S, Maj M. The WPA-WHO global survey of psychiatrists’ uses and attitudes towards mental disorders classification. World Psychiatry. 2011;10:118–31.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frances A. The new crisis in confidence in psychiatric diagnosis. Ann Intern Med. 2013. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-159-3-201308060-00655. Published online 17 May 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lieberman J. Change, challenge and opportunity: psychiatry in age of reform and enlightenment. Psychiatr News. 2013;48(17):1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Montiel-Nava C, Peña J. Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in autism spectrum disorders. Clin Invest. 2011;52(2):195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  34. First MB, Frances A. Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes: the case of paraphilias. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(10):1240–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gaviria S, Alarcón R. Psicopatología y género: visión longitudinal e histórica a través del DSM. Rev Colomb Psiquiat. 2010;39(2):389–404.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Narrow WE, First MB, Sirovatka R, Regier DA, editors. Age and gender considerations in psychiatric diagnosis: a research agenda for DSM V. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Paris J. Prescriptions for the mind. A critical view of contemporary psychiatry. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Maass-Vivanco J. Impact of the DSM 5 at the 166th annual congress of the American Psychiatric Association [Internet]. Jun 2013. Available from http://www.sonepsyn.cl/index.php?id=4735. Cited 5 Dec 2013.

  39. Insel T. Transforming diagnosis [Internet]. 29 Apr 2013. Available from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2013/transforming-diagnosis.shtml. Cited 5 Dec 2013.

  40. Andorno R. Precautionary principle. In: Tealdi JC, coord. Latin American Dictionary of Bioethics. Bogotá, Unibiblos and the Latin American and Caribbean Bioethics Network of the UNESCO; 2008. p. 345–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bioethics, Medicine Faculty, Universidad de La Sabana, Campus Universitario del Puente del Común, Autopista Norte Km. 7, Chía, Cundinamarca, Colombia

    Gilberto A. Gamboa-Bernal M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D.(c)

Authors
  1. Gilberto A. Gamboa-Bernal M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D.(c)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilberto A. Gamboa-Bernal M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D.(c) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Guaymallen Mendoza, Argentina

    Pascual Ángel Gargiulo

  2. Member of the Council of the Institute of Neurobiology (Buenos Aires); Member of the Board of Certification, National Academy of Medicine (Argentina), Psychiatrist by University Complutense of Madrid and University of Buenos Aires; Former Director of National Institute of Mental Health (Argentina), Cuyo, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Humberto Luis Mesones Arroyo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gamboa-Bernal, G.A. (2015). DSM-5: A Bioethical Overview. In: Gargiulo, P., Arroyo, H. (eds) Psychiatry and Neuroscience Update. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17103-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17103-6_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17102-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17103-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation