Abstract
The results from the international benchmarking tests on mathematics and science achievements such as the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) revealed that students from East Asian countries consistently outperformed their counterparts in each and every cycle of the study. Among the high-achieving countries, the performances of the students in Singapore, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and Hong Kong are recognized by the international education community. Some educators believe that the success of these countries is deeply rooted in eastern philosophy and cultural notion of education and influence of parental encouragements. Some think that the reasons are multifaceted including instructional practices, classroom climates, and the curriculum. Scientific explanations will provide insights into how these educational systems are functioning in improving the standard and achievement in science subjects in schools. This book attempts to bring together prominent science educators and researchers from the East Asia to share their experience and findings, reflection and vision on emerging trends, research-informed pedagogical innovations, and best practices in science education in the region.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chan, T. W., & Koo, A. (2011). Parenting style and youth outcomes in the UK. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 385–399.
Dorier, J. L., & García, F. J. (2013). Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching. ZDM, 45(6), 837–849.
Fensham, P. J. (2013). International assessments of science learning: Their positive and negative contributions to science education. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy (pp. 11–31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Forbes, C. T. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry‐based elementary science. Science Education, 95(5), 927–955.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300–329.
Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 1–23.
Lee, K., & Sriraman, B. (2013). An Eastern learning paradox: Paradoxes in two Korean mathematics teachers’ pedagogy of silence in the classroom. Interchange, 43(2), 147–166.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496.
Örtenblad, A., Babur, M., & Kumari, R. (2012). Learning in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(2), 131–136.
Patten, K. E., & Campbell, S. R. (2011). Introduction: Educational neuroscience. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(1), 1–6.
Rao, N., & Chan, C. K. (2010). Moving beyond paradoxes: Understanding Chinese learners and their teachers. In N. Rao & C. Chan (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner (pp. 3–32). Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khine, M.S. (2015). Research and Development in Science Education: East Asian Perspectives. In: Khine, M. (eds) Science Education in East Asia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16390-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16389-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16390-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)